Coping with employment issues through commuting: Evidence from Central Russia

Open access

Abstract

Commuting to work has become a widespread practice over the last several decades. Some relatively strong employment issues in rural Russian municipalities, as well as a significant wage gap between them and the major cities, fosters daily commuting as well as commuting with long periods of time spent at employment locations, known in Russia as otkhodnichestvo. Based on official statistical data and our own surveys conducted in Tula and Kostroma regions, we analysed the spatial differentiations between the share of commuters in the employed population of rural municipalities, as well as the variations in individual socio-economic characteristics between rural commuters and non-commuters, in general, and between the commuters themselves. Our analysis of the latter characteristics suggests that there is in fact more difference between the rural commuters and non-commuters in Russia than between daily commuters and those engaged in otkhodnichestvo, indicating similar motives and, perhaps, even personalities of commuters. Giving the identified differences, commuting on a larger scale does not seem to be a universal tool to cope with employment issues, as some population groups are more likely to engage in it than others.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • ASEEVA A. (2013): Rinok truda i zanyatost naseleniya v selskoy mestnosti Kurskoy oblasti Vestnik Kurskoy Gosudarstvennoy Selskokhozyastvennoy Akademii 2: 21–24.

  • BÄCKSTRÖM P. SANDOW E. WESTERLUND O. (2016): Commuting and timing of retirement. The Annals of Regional Science 56: 125–152.

  • BARCUS H. BRUNN S. (2010): Place elasticity: exploring a new conceptualization of mobility and place attachment in rural America. Geografiska Annaler Series B: Human Geography 92(4): 281–295.

  • BDPMO (2015): Database of municipal statistics [online]. Russian Federal Statistical Agency website [cit. 30.07.2016]. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/bd_munst/munst.htm

  • BENEDEK J. MOLDAVAN A. (2015): Economic convergence and polarization: towards a multi-dimensional approach. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 64(3): 187–203.

  • BONDARENKO L. GRUDNEVA A. (2010): Sostoyanie selskogo rinka truda. Uroven Zhizni Naseleniya Regionov 3: 24–32.

  • BYKOV V. [eds.] (2011): Formirovaniye konkurentnosposobnogo personala v usloviyakh vakhtovogo metoda raboty: na primere neftegazovoy otrasli. Yaroslavl Avers Plyus.

  • CARRINGTON K. HOGG R. MCINTOSH A. SCOTT J. (2012): Crime talk FIFO workers and cultural conflict on the mining boom frontier. Australian Humanities Review 53: 1–14.

  • CASSEL S. H. MACUCHOVA Z. RUDHOLM N. RYDELL A. (2013): Willingness to commute long distance among job seekers in Dalarna Sweden. Journal of Transport Geography 28: 49–55.

  • CHEN Y. ROSENTHAL S. S. (2008): Local amenities and life-cycle migration: Do people move for jobs or fun? Journal of Urban Economics 64: 519–537.

  • CHEPURENKO A. (2010): Small entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial activity of population in Russia in the context of economic transition. Historical Social Research 35(2): 301–319.

  • COPUS A. K. (2001): From core-periphery to polycentric development: concepts of spatial and aspatial peripherality. European Planning Studies 9(4): 539–552.

  • FISCHER-TAHIR A. NAUMANN M. (2013): Introduction: Peripheralization as the social production of spatial dependencies and injustice. In: Fischer-Tahir A. Naumann M. [eds.]: Peripeharalization. The making of spatial dependences and social injustice (pp. 9–26). Wiesbaden Springer.

  • FLORINSKAYA U. (2006): Trudovaya migratsiya iz malikh gorodov kak sposob vizhivaniya. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya 6: 79–89.

  • GILMARTIN M. (2008): Migration identity and belonging. Geography Compass 2(6): 1837–1852.

  • GREEN A. (1997): A question of compromise? Case study evidence on the location and mobility of strategies of dual career households. Regional Studies 31(7): 641–657.

  • GRITSAY O. IOFFE G. TREIVISH A. [eds.] (1991): Tsentr i periferiya v regionalnom razvitii. Mosow Nauka.

  • GULYAEVA T. GRIGORIEVA N. (2012): Rynok truda: problemi zanyatosti selskogo naseleniya v Orlovskoy oblasti. Vestnik Orlovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Agrarnogo Universiteta 34(1): 158–162.

  • GUNKO M. (2015): Vzaimosvyazi malikh gorodov i selskikh rainov v Tsentralnoy Rossii. Thesis [online]. Institute of geography RAS website [cit. 25.06.2016]. Available at: http://www.igras.ru/sites/default/files/announcements/Gunko_diss.pdf

  • HANSON S. PRATT G. [eds.] (1995): Gender Work and Space. International Studies of Women and Place. London Routledge.

  • HJORTHOL R. J. (2000): Same city — different options: an analysis of the work trips of married couples in the metropolitan area of Oslo. Journal of Transport Geography 8: 213–220.

