Religion and gender inequality: The status of women in the societies of world religions

Open access


The status of women in society is very diverse worldwide. Among many important traits associated with the differentiation of gender inequality is religion, which itself must be regarded as a fluid concept with interpretations and practices ‘embedded’ and thus varying with respect to cultural and historical relations. Admitting the complexity of the issues, some religious norms and traditions can contribute to the formation of gender inequalities and to subordinate the role of women in society. Using an exploratory quantitative analysis, the influence of religiosity on gender inequality in social, economic and political spheres is examined. Three categories of states have emerged from the analysis: (a) states where the majority of inhabitants are without religious affiliation, which display the lowest levels of gender inequality; (b) Christian and Buddhist societies, with average levels of gender inequality; and (c) states with the highest levels of gender inequality across the observed variables, whose inhabitants adhere to Islam and Hinduism.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • (2013): National and World Religion Statistics – Church Statistics – World Religions [online]. [cit. 17.01.2013]. Available at: URL:

  • AITCHISON C. [eds.]. (2007): Geographies of Muslim identities: diaspora gender and belonging. Ashgate Aldershot.

  • BILEZIKIAN G. (2006): Beyond Sex Roles: What the Bible says about a Woman's Place in Church and Family. Baker Academic.

  • CABEZÓN I. (1992): Buddhism Sexuality and Gender. Albany State University of New York Press.

  • Census of India (1991): Chhattisgarh Government. Official Website of Government Of Chhattisgarh [online]. [cit. 02.02.2013]. Available at: URL:

  • Census of India (2001) [online]. [cit. 02.02.2013]. Available at: URL:

  • Census of India (2011) [online]. [cit. 03.02.2013]. Available at: URL:

  • CHAUDHURI S. (2013): A Life Course Model of Human Rights Realization Female Empowerment and Gender Inequality in India. World Development 52: 55–70.

  • DEL CASINO JR V. J. (2009): Social Geography. Critical Introductions to Geography. Chichester Wiley-Blackwell.

  • DOLLAR D. GATTI R. (1999): Gender inequality income and growth: Are good times good for women? Policy research report on gender and development working paper series No. 1.

  • DRURY C. (1994): Christianity. In: Holm J. J. Bowker J. [eds.]: Women in religion (pp. 30–54). New York Continuum.

  • Economic Review of Tripura (2010–11): Directorate of Economics and Statistics Planning (Statistics) Department Government of Tripura Agartala [online]. [cit. 03.02.2013] Available at: URL:

  • ENGLAND K. (2006): Producing Feminist Geographies: Theory Methodologies and Research Strategies. In: Aitken S. Valentine G. [eds.]: Approaches to human geography (pp. 286–298). London Sage Publications.

  • FALAH G. W. NAGEL C. (2005): Geographies of Muslim women: gender religion and space. New York Guilford Press.

  • GROSS R. M. (1994): Buddhism. In: Holm J. J. Bowker J. [eds.]: Women in religion (pp. 1–29). New York Continuum.

  • GUISO L. SAPIENZAD P. ZINGALES L. (2003): People’s opium? Religion and Economic Attitudes. Journal of Monetary Economics 50: 225–282.

  • GUNEWARDENE A. HUON G. F. ZHENG R. (2001): Exposure to Westernization and Dieting: A Cross-Cultural Study. Int. J. Eat. Disord 29: 289–293.

  • HAMPLOVÁ D. (2013): Náboženství v české společnosti na prahu 3. tisíciletí. Praha Karolinum.

  • HAMPLOVÁ D. (2011): Náboženství a pohlaví: Proč jsou ženy zbožnější než muži? Sociologický časopis 47(2): 297–323.

  • HAVLÍČEK T. HUPKOVÁ M. (2013): Sacred structures in the landscape: the case of rural Czechia. Scottish Geographical Journal 129(2): 100–121.

  • HAVLÍČEK T. HUPKOVÁ M. (2008): Religious landscape in Czechia: new structures and trends. Geografie 113(3): 302–319.

  • HOLM J. (1994): Introduction: raising the issues. In: Holm J. J. Bowker J. [eds.]: Women in religion (pp. 12–22). New York Continuum.

  • HOPKINS P. (2009): Men women positionalities and emotion: doing feminist geographies of religion. ACME: an International Journal for Critical Geographers 8(1): 1–17.

  • INGLEHART R. NORRIS P. (2003): Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.

  • International Labour Office (2011): Labour force participation rate published in Key Indicators of the Labour Market [online]. [cit. 02.02.2013] Available at: URL:

  • Inter-Parliamentary Union (2012): Parline database on women in parliament [online]. [cit. 20.02.2013]. Available at: URL:

  • KING U. (1995): Gender and the Study of Religion. In: King U. [ed.]: Religion and Gender (pp. 1–40). Oxford Blackwell.

