A Curse of Coal? Exploring Unintended Regional Consequences of Coal Energy in The Czech Republic

Open access


Focusing on coal energy from a geographical perspective, the unintended regional consequences of coal mining and combustion in the Czech Republic are discussed and analysed in terms of the environmental injustice and resource curse theories. The explorative case study attempts to identify significant associations between the spatially uneven distribution of coal power plants and the environmental and socioeconomic characteristics and development trends of affected areas. The findings indicate that the coal industries have contributed to slightly above average incomes and pensions, and have provided households with some technical services such as district heating. However, these positive effects have come at high environmental and health costs paid by the local populations. Above average rates of unemployment, homelessness and crime indicate that the benefits have been unevenly distributed economically. A higher proportion of uneducated people and ethnic minorities in affected districts suggest that coal energy is environmentally unjust.

ALLDRED, M., SHRADER-FRECHETTE, K. (2009): Environmental injustice in siting nuclear plants. Environmental Justice, Vol. 2, No. 2, p. 85–96.

ARMSTRONG, M., BECERRA, M., FOLEY, L. A. A., LOOMIS, N. (2009): Environmental Justice: Mapping Coal Power Plants in Illinois and Chicago. [online] [cit. 01.11.2013]. Available at: http://gis.depaul.edu/shwang/CommunityOutreach/GEO242_Service_ Learning_Project/GEO242_Win0809_LVEJO_final_ report.pdf

BLACK, D., McKINNISH, T., SANDERS, S. (2005): The Economic Impact of The Coal Boom And Bust. The Economic Journal, Vol. 115, No. 503, p. 449–476.

Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF) (2013): Renewable Energy Now Cheaper Than New Fossil Fuels in Australia. [online] [cit. 01.11.2013] Available at: http://about.bnef.com/press-releases/renewable-energy-now-cheaper-than-new-fossil-fuels-in-australia/

BUDNITZ, R. J., HOLDREN, J. P (1976): Social and. Environmental Costs of Energy Systems. Annual Review of Energy, Vol. 1, p. 553–580.

BURTRAW, D., KRUPNICK, A., SAMPSON, G. (2012): The True Cost of Electric Power. RFF Report, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. [online] [cit. 01.11.2013] Available at: http://www.rff.org/RFF/Documents/RFF- Rpt-BurtrawKrupnick%20TrueCosts.pdf

ČEZ (2013): Významná data z historie české elektroenergetiky. [online] [cit. 01.11.2013] Available at: http://www.cez. cz/cs/vyzkum-a-vzdelavani/pro-zajemce-o-informace/histore-a-soucasnost/vyznamna-data.html

DOMENECH, J. (2008): Mineral resource abundance and regional growth in Spain, 1860–2000. Journal of International Development, Vol. 20, No. 8, p. 1122–1135.

ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCY (EPA) (2004): Environmental Justice. [online] [cit. 01.11.2013] Available at: www.epa.gov/compliance/environmentaljustice/index.html

EPSTEIN, P R., BUONOCORE, J. J., ECKERLE, K., HENDRY, M., STOUT, B. M., HEINBERG, R., CLAPP, R. W., MAY, B., REINHART, N. L., AHERN, M. M., DOSHI, S. K., GLUSTROM, L. (2011): Full cost accounting for the life cycle of coal. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, No. 1219, p. 73–98.

ERU (2011): Roční zpráva o provozu ES ČR 2010. [online] [cit. 01.11.2013] Available at: http://eru.cz/user_data/files/statistika_elektro/rocni_zprava/2010/

Euracoal (2011): Country profiles: Czech Republic. [online] [cit. 01.11.2013] Available at: http://www.euracoal.be/pages/layout1sp.php?idpage=70

FISHER, J. B., KELLY, M., ROMM, J. (2006): Scales of environmental justice: Combining GIS and spatial analysis for air toxics in West Oakland, California. Health & Place, Vol. 12, No. 4, p. 701–714.

