Modal Measurements and Model Corrections of A Large Stroke Compliant Mechanism

Open access

Abstract

In modelling flexure based mechanisms, generally flexures are modelled perfectly aligned and nominal values are assumed for the dimensions. To test the validity of these assumptions for a two Degrees Of Freedom (DOF) large stroke compliant mechanism, eigenfrequency and mode shape measurements are compared to results obtained with a flexible multibody model. The mechanism consists of eleven cross flexures and seven interconnecting bodies. From the measurements 30% lower eigenfrequencies are observed than those obtained with the model. With a simplified model, it is demonstrated that these differences can be attributed to wrongly assumed leaf spring thickness and misalignment of the leaf springs in the cross flexures. These manufacturing tolerances thus significantly affect the behaviour of the two DOF mechanism, even though it was designed using the exact constraint design principle. This design principle avoids overconstraints to limit internal stresses due to manufacturing tolerances, yet this paper shows clearly that manufacturing imperfections can still result in significantly different dynamic behaviour.

References

  • [1] Smith S.: Flexures: Elements of Elastic Mechanisms. Taylor & Francis, London, 2000.

  • [2] Howell L. L.: Compliant Mechanisms. Wiley, New York, 2001.

  • [3] Soemers H.J.M.R.: Design Principles for Precision Mechanisms. T-Pointprint, Enschede, 2010.

  • [4] Meijaard J.P., Brouwer D.M., Jonker J.B.: Analytical and experimental investigation of a parallel leaf spring guidance. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 23(1), pp. 77-97, 2010.

  • [5] Awtar S., Shimotsu K., Sen S.: Elastic averaging in flexure mechanisms: A three-beam par allelogram flexure case study. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics 2(4), art. no. 041006, 2010.

  • [6] Blanding D.L.: Exact Constraint: Machine Design Using Kinematic Principles. ASME Press, New York, 1999.

  • [7] Moronuki N.: Design of Silicon-Monolithic Flexure Stage with Selective Compliance. JSME International Journal, Series C: Mechanical Systems, Machine Elements and Manufacturing, 47(1), pp. 111-116, 2010.

  • [8] Hao G., Kong X.: A novel large-range XY compliant parallel manipulator with enhanced out-of-plane stiffness. Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME 134(6), art. no. 061009, 2012.

  • [9] Wiersma D.H., Boer S.E., Aarts R.G.K.M., and Brouwer D.M.: Design and performance optimization of large stroke spatial flexures. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics 9(1), 011016 (10 pages), 2013.

  • [10] Brouwer D.M., Folkersma K.G.P., Boer S.E., Aarts R.G.K.M.: Exact Constraint Design of a Two-Degree of Freedom Flexure-Based Mechanism. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics 5(4), 041011 (10 pages), 2013.

  • [11] Folkersma K.G.P., Boer S.E., Brouwer D.M., Herder J.L., Soemers H.M.J.R.: A 2-DOF Large Stroke Flexure Based Positioning Mechanism. DETC2012-70377, International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Chicago, 2012.

  • [12] Jonker J.B., Meijaard J.P.: SPACAR-computer program for dynamic analysis of flexible spatial mechanisms and manipulators. In: Schiehlen W. (ed.) Multibody Systems Handbook, pp. 123 143. Springer, Berlin, 1990.

  • [13] Sracic M.W., Allen M.S., Sumali H.: Identifying the Modal Properties of Nonlinear Structures Using Measured Free Response Time Histories from a Scanning Laser Doppler Vibrometer. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series 3, pp. 269-286, 2012.

  • [14] Sujatha C.: Vibration and acoustics: measurement and signal analysis. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill Education Private Ltd., 2010.

  • [15] Jonker J.B., Meijaard J.P.: A Finite Element Dynamic Analyses of Spatial Mechanisms with Flexible Links, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 76, pp. 17-40, 1989.

  • [16] Boer S., Aarts R., Meijaard J., Brouwer D., and Jonker J.: A non-linear two-node superelement for use in flexible multibody systems. Multibody System Dynamics 31 (4), pp. 405-431. DOI: 10.1007/s11044-013-9373-8.

  • [17] van der Auweraer H., Guillaume P., Verboven P., Vanlanduit S.: Application of a Fast-Stabilizing Frequency Domain Parameter Estimation Method. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, 123(4), pp. 651-658, 2001.

  • [18] Verboven P.: Frequency-Domain System Identification for Modal Analysis. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, 2002.

  • [19] Tjepkema D.: Active hard mount vibration isolation for precision equipment, 9789036534185, University of Twente, November, 2, 2012. DOI: 10.3990/1.9789036534185.

  • [20] Siglab S.: Estimating Transfer Functions with SigLab. DSP Technology Inc, United States of America, 1994.

  • [21] Cauberghe B., Guillaume P., Verboven P., Vanlanduit E., Parloo E.: On the influence of the parameter constraint on the stability of the poles and the discrimination capabilities of the stabilization diagrams. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 19 (5), pp. 989-1014, 2005.

  • [22] Balnies E.: Frequency Domain Identification of Structural Dynamics Using the Pole/Residue Parameterization. IMAC, 28, pp. 540-546, 1995.

  • [23] Bonisoli E., Delprete C., Esposito M., Mottershead J.E.: Structural Dynamics with Coincident Eigenvalues: Modelling and Testing. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series 3, pp. 325-337, 2011.

Archive of Mechanical Engineering

The Journal of Committee on Machine Building of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information


CiteScore 2016: 0.44

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.162
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.459

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 140 140 85
PDF Downloads 7 7 4