Since there is not enough data about milkability of the Jersey cows, the aim of this paper is to show basic milkability traits of this cattle breed depending on the parity and milk flow curve types. Cows had average daily production (DMY) of 22.23 kg, milk yield per milking (MYM) of 9.72 kg, and average and maximum milk flow about 1.66 and 2.49 kg/min, respectively. Statistical analysis showed that DMY and MYM of the cows in 4th parity was significantly (p---lt---0.05) higher comparing to cows in 1st and 3th parity. The duration of entirely milking is similar regarding the paritiesand only the cows in 3th and 4th differ significantly (p---lt---0.05). Regarding the effect of milk flow curve, the significant (p---lt---0.05) difference between unspecified and rectangular milk flow curve has been found for the average milk flow (AMF) and descending phase of the milk flow curve (TD). Cows with unspecified milk flow curve, have significantly (p---lt---0.05) lower AMF and longer TD compared to cows with rectangular curve. Cows with bimodal milk flow curve have significantly (p---lt---0.05) longer duration of the ascending phase compering to: unspecified, descending and rectangular. The results of this study have shown that Jersey cows have lower production and milk flow compared to other dairy cattle breeds. Nonetheless, they have uniform milkability traits, and a large representation of desirable milk flow curves which are associated with a beneficial effect on the udder health.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Trede J. Kalm E. (1989). Investigation of milkability and udder health. 1st communication: Adjustment of different measure of milkability and their relationship to milk performance. Züchtungskunde 61 440-450.
2. Taylor G. van der Sande L. Douglas R. (2009). Improving labour productivity in the primary sector. A joint dairy in sight and sustainable farming fund project. Technical report for dairy NZ farmer information service. https://www.dairynz.co.nz/publications
3. Jago J. G. Berry D. P. (2011). Association between herd size rate of expension and production breeding policy and reproduction in spring-calving dairy herds. Animal 5 1626-1633. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111000516 PMid:22440355
4. Berry D. P. Coughlan B. Enright B. Coughlan S. Burke M. (2013). Factors associated with milking characteristics in dairy cows J Dairy Sci. 96(9): 5943-5953. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6162 PMid:23810601
5. Groen F. Steine T. Colleau J. J. Pedersen J. Pribyl J. Reinsch N. (1997). Economic values in dairy cattle breeding with special reference to functional traits. Livest Prod Sci. 49 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(97)00041-9
6. Rensing S. (2005). New ways of dana recording and genetic evaluation for functional traits. The 26th European Holstein and Red Holstein Conference Session 2 1-3 Prague Czech Republic
7. Guler O. Yanar M. Aydin R. Bayram B. Dogru U. Kopuzlu S. (2009). Genetic and environmental parameters of milkability traits in Holstein Friesian cows. J Anim Vet Adv. 8 (1): 143-147.
8. Carlström C. Pettersson G. Johansson K. Stålhammar H. Philipsson J. (2009). Phenotypic and genetic variation in milk flow for dairy cattle in automatic milking systems. EAAP Session 1 (pp.1-7) Barcelona Spain
9. Gäde S. Stamer E. Junge W. Kalm E. (2006). Estimates of genetic parameters for milkability from automatic milking Livest Sci. 104 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.04.003
10. Gray K. A. Vacirca F. Bagnato A. Samoré A. B. Rossoