A functional interaction approach to the definition of meso regions: The case of the Czech Republic

Open access

Abstract

The definition of functional meso regions for the territory of the Czech Republic is articulated in this article. Functional regions reflect horizontal interactions in space and are presented as a useful tool for various types of geographical analyses, and also for spatial planning, economic policy designs, etc. This paper attempts to add to the discussion on the need to delineate areal units at different hierarchical levels, and to understand the functional flows and spatial behaviours of the population in a given space. Three agglomerative methods are applied in the paper (the CURDS regionalisation algorithm, Intramax, and cluster analysis), and they have not been used previously in Czech geography for the delineation of functional meso regions. Existing functional regions at the micro-level, based on daily travel-to-work flows from the 2001 census, have served as the building blocks. The analyses have produced five regional systems at the meso level, based on daily labour commuting movements of the population. Basic statistics and a characterisation of these systems are provided in this paper.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • BALL R. M. (1980): The use and definition of travel-to-work areas in Great Britain: some problems. Regional Studies 14(2): 125-139.

  • BERRY B. J. L. (1973): Growth centers in the American urban system: Community development and regional growth in the sixties and seventies. Cambridge: Ballinger Pub. Co.

  • BEZÁK A. (2000): Funkčné mestské regióny na Slovensku. Geographia Slovaca 15 Bratislava: Geografický ústav SAV.

  • BROWN L. A. HOLMES J. (1971): The delimitation of functional regions nodal regions and hierarchies by functional distance approaches. Journal of Regional Science 11(1): 57-72.

  • CASADO-DÍAZ J. M. (2000): Local labour market areas in Spain: a case study. Regional Studies 34(9): 843-856.

  • CASADO-DÍAZ J. M. (2003): The use of commuting data to define local labour market areas and urban areas in Spain. Paper presented at 7th NECTAR Conference Umeå University Sweden.

  • CHRISTALLER W. (1933): Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland. Jena: Fischer.

  • COOMBES M. G. (2010): Defining labour market areas by analysing commuting data: innovative methods in the 2007 review of Travel-to-Work Areas. In: Stillwell J. Duke-Williams O. Dennett A. [eds.]: Technologies for migration and commuting analysis: spatial interaction data applications (pp. 227-241). Hershey: IGI Global.

  • COOMBES M. G. BOND S. (2008): Travel-to-Work Areas: the 2007 review. Office for National Statistics London.

  • COOMBES M. G. DIXON J. S. GODDARD J. B. OPENSHAW S. TAYLOR P. J. (1982): Functional regions for the population census of Great Britain. In: Herbert D. T. Johnston R. J. [eds.]: Geography and the Urban Environment. Progress in Research and Applications 5 Chichester: John Wiley p. 63-112.

  • COOMBES M. G. GREEN A. E. OPENSHAW S. (1986): An Efficient Algorithm to Generate Official Statistical Reporting Areas: The Case of the 1984 Travel-to-Work Areas Revision in Britain. The Journal of the Operational Research Society 37(10): 943-953.

  • De JONG T. Van der VAART N. (2010): Manual Flowmap Faculty of Geographical Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht [online]. [cit. 13.10.2015] Available at: http:// flowmap.geo.uu.nl/downloads/FM740_Manual.pdf

  • DROBNE S. BOGATAJ M. (2012): Evaluating Functional Regions. Croatian Operational Research Review 3: 14-26.

  • DROBNE S. KONJAR M. LISEC A. (2009): Delimitation of Functional Regions Using Labour Market Approach. In: Zadnik Stirn L. Žerovnik J. Drobne S. Lisec A. (ed.): Proceedings of SOR’09 10th International Symposium on Operational Research in Slovenia Slovenian Society Informatika Section for Operational Research (pp.417- 425). Ljubljana Slovenia.

  • ERLEBACH M. KLAPKA P. HALÁS M. TONEV P. (2014): Inner structure of functional region: theoretical aspects. In: 17th International Colloquim on Regional Science. Conference Proceedings. (Hustopeče 18.-20.6. 2014) (pp. 722-727). Masarykova univerzita Brno.

  • FARMER C. J. Q. FOTHERINGHAM A. S. (2011): Network-based functional regions. Environment and Planning A 43(11): 2723-2741.

  • FENG Z. (2009): Fuzziness of Travel-to-Work Areas. Regional Studies 43(5): 707-720.

  • GUSTAFSON G. C. (1973): Numerical Classification Procedures. LARS Symposia. Paper 16.

  • HAGGETT P. (1965): Locational Analysis in Human Geography. London: Arnold.

  • HALÁS M. KLAPKA P. (2010): Regional division of Czechia on the basis of spatial interaction modelling. Geografie 115(2): 144-160.

  • HALÁS M. ZUSKÁČOVÁ V. (2013). Travelling to services in the daily urban system of Olomouc. Bulletin of Geography Socio-economic Series 20: 23-41.

  • HALÁS M. KLAPKA P. TONEV P. (2014a): A contribution to human geographical regionalisation of the Czech Republic at the mezzo level. In: 17th International Colloquim on Regional Science. Conference Proceedings. (Hustopeče 18.-20.6. 2014) (pp. 715-721). Masarykova univerzita Brno.

