A Curse of Coal? Exploring Unintended Regional Consequences of Coal Energy in The Czech Republic

Open access


Focusing on coal energy from a geographical perspective, the unintended regional consequences of coal mining and combustion in the Czech Republic are discussed and analysed in terms of the environmental injustice and resource curse theories. The explorative case study attempts to identify significant associations between the spatially uneven distribution of coal power plants and the environmental and socioeconomic characteristics and development trends of affected areas. The findings indicate that the coal industries have contributed to slightly above average incomes and pensions, and have provided households with some technical services such as district heating. However, these positive effects have come at high environmental and health costs paid by the local populations. Above average rates of unemployment, homelessness and crime indicate that the benefits have been unevenly distributed economically. A higher proportion of uneducated people and ethnic minorities in affected districts suggest that coal energy is environmentally unjust.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • ALLDRED M. SHRADER-FRECHETTE K. (2009): Environmental injustice in siting nuclear plants. Environmental Justice Vol. 2 No. 2 p. 85–96.

  • ARMSTRONG M. BECERRA M. FOLEY L. A. A. LOOMIS N. (2009): Environmental Justice: Mapping Coal Power Plants in Illinois and Chicago. [online] [cit. 01.11.2013]. Available at: http://gis.depaul.edu/shwang/CommunityOutreach/GEO242_Service_ Learning_Project/GEO242_Win0809_LVEJO_final_ report.pdf

  • BLACK D. McKINNISH T. SANDERS S. (2005): The Economic Impact of The Coal Boom And Bust. The Economic Journal Vol. 115 No. 503 p. 449–476.

  • Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF) (2013): Renewable Energy Now Cheaper Than New Fossil Fuels in Australia. [online] [cit. 01.11.2013] Available at: http://about.bnef.com/press-releases/renewable-energy-now-cheaper-than-new-fossil-fuels-in-australia/

  • BUDNITZ R. J. HOLDREN J. P (1976): Social and. Environmental Costs of Energy Systems. Annual Review of Energy Vol. 1 p. 553–580.

  • BURTRAW D. KRUPNICK A. SAMPSON G. (2012): The True Cost of Electric Power. RFF Report Resources for the Future Washington DC. [online] [cit. 01.11.2013] Available at: http://www.rff.org/RFF/Documents/RFF- Rpt-BurtrawKrupnick%20TrueCosts.pdf

  • ČEZ (2013): Významná data z historie české elektroenergetiky. [online] [cit. 01.11.2013] Available at: http://www.cez. cz/cs/vyzkum-a-vzdelavani/pro-zajemce-o-informace/histore-a-soucasnost/vyznamna-data.html

  • DOMENECH J. (2008): Mineral resource abundance and regional growth in Spain 1860–2000. Journal of International Development Vol. 20 No. 8 p. 1122–1135.

  • ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCY (EPA) (2004): Environmental Justice. [online] [cit. 01.11.2013] Available at: www.epa.gov/compliance/environmentaljustice/index.html

  • EPSTEIN P R. BUONOCORE J. J. ECKERLE K. HENDRY M. STOUT B. M. HEINBERG R. CLAPP R. W. MAY B. REINHART N. L. AHERN M. M. DOSHI S. K. GLUSTROM L. (2011): Full cost accounting for the life cycle of coal. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences No. 1219 p. 73–98.

  • ERU (2011): Roční zpráva o provozu ES ČR 2010. [online] [cit. 01.11.2013] Available at: http://eru.cz/user_data/files/statistika_elektro/rocni_zprava/2010/

  • Euracoal (2011): Country profiles: Czech Republic. [online] [cit. 01.11.2013] Available at: http://www.euracoal.be/pages/layout1sp.php?idpage=70

  • FISHER J. B. KELLY M. ROMM J. (2006): Scales of environmental justice: Combining GIS and spatial analysis for air toxics in West Oakland California. Health & Place Vol. 12 No. 4 p. 701–714.