  • HOFMEISTER H. SCHNEIDER N. (2010): Job mobilities in Europe: Core findings policy implications future outlook. In: Schneider N. Collet B. [eds.]: Mobile Living Across Europe II. Causes and Consequences of Job-Related Spatial Mobility in Cross-National Perspective (pp. 337–356). Opladen Barbara Budrich Publishers.

  • HOGARTH T. (1987): Long distance weekly commuting. Policy Studies 8(1): 27–43.

  • HORVATH I. (2008): The culture of migration of rural Romanian youth. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34(5): 771–786.

  • IOFFE G. [eds.] (1990): Selskoe khozyaistvo Nechernozemya: territorialnie problemi. Moscow Nauka.

  • IOFFE G. NEFEDOVA T. ZASLAVSKY I. (2004): From spatial continuity to fragmentation: the case of Russian farming. Annals of Association of American Geographers 94(4): 913–943.

  • KASHNITSKY I. S. MKRTCHYAN N. V. (2014): Russian periphery is dying in movement: a cohort assessment of Russian internal youth migration based on census data. NIDI Working Papers 2014/14 [online]. Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute website [cit. 9.08.2016]. Available at: www.nidi.nl/shared/content/output/papers/nidi-wp-2014-14.pdf

  • KÜHN M. (2015): Peripheralization: Theoretical Concepts Explaining Socio-Spatial Inequalities. European Planning Studies 23(2): 367–378.

  • KÜHN M. WECK S. (2012): Peripherisierung – Prozesse Probleme und Strategien in Mittelstädten. disP – The Planning Review 48(2): 14–26.

  • LANG T. (2012): Shrinkage metropolization and peripheralization in East Germany. European Planning Studies 20(10): 1747–1754.

  • LANGDON R. BIGGS H. ROWLAND B. (2016): Australian fly-in fly-out operations: Impacts on communities safety workers and their families. Work 55(2): 413–427.

  • LEIBERT T. (2013): The peripheralization of rural areas in post-socialist Central Europe: A case of fragmenting development? Lessons from rural Hungary. In: Fischer-Tahir A. Naumann M. [eds.]: Peripeharalization. The making of spatial dependences and social injustice (pp. 101–120). Wiesbaden Springer.

  • LÜCK D. RUPPENTHAL S. (2010): Insights into mobile living: spread appearances and characteristics. In: Schneider N. Collet B. [eds.]: Mobile Living Across Europe II. Causes and Consequences of Job-Related Spatial Mobility in Cross-National Perspective (pp. 37–68). Opladen Barbara Budrich Publishers.

  • MAKHROVA A. G. NEFEDOVA T. G. TREIVISH A. I. (2013): Moscow agglomeration and “New Moscow”: The capital city-region case of Russia’s urbanization. Regional Research of Russia 3(2): 131–141.

  • MASSEY D. ARANGO J. HUGO G. KOUAOUCI A. PELLEGRINO A. TAYLOR J. E. (1993). Theories of international migration: a review and appraisal. Population and Development Review 19(3): 431–466.

  • MCQUAID R. GREIG M. ADAMS J. (2001): Unemployed job seekers attitudes towards potential travel-to-work times. Growth and Change 32(1): 66–73.

  • MKRTCHYAN N. V. (2010): Migratsionnaya i mobilnost v Rossii: otsenki i problemi analiza. Demoscop Weekly 445–446 [online]. Demoscop weekly website [cit. 20.07.2016]. Available at: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2010/0445/analit01.php

  • NEFEDOVA T. (2008): Rossiiskay periferiya kak socialno-economichesky fenomen [Russian periphery as a socioeconomic phenomenon]. Regionalnie Issledovaniya 20: 14–30.

  • NEFEDOVA T. (2012): Major trends for changes in the socioeconomic space of rural Russia. Regional Research of Russia 2(1): 41–54.

  • NEFEDOVA T. (2013a): Desyat aktualnikh voprosov o selskoy Rossii. Otveti geografa. Mosow URSS.

  • NEFEDOVA T. (2013b): Polyarizatsiya gorodov i selskoy mestnosti i rasshirenie rossiiskoy periferii. In: Artobolevsky S. Glezer O. [eds.]: Regionalnoe razvitie i regionalnaya politika Rossii v perekhodniy period (pp. 280–298). Moscow MGTU im. Baumana.

  • NEFEDOVA T. (2015a): Migration mobility of population and otkhodnichestvo in modern Russia. Regional Research of Russia 5(3): 243–256.

  • NEFEDOVA T. (2015b): Otkhodnichestvo v sisteme migratsii v post-sovetskoy Rossii. Geographiya Demoscop Weekly 643–644 [online]. Demoscop weekly website [cit. 20.07.2016]. Available at: http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2015/0643/tema01.php

  • NEFEDOVA T. AVERKIEVA K. MAKHROVA A. [eds.] (2016): Mezhdu domom i ... domom. Vozvratnaya prostranstvennaya mobilnost naseleniya Rossii. Moscow Noviy Khronograf.

