Comparison of the Models of the Air Gauge Static Characteristics

Open access


In the article, the authors analyze and discuss several models used to the calculation of air gauge characteristics. The model based on the actual mass flow (which is smaller than the theoretical one) was proposed, too. Calculations have been performed with a dedicated software with the second critical parameters included. The air gauge static characteristics calculated with 6 different models were compared with the experimental data. It appeared that the second critical parameters model (SCP) provided the characteristics close to the experimental ones, with an error of ca. 3% within the air gauge measuring range.

[1] M. Mennesson. High precision measurement method of lengths and thicknesses. Comptes Rendus des Seances de l’Academie des Sciences, 194(25.4.1932):1459–1461, 1932.

[2] W.J. Gluchow and A.A. Tupolew. Non-contact pneumatic measuring control devices for the production of workpieces with discontinuous surfaces. Feingerätetechnik, 23(2):69–73, 1974. (in German).

[3] E.I. Ped. Optimization of the constructional elements choice of the air gauges designed for the dynamic measurements. Measurement Techniques, 7:29–31, 1981. (in Russian).

[4] F.T. Farago and Curtis M.A. Handbook of Dimensional Measurement. Industrial Press Inc., New York, 1994.

[5] G. Schuetz. Pushing the limits of air gaging-and keeping them there. Quality, 54(7):22–26, 2015.

[6] G. Schuetz. Air gaging gets better with age. Quality, 3:28–32, 2008.

[7] L. Finkelstein. Reflections on a century of measurement science as an academic discipline. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 14(4):635–638, 2007.

[8] M. Rucki, B. Barisic, and G. Varga. Air gauges as a part of the dimensional inspection systems. Measurement, 43(1):83–91, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2009.07.001.

[9] T. Janiczek and J. Janiczek. Linear dynamic system identification in the frequency domain using fractional derivatives. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 17(2):279–288, 2010. 10.2478/v10178-010-0024-6.

[10] V.B. Bokov. Pneumatic gauge steady-state modelling by theoretical and empirical methods. Measurement, 44(2):303–311, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2009.01.015.

[11] B. Dobrowolski, Z. Kabza, and A. Spyra. Digital simulation of air flow through a nozzle of pneumatic gauge. In Proc. 33rd Annual Conference JUREMA, pages 67–70, 1988.

[12] M.N. Abhari, M. Ghodsian, M. Vaghefi, and N. Panahpur. Experimental and numerical simulation of flow in a 90° bend. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 21(3):292–298, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2010.03.002.

[13] J. Peng, X. Fu, and Y. Chen. Response of a swirlmeter to oscillatory flow. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 19(2):107–115, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2007.10.002.

[14] C. Crnojevic, G. Roy, A. Bettahar, and P. Florent. The influence of the regulator diameter and injection nozzle geometry on the flow structure in pneumatic dimensional control systems. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 119:609–615, 1997. doi: 10.1115/1.2819288.

[15] C. Jermak, editor. Theory and Practice of Air Gauging. Poznan University of Technology, 2011.

[16] T. Kiczkowiak and S. Grymek. Critical pressure ratio b as defined in iso 6358 and iso 6953 standards. Pomiary Automatyka Kontrola (Measurement, Automation, Monitoring), 57:559–562, 2011. (in Polish).

[17] A Cellary and C.J. Jermak. Dynamics of a cascade pneumatic sensor for length measurements. In Proc. of Optoelectronic and Electronic Sensors II, pages 36–39. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1997. doi: 10.1117/12.266719.

[18] A.V. Deych. Technical gasodynamics. Gosenergoizdat, Moscow, 1961. (in Russian).

[19] M. Kabacinski, C. T Lachowicz, and J. Pospolita. Numerical analysis of flow averaging tubes in the vortex-shedding regime. Archive of Mechanical Engineering, 60(2):283–297, 2013. doi: 10.2478/meceng-2013-0018.

[20] Kościelny W. and Woźniak C. Models of the flow characteristics of the pneumatic restrictors. In Proc. PNEUMA’95, pages 73–82, 1995. (in Polish).

[21] Kościelny W. and Woźniak C. Experimental evaluation of the models of the pneumatic restrictors flow characteristics. In Proc. PNEUMA’95, pages 83–92, 1995. (in Polish).

[22] Automation of the pneumatic dimensional measurement in mechanical engineering. Mashinostroyeniye, Moscow, 1964. (in Russian).

[23] C.J. Jermak. Methods of shaping the metrological characteristics of air gages. Strojniski Vestnik/Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 56(6):385–390, 2010.

[24] R.J. Soboczyński. Investigations on the metrological properties of high pressure air gauges. PhD thesis, Wrocław Technical University, 1977. (in Polish).

[25] Calculation of the high pressure air gauges characteristics. Journal Measuring Techniques, 6:107, 1971.

[26] Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Warszawa, Główny Urząd Miar, 1999. (in Polish).

[27] C.J. Jermak and M. Rucki. Air gauging: Static and dynamic characteristics. IFSA, Barcelona, Spain, 2012.

[28] Cz.J. Jermak and M. Rucki. Air gauging: Still some room for development. AASCIT Communication, 2(2):29–34, 2015.

Archive of Mechanical Engineering

The Journal of Committee on Machine Building of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

CiteScore 2016: 0.44

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.162
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.459


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 132 96 9
PDF Downloads 64 56 3