  • FORKENBROCK D. J. SCHWEITZER L. A. (1999). Environmental Justice in Transportation Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association. Vol. 65 No. 1 p. 96–116.

  • FRANKS D. BRERETON D. MORAN C. (2010): Managing the cumulative impacts of coal mining on regional communities and environments in Australia. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal Vol. 28 No. 4 p. 299–312.

  • FRANTÁL B. KUNC J. (2011): Wind turbines in tourism landscapes: Czech experience. Annals of Tourism Research Vol. 38 No. 2 p. 499–519.

  • FREESE B. (2003): Coal: A Human History. Cambridge: Basic Books 320 pp.

  • FREUDENBURG W. R. (1992): Addictive Economies: Extractive Industries and Vulnerable Localities in a Changing World Ekonomy 1. Rural Sociology Vol. 57 No. 3 p. 305–332.

  • FREUDENBURG W. R. GRAMLING R. (1998): Linked to what? Economic linkages in an extractive economy. Society & Natural Resources Vol. 11 No. 6 p. 569–586.

  • GROSS C. (2007): Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance. Energy policy Vol. 35 No. 5 p. 2727–2736.

  • HAJKOWICZ S. A. HEYENGA S. MOFFAT K. (2011): The relationship between mining and socio-economic well-being in Australia’s regions. Resources Policy Vol. 36 No. 1 p. 30–38.

  • HANSLIAN J. HOŠEK J. ŠTEKL J. (2008): Odhad realizovatelného potenciálu větrné energie na území ČR. Praha Ústav fyziky atmosféry AV ČR 32 pp.

  • HEINBERG R. FRIDLEY D. (2010): The End of Cheap Coal. Nature Vol. 468 No. 1 p. 367–369.

  • HIGGINBOTHAM N. FREEMAN S. CONNOR L. ALBRECHT G. (2010): Environmental injustice and air pollution in coal affected communities Hunter Valley Australia. Health and Place Vol. 16 No. 2 p. 259–266.

  • HOHMEYER O. (1988): Social Costs of Energy Consumption. Springer-Verlag Berlin 120 pp.

  • IEA (2012): Medium-Term Coal Market Report 2012: Market Trends and Projections to 2017 148 pp.

  • KOMISE ŽIVOTNÍHO PROSTŘEDÍ – KŽP AV ČR (2013): Aktualizované stanovisko Komise pro životní prostředí Akademie věd ČR k problematice tzv. „územních ekologických limitů těžby” v Severočeské hnědouhelné pánvi. [online] [cit. 01.11.2013] Available at: http://www.koreny.cz/news/aktualizovane-stanovisko-komise- prozivotni-prostredi-akademie-ved-cr-k-problematice- tzv-uzemnich-ekologickychlimitu-tezby-v-severoceske- hnedouhelne-panvi-shp-/

  • KOŘAN J. ŽEBERA K. (1955): Přehledné dějiny Československého hornictví. Praha: ČSAV 214 pp.

  • KOTOUŠ J. JUROŠKOVÁ L. (2013): Beyond the Limits. Mining Journal Issue MJ 17/05/13 [online] [cit. 01.11.2013] Available at: http://www.mining-journal. com/reports/beyond-the-limits

  • KREWITT W. (2002): External costs of energy – do the answers match the questions? Looking back at 10 years of ExternE. Energy Policy Vol. 30 No. 10 p. 839–848.

  • KREWITT W. HECK T. TRUKENMULLER A. FRIEDRICH R. (1999): Environmental damage costs from fossil electricity generation in Germany and Europe. Energy Policy Vol. 27 No. 3 p. 173–183.

  • KUBÁŇOVÁ J. (2007): Útlum těžby: Impulz k oživení Ústeckého kraje Brno Hnutí Duha 12 pp.

