The Spatial Pattern of Brownfields and Characteristics of Redeveloped Sites in the Ostrava Metropolitan Area (Czech Republic)

Open access


Differences between brownfields and redeveloped sites in the Ostrava metropolitan area are subject to analysis in this paper. Environmental burden and former functional use were identified as statistically significant characteristics of such differences. In addition, relations between selected attributes of brownfields and redeveloped sites were analyzed using the “if-then” decision rules of the rough set method. In this way, the research demonstrated the significance of spatial aspects and identified two fundamental types of brownfields in the model area. The first type is represented by agricultural brownfields in the hinterland zone, that are characterized by a complicated ownership structure. Brownfields of the second type are located particularly in the inner city morphogenetic zone, and are characterized by potential problems with environmental burden. In this context, brownfields and redeveloped sites differ respectively in the combination of these characteristics.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • ADAMS D. DISBERRY A. HUTCHISON N. MUNJOMA T. (2001): Ownership constraints to brownfield redevelopment. Environment and Planning A Vol. 33 No. 3 p. 453-477.

  • ALKER S. JOY V. ROBERTS P. SMITH N. (2000): The definition of brownfield. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management Vol. 43 No. 1 p. 49-69.

  • BRUINSMA F. NIJKAMP P. VREEKER R. (2002): A comparative industrial profile analysis of urban regions in Western Europe: an application of rough set classification. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie Vol. 93 No. 4 p. 454-463.

  • CONROY M. M. BERKE P. R. (2004): What makes a good sustainable development plan? An analysis of factors that influence principles of sustainable development. Environment and Planning A Vol. 36 No. 8 p. 1381-1396.

  • DE SOUSA C. (2006): Unearthing the benefits of brownfield to green space projects: an examination of project use and quality of life impacts. Local Environment Vol. 11 No. 5 p. 577-600.

  • DOETSCH P. RÜPKE A. (1998): Revitalisierung von Altstandorten versus Inanspruchnahme von Naturflächen. Berlin Umweltbundesamt 589 pp.

  • FLORIDA R. (1995): The industrial transformation of the Great Lakes Region. In Cooke P.: The rise of the Rustbelt. London UCL Press p. 162-176.

  • HEMPHILL L. BERRY J. MCGREAL S. (2004): An indicator-based approach to measuring sustainable urban regeneration performance: part 1 conceptual foundations and methodological framework. Urban Studies Vol. 41 No. 4 p. 725-756.

  • HOLL A. (2004): Manufacturing location and impacts of road transport infrastructure: empirical evidence from Spain. Regional Science and Urban Economics Vol. 34 No. 3 p. 341-363.

  • KLUSÁČEK P. KREJČÍ T. KUNC J. MARTINÁT S. NOVÁKOVÁ E. (2011): The post-industrial landscape in relation to local self-government in the Czech Republic. Moravian Geographical Reports Vol. 19 No. 4 p. 18-28.

  • KOLL-SCHRETZENMAYR M. (2000): Strategien zur Umnutzung von Industrie und Gewerbebrachen. Zürich Hochschullverlag 269 pp.

  • KUNC J. KLUSÁČEK P. MARTINÁT S. (2011): Percepce a lokalizace urbánních brownfields: podobnosti a rozdíly na příkladu Brna a Ostravy. Urbanismus a územní rozvoj Vol. 14 No. 1 p. 13-17.

  • KUNC J. TONEV P. (2008): Funkční a prostorová diferenciace brownfields - příklad města Brna. Regionální studia Vol. 1 No. 1 p. 30-37.

  • NIJKAMP P. BURCH VAN DEN J. VINDINGI G. (2002): A comparative institutional evaluation of public-private partnership in Dutch urban land-use and revitalisation projects. Urban Studies Vol. 39 No. 10 p. 1865-1880.

  • NOVOSÁK J. (2009): Prostorová analýza brownfields na Ostravsku. Ostrava Ostravská univerzita v Ostravě 133 pp.

  • PAWLAK Z. SLOWINSKI R. (1994): Rough set approach to multi-attribute decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research Vol. 72 No. 3 p. 443-459.

  • RYDVALOVÁ P. ŽIŽKA M. (2006): Ekonomické souvislosti revitalizace brownfields. Politická ekonomie Vol. 54 No. 5 p. 632-645.

  • SVOBODOVÁ H. VĚŽNÍK A. (2009): To the problems of agricultural brownfields in the Czech Republic - case study of the Vysočina region. Agricultural Economics - Czech Vol. 55 No. 11 p. 550-556.

  • SÝKORA L. (2003): Suburbanizace a její společenské důsledky. Sociologický časopis Vol. 39 No. 2 p. 217-233.

  • SÝKOROVÁ I. (2007): Pražská brownfields: příležitost i hrozba pro rozvoj metropole. Geografie Vol. 112 No. 4 p. 250-265.

  • VAISHAR A. JAKEŠOVÁ L. NÁPLAVOVÁ M. (2011): Current problems in the South-Moravian rural landscape. European Countryside Vol. 3 No. 4 p. 265-281.

  • VOJVODÍKOVÁ B. (2004): Některé možnosti využití opuštěných pozemků po důlních podnicích. Urbanismus a územní rozvoj Vol. 7 No. 5 p. 12-16.

  • VOJVODÍKOVÁ B. POTUŽNÍK M. BÜRGERMEISTEROVÁ R. (2011): The database on brownfields in Ostrava (Czech Republic): some approaches to categorization. Moravian Geographical Reports Vol. 19 No. 4 p. 50-60.

  • YOUNT K. R. (2003): What are brownfields? Finding a conceptual definition. Environmental Practice Vol. 6 No. 1 p. 25-33.

Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.870
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.858

CiteScore 2018: 2.07

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.445
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.877

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 244 77 6
PDF Downloads 107 46 1