  • HALÁS M. KLAPKA P. BLEHA B. BEDNÁŘ M. (2014b): Funkčné regióny na Slovensku podľa denných tokov do zamestnania. Geografický časopis 66(2): 89-114.

  • HALÁS M. KLAPKA P. BEDNÁŘ M. TONEV P. (2015): An alternative definition and use for the constraint function for rule-based methods of functional regionalisation. Environment and Planning A 47(5): 1175-1191.

  • HALL P. G. HAY D. (1980): Growth centres in the European urban system. London: Heinemann.

  • HOLMES J. H. HAGGETT P. (1977): Graph theory interpretation of flow matrices: a note on maximization procedures for identifying significant links. Geographical Analysis 9(4): 388-399.

  • ISARD W. (1956): Location and space economy: A general theory relating industrial location market areas land use trade and urban structure. New York: John Wiley.

  • KARLSSON C. OLSSON M. (2006): The identification of functional regions: theory methods and applications. The Annals of Regional Science 40(1): 1-18.

  • KLAPKA P. HALÁS M. TONEV P. (2013a): Functional regions: concept and types. In: 16th International Colloquium on Regional Sciences Conference Proceedings (pp. 94-101). Brno: Masaryk University.

  • KLAPKA P. HALÁS M. TONEV P. BEDNÁŘ M. (2013b): Functional regions of the Czech Republic: comparison of simple and advanced methods of regional taxonomy. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis Facultas Rerum Naturalium Geographica 44(1): 45-57.

  • KLAPKA P. HALÁS M. ERLEBACH M. TONEV P. BEDNÁŘ M. (2014): A multistage agglomerative approach for defining functional regions of the Czech Republic: The use of 2001 commuting data. Moravian Geographical Reports 22(4): 2-13.

  • KONJAR M. BOYANDIN I. LALANNE D. LISEC A. DROBNE S. (2010): Using flow maps to explore functional regions in Slovenia. The Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Society and Information Technologies. Dolenjske Teplice.

  • KROPP P. SCHWENGLER B. (2014): Three-Step Method for Delineating Functional Labour Market Regions. Regional Studies 50(3): 429-445.

  • LANDRÉ M. (2012): Geoprocessing Journey-to-Work Data: Delineating Commuting Regions in Dalarna Sweden. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf 1: 294-314.

  • LANDRÉ M. HÅKANSSON J. (2013): Rule versus interaction function: evaluating regional aggregations of commuting flows in Sweden. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 13(1): 1-19.

  • LÖSCH A. (1940): The Economics of Localization. Jena Fischer.

  • MASSER I. BROWN P. J. B. (1975): Hierarchical aggregation procedures for interaction data. Environment and Planning A 7(5): 509-523.

  • MASSER I. SCHEURWATER J. (1980): Functional regionalisation of spatial interaction data: an evaluation of some suggested strategies. Environment and Planning A 12(12): 1357-1382.

  • MITCHELL W. F. WATTS M. J. (2010). Identifying functional regions in Australia using hierarchical aggregate techniques. Geographical Research 48(1): 24-41.

  • NYSTUEN J. D. DACEY M. F. (1961): A graph theory interpretation of nodal regions. Regional Science Association Papers and Proceedings 7(1): 29-42.

  • OECD (2002): Redefining Territories: The Functional Regions. Paris: OECD.

  • PAPPS K. L. NEWELL J. O. (2002): Identifying functional labour market areas in New Zealand: a reconnaissance study using travel-to-work data. Discussion Paper 443. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.

  • PHILBRICK A. K. (1957): Principles of areal functional organization in regional human geography. Economic Geography 33(4): 299-336.

  • ROUSSEEUW P. J. (1987): Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 20: 53-65.

  • SMART M. W. (1974): Labour market areas: uses and definition. Progress in Planning 2(4): 239-353.

  • SÝKORA L. MULÍČEK O. (2009): The micro-regional nature of functional urban areas (FUAs): lessons from the analysis of Czech urban and regional system. Urban Research and Practice 2(3): 287-307.

  • THÜNEN von J. H. (1826) Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landschaft und Nationalökonomie. Trans. By C. M. Wartenberg (1966): Von Thünen’s Isolated State. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

  • TONEV P. (2013): Změny v dojížďce za prací v období transformace: komparace lokálních trhů práce. Diploma thesis. Brno: Masaryk University.

  • WARD J. H. (1963): Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58: 236-244.

  • WATTS M. (2009): Rules versus hierarchy: an application of fuzzy set theory to the assessment of spatial grouping techniques. In: Kolehmainen M. Toivanen P. J. Beliczynski B. [eds.]: ICANNGA 2009 LNCS 5495: 517-526.

  • WONG D. (2009): The modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP). In: Fotheringham A. Rogerson P. [eds.]: The SAGE handbook of spatial analysis (pp. 105-125). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1,870
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1,858



CiteScore 2018: 2.07

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.445
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.877

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 237 112 1
PDF Downloads 106 72 1