FORKENBROCK, D. J., SCHWEITZER, L. A. (1999). Environmental Justice in Transportation Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association. Vol. 65, No. 1, p. 96–116.

FRANKS, D., BRERETON, D., MORAN, C. (2010): Managing the cumulative impacts of coal mining on regional communities and environments in Australia. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 28, No. 4, p. 299–312.

FRANTÁL, B., KUNC, J. (2011): Wind turbines in tourism landscapes: Czech experience. Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 38, No. 2, p. 499–519.

FREESE, B. (2003): Coal: A Human History. Cambridge: Basic Books, 320 pp.

FREUDENBURG, W. R. (1992): Addictive Economies: Extractive Industries and Vulnerable Localities in a Changing World Ekonomy 1. Rural Sociology, Vol. 57, No. 3, p. 305–332.

FREUDENBURG, W. R., GRAMLING, R. (1998): Linked to what? Economic linkages in an extractive economy. Society & Natural Resources, Vol. 11, No. 6, p. 569–586.

GROSS, C. (2007): Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance. Energy policy, Vol. 35, No. 5, p. 2727–2736.

HAJKOWICZ, S. A., HEYENGA, S., MOFFAT, K. (2011): The relationship between mining and socio-economic well-being in Australia’s regions. Resources Policy, Vol. 36, No. 1, p. 30–38.

HANSLIAN, J., HOŠEK, J., ŠTEKL, J. (2008): Odhad realizovatelného potenciálu větrné energie na území ČR. Praha, Ústav fyziky atmosféry AV ČR, 32 pp.

HEINBERG, R., FRIDLEY, D. (2010): The End of Cheap Coal. Nature, Vol. 468, No. 1, p. 367–369.

HIGGINBOTHAM, N., FREEMAN, S., CONNOR, L., ALBRECHT, G. (2010): Environmental injustice and air pollution in coal affected communities, Hunter Valley, Australia. Health and Place, Vol. 16, No. 2, p. 259–266.

HOHMEYER, O. (1988): Social Costs of Energy Consumption. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 120 pp.

IEA (2012): Medium-Term Coal Market Report 2012: Market Trends and Projections to 2017, 148 pp.

KOMISE ŽIVOTNÍHO PROSTŘEDÍ – KŽP AV ČR (2013): Aktualizované stanovisko Komise pro životní prostředí Akademie věd ČR k problematice tzv. „územních ekologických limitů těžby” v Severočeské hnědouhelné pánvi. [online] [cit. 01.11.2013] Available at: http://www.koreny.cz/news/aktualizovane-stanovisko-komise- prozivotni-prostredi-akademie-ved-cr-k-problematice- tzv-uzemnich-ekologickychlimitu-tezby-v-severoceske- hnedouhelne-panvi-shp-/

KOŘAN, J., ŽEBERA, K. (1955): Přehledné dějiny Československého hornictví. Praha: ČSAV 214 pp.,

KOTOUŠ, J., JUROŠKOVÁ, L. (2013): Beyond the Limits. Mining Journal, Issue MJ 17/05/13, [online] [cit. 01.11.2013] Available at: http://www.mining-journal. com/reports/beyond-the-limits

KREWITT, W. (2002): External costs of energy – do the answers match the questions? Looking back at 10 years of ExternE. Energy Policy, Vol. 30, No. 10, p. 839–848.

KREWITT, W., HECK, T., TRUKENMULLER, A., FRIEDRICH, R. (1999): Environmental damage costs from fossil electricity generation in Germany and Europe. Energy Policy, Vol. 27, No. 3, p. 173–183.

KUBÁŇOVÁ, J. (2007): Útlum těžby: Impulz k oživení Ústeckého kraje Brno, Hnutí Duha, 12 pp.

LATZKO, D. A. (2011): Coal Mining and Regional Economic Development in Pennsylvania, 1810–1980. Economies et Sociétés (Serie 'Histoire Economique Quantitative'), No. 44, p. 1627–1649.