  • KLINGOROVÁ K. (2015): Genderové rozdíly ve vybraných světových náboženstvích. In: Doboš P. Honsnejmanová I. [eds.]: Geografický výzkum: Prostor ve své transdisciplinaritě. Brno Masarykova univerzita (in print).

  • KLINGOROVÁ K. (2013): Vliv náboženství na postavení žen ve vybraných státech (diploma thesis). UK v Praze PřF KSGRR Praha.

  • KNOTKOVÁ-ČAPKOVÁ B. (2008): Obrazy ženství v náboženských kulturách. Praha–Litomyšl Paseka.

  • KONG L. (2001): Mapping ‘new’ geographies of religion: politics and poetics in modernity. Progress in Human Geography 25: 211–33.

  • KONG L. (2010): Global shift theoretical shifts: Changing geographies of religion. Progress in Human Geography 34(6): 755–776.

  • KREJČÍ J. (2009): Ženy ve spektru civilizací. Klíčový problém ve vývojové perspektivě. In: Tomeš J. [ed.]: Ženy ve spektru civilizací. K proměnám postavení žen ve vývoji lidské společnosti (pp. 9–21). Praha Sociologické nakladatelství.

  • MASSEY D. (1994): Space place and gender. London Polity.

  • MOGHADAM V. M. (1991): The Reproduction of Gender Inequality in Muslim Societies: A Case Study of Iran in the 1980s. World Development 19(10): 1335–1349.

  • NASIR J. J. (2009): The Status of Women under Islamic Law and Modern Islamic Legislation. Leiden Brill.

  • NEŠPOR Z. R. (2008): Genderové pojetí božství a sacerdotálních vrstev. In: Nešpor Z. R Václavík D. [eds.]: Příručka sociologie náboženství. Praha Slon.

  • NORRIS P. INGLEHART R. (2004): Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.

  • PEACH C. (2006): Islam ethnicity and South Asian Religions in the London 2001 census. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 31(3): 353–370.

  • RENZETTI C. M. CURRAN D. J. (1999): Women men and society. Boston Allyn and Bacon.

  • RIDGEWAY C. (2004): Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations. Gender and Society 18(4): 510–531.

  • ROSE G. (1993): Feminism and geography: the limits of geographical knowledge. Cambridge Polity.

  • SEGUINO S. (2011): Help or Hindrance? Religion’s Impact on Gender Inequality in Attitudes and Outcomes. World Development 39(8): 1308–1321.

  • SHARP J. (2009): Geography and gender: what belongs to feminist geography? Emotion power and change. Progress in Human Geography 33(1): 74–80.

  • SINCLAIR K. (1986): Women and religion. In: Dudley M. I. Edwards M. I. [eds.]: The Cross-cultural Study of Women: A Comprehensive Guide (pp. 107–124). New York The Feminist Press.

  • STUMP R. (2008): The Geography of Religion: Faith Place and Space. Maryland Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

  • STURM T. (2013): The future of religious politics: towards a research and theory agenda. Area 45(2): 134–140.

  • SUGIRTHARAJAH S. (1994): Hinduism. In: Holm J. J. Bowker J. [eds.]: Women in religion (pp. 59–83). New York Continuum.

  • UNESCO (2013): Institute for Statistics. [online]. [cit. 20.02.2013] Available at: URL:

  • United Nations Development Program (2013): International Human Development Indicators. Database [online]. [cit. 02.02.2013]. Available at: URL:

  • United Nations Statistics Division (2011): United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division [online]. [cit. 14.02.2013] Available at: URL:

  • VERVEER M. (2011): The Political and Economic Power of Women. Center for International Private Enterprise [online]. [cit. 19.03.2013] Available at: URL:

  • Women in Indian Parliaments (2013): Legislative bodies in India [online]. [cit. 04.02.2013] Available at: URL:

  • World Factbook (2013): Washington DC: Central Intelligence Agency [online]. [cit. 01.04.2013] Available at: URL:

  • YOUNG K. (1987): Introduction. In: Sharma A. [ed.]: Women in World Religions (pp. 1–36). Albany State University of New York Press.

  • ZUCKERMAN P. (2007): Atheism: Contemporary Rates and Patterns. In: Martin M. [ed.]: Cambridge Companion to Atheism (pp. 47–69). Cambridge University of Cambridge Press.

Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.870
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.858

CiteScore 2018: 2.07

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.445
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.877

Cited By
Gesamte Zeit Letztes Jahr Letzte 30 Tage
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 13525 9118 885
PDF Downloads 7954 5529 625