  • LATZKO D. A. (2011): Coal Mining and Regional Economic Development in Pennsylvania 1810–1980. Economies et Sociétés (Serie 'Histoire Economique Quantitative') No. 44 p. 1627–1649.

  • LOCKIE S. FRANETTOVICH M. PETKOVA-TIMMER V ROLFE J. IVANOVA G. (2009): Coal mining and. the resource community cycle: a longitudinal assessment of the social impacts of the Coppabella coal mine. Environmental Impact Assessment Review Vol. 29 No. 5 p. 330–339.

  • MAHAPATRA D. SHUKLA P DHAR S. (2012): External. cost of coal based electricity generation: A tale of Ahmedabad city. Energy Policy Vol. 49 p. 253–265.

  • ŘÍHA M. STOKLASA J. LAFAROVÁ M. DEJMAL I. MAREK J. PAKOSTA P (2005): Environmental Mining. Limits in North Bohemian Lignite Region. Praha Společnost pro krajinu 60 pp.

  • SAHA S. PATTANAYAK S. K. SILLS E. O. SINGHA A. K. (2011): Under-mining health: environmental justice and mining in India. Health and Place Vol. 17 No. 1 p. 140–148.

  • SHANDRO J. A. VEIGA M. M. SHOVELLER J. SCOBLE M. KOEHOORN M. (2011): Perspectives on community health issues and the mining boom–bust cycle. Resources Policy Vol. 36 No. 2 p. 178–186.

  • SCHLISSEL D. SMITH A. WILSON R. (2008): Coal-Fired Power Plant Construction Costs. Cambridge Synapse Energy Economics Inc. 7 pp.

  • SIPES T. (2010): The Polluting of a Nation: Surface Coal Mining In America. [online] [cit. 01.11.2013] Available at: http://apus.academia.edu/ThomasSipes

  • SMOLOVÁ I. (2008): Těžba nerostných surovin v ČR po roce 1989 a její relevantní geografické aspekty. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci. 195 pp.

  • TAYLOR J. SCAMBARY B. (2005): Indigenous people and the Pilbara mining boom: a baseline for regional participation. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research Monograph Canberra ANUE Press No. 25. xviii+165pp.

  • TOKE D. (2005): Explaining wind power planning outcomes: some findings from a study in England and Wales. Energy Policy Vol. 33 No. 12 p. 1527–1539.

  • VAN DER HORST D. (2007): NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy sitting controversies. Energy Policy Vol. 35 No. 5 p. 2705–2714.

  • VISCUSI W. K. MAGAT W. A. DREYFUS M. GENTRY W. CARLIN A. (1992): Environmentally Responsible Energy Pricing Interim Draft Report on Efficient Energy Pricing Project on Economics Research for Long-Term Environmental Risks and Pollution Prevention. 88 pp. [online] Available at: http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eerm.nsf/vwAN/EE-0070B. pdf/$file/EE-0070B.pdf

  • WEBB G. W. (1967): Factors Affecting the Location of Coal-Burning Steam-Electric Generating Plants. The Professional Geographer Vol. 19 No. 4 p. 171–174.

  • WENG Z. MUDD G. M. MARTIN T. BOYLE C. A. (2012): Pollutant loads from coal mining in Australia: Discerning trends from the National Pollutant Inventory (NPI). Environmental Science & Policy Vol.s 19/20 p. 78–89.

  • YANG A. CUI Y. (2012): Global Coal Risk Assessment: Data Analysis and Market Research. WRI Working Paper. World Resources Institute Washington DC. [online] [cit. 01.11.2013] Available at: http://www.wri.org/publication/global-coal-risk-assessment

  • ZULLIG K. J. HENDRYX M. (2010): A comparative analysis of health-related quality of life for residents of US countries with and without coal mining. Public Health Reports Vol. 125 No. 4 p. 548–555.

Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.870
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.858

CiteScore 2018: 2.07

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.445
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.877

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 462 268 16
PDF Downloads 190 128 10