LOCKIE, S., FRANETTOVICH, M., PETKOVA-TIMMER, V ROLFE, J., IVANOVA, G. (2009): Coal mining and., the resource community cycle: a longitudinal assessment of the social impacts of the Coppabella coal mine. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 29, No. 5, p. 330–339.

MAHAPATRA, D., SHUKLA, P DHAR, S. (2012): External., cost of coal based electricity generation: A tale of Ahmedabad city. Energy Policy, Vol. 49, p. 253–265.

ŘÍHA, M., STOKLASA, J., LAFAROVÁ, M., DEJMAL, I., MAREK, J., PAKOSTA, P (2005): Environmental Mining. Limits in North Bohemian Lignite Region. Praha, Společnost pro krajinu, 60 pp.

SAHA, S., PATTANAYAK, S. K., SILLS, E. O., SINGHA, A. K. (2011): Under-mining health: environmental justice and mining in India. Health and Place, Vol. 17, No. 1, p. 140–148.

SHANDRO, J. A., VEIGA, M. M., SHOVELLER, J., SCOBLE, M., KOEHOORN, M. (2011): Perspectives on community health issues and the mining boom–bust cycle. Resources Policy, Vol. 36, No. 2, p. 178–186.

SCHLISSEL, D., SMITH, A., WILSON, R. (2008): Coal-Fired Power Plant Construction Costs. Cambridge, Synapse Energy Economics Inc., 7 pp.

SIPES, T. (2010): The Polluting of a Nation: Surface Coal Mining In America. [online] [cit. 01.11.2013] Available at: http://apus.academia.edu/ThomasSipes

SMOLOVÁ, I. (2008): Těžba nerostných surovin v ČR po roce 1989 a její relevantní geografické aspekty. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci. 195 pp.

TAYLOR, J., SCAMBARY, B. (2005): Indigenous people and the Pilbara mining boom: a baseline for regional participation. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research Monograph, Canberra, ANUE Press, No. 25., xviii+165pp.

TOKE, D. (2005): Explaining wind power planning outcomes: some findings from a study in England and Wales. Energy Policy, Vol. 33, No. 12, p. 1527–1539.

VAN DER HORST, D. (2007): NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy sitting controversies. Energy Policy, Vol. 35, No. 5, p. 2705–2714.

VISCUSI, W. K., MAGAT, W. A., DREYFUS, M., GENTRY, W., CARLIN, A. (1992): Environmentally Responsible Energy Pricing, Interim Draft Report on Efficient Energy Pricing, Project on Economics Research for Long-Term Environmental Risks and Pollution Prevention. 88 pp. [online] Available at: http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eerm.nsf/vwAN/EE-0070B. pdf/$file/EE-0070B.pdf

WEBB, G. W. (1967): Factors Affecting the Location of Coal-Burning Steam-Electric Generating Plants. The Professional Geographer, Vol. 19, No. 4, p. 171–174.

WENG, Z., MUDD, G. M., MARTIN, T., BOYLE, C. A. (2012): Pollutant loads from coal mining in Australia: Discerning trends from the National Pollutant Inventory (NPI). Environmental Science & Policy, Vol.s 19/20, p. 78–89.

YANG, A., CUI, Y. (2012): Global Coal Risk Assessment: Data Analysis and Market Research. WRI Working Paper. World Resources Institute, Washington DC. [online] [cit. 01.11.2013] Available at: http://www.wri.org/publication/global-coal-risk-assessment

ZULLIG, K. J., HENDRYX, M. (2010): A comparative analysis of health-related quality of life for residents of US countries with and without coal mining. Public Health Reports, Vol. 125, No. 4, p. 548–555.

Moravian Geographical Reports

The Journal of Institute of Geonics of the Czech Academy of Sciences (CAS)

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.435
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.500

CiteScore 2017: 1.83

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.408
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.090

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 336 333 29
PDF Downloads 122 122 11