  • NEFEDOVA T. TREIVISH A. (2014): Russia between the two capitals: Specifics of territorial changes. Regional Research of Russia 4(4): 207–219.

  • ONPPZ (2013): The Population Survey on Employment Issues [online]. Russian Federal Statistical Agency website [cit. 8.08.2016]. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/b13_30/Main.htm

  • PERRY M. ROWE J. (2015): Fly-in fly-out drive-in drive-out: The Australian mining boom and its impacts on the local economy. Local Economy 30(1): 139–148.

  • PLÖGER J. WECK S. (2014): Confronting out-migration and the skills gap in declining German cities. European Planning Studies 22(2): 437–455.

  • PLUSNIN J. POZANENKO A. ZHIDKEVICH N. (2015): Otkhodnichestvo kak novy faktor obschestvennoy zhizni. Mir Rossii 24(1): 35–71.

  • PLUSNIN J. ZAUSAEVA Y. ZHIDKEVICH N. POZANENKO A. [eds.] (2013): Otkhodniki. Moscow Noviy Khronograf.

  • POKROVSKY N. NEFEDOVA T. [eds.] (2014): Potentsial blizhnego severa. Ekonomika ekologiya selskie poseleniya. Moscow Logos.

  • ROUND J. WILLIAMS C. (2010): Coping with the social costs of “transition”: Everyday life in post-Soviet Russia and Ukraine. European Urban and Regional Studies 17(2): 183–196.

  • SANDOW E. (2008): Commuting behaviour in sparsely populated areas: evidence from northern Sweden. Journal of Transport Geography 16: 14–27.

  • SANDOW E. (2011): On the road: Social aspects of commuting long distances to work. PhD thesis [online]. Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet website [cit. 8.08.2016]. Available at: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:415050/FULLTEXT01.pdfGERUM

  • SANDOW E. WESTIN K. (2010): The persevering commuter – Duration of long-distance commuting. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 44: 433–445.

  • SAVOSKUL M. (2013): Sidelki iz provintsii v bolshom gorode. Sotsialnaya Diagnostika 113(1): 127–135.

  • SAXINGER G. (2015): Lured by oil and gas: Labour mobility multi-locality and negotiating normality and extreme in the Russian Far North. The Extractive Industries and Society 3: 50–59.

  • SAXINGER G. ÖFNER E. SHAKIROVA E. IVANOVA M. YAKOVLEV M. GAREYEV E. (2016): Ready to go! The next generation of mobile highly skilled workforce in the Russian petroleum industry. The Extractive Industries and Society 3: 627–639.

  • SHABANOVA M. (1992): Otkhodnichestvo i rynok rabochey sily. Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya 2: 29–39.

  • SMITH A. TIMAR J. (2010): Uneven transformations: Space economy and society 20 years after the collapse of state socialism. European Urban and Regional Studies 17(2): 115–125.

  • SMITH D. M. (1996): The socialist city. In: Andrusz G. Harloe M. Szelenyi I. [eds.]: Cities after socialism. Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies (pp. 70–99). Oxford Blackwell.

  • SO K. S. ORAZEM P. F. OTTO D. M. (2001): The effects of housing prices wages and commuting time on joint residential and job location choices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(4): 1036–1048.

  • THULIN E. VILHELMSON B. (2014): Virtual practices and migration plans: A qualitative study of urban young adults. Population Space and Place 20: 389–401.

  • VPN (2010): Russian Population Census [online]. Russian Federal Statistical Agency website [cit. 8.08.2016]. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/perepis2010/croc/perepis_itogi1612.htm

  • WASTL-WALTER D. VARADI M. M. VEIDER F. (2003): Coping with marginality: to stay or to go. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 29(5): 797–817.

  • WEGREN S. K. (2014): Rural inequality in post-Soviet Russia. Problems of Post-Communism 61(1): 52–64.

  • WIEST K. (2015): Migration and everyday discourses: Peripheralisation in rural Saxony-Anhalt from a gender perspective. Journal of Rural Studies 43: 280–290.

  • ZAYONCHKOVSKAYA Z. A. MKRTCHYAN N. V. (2009): Rol’ migratsii v dinamike chislennisti i sostava naselenija Moskvi. In: Zayonchkovskaya Z. [eds.]: Immigranti v Moskve (pp. 18–44). Moscow Tri kvadrata.

  • ZHIDKEVICH N. (2013): Sotsialny portret sovremennogo otkhodnika nizhegorodskogo Zavolzhiya. In: Shipilev A. [eds.]: Region v period modernizatsii: sotsialnie instituti (pp. 118–121). Nizhny Novgorod NISOC.

  • ZUBAREVICH N. [eds.] (2013): Sotsialnoe razvitie regionov Rossii. Problemi i tendentsii perekhodnogo perioda. Moscow URSS.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.870
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.858

CiteScore 2018: 2.07

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.445
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.877

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 275 171 2
PDF Downloads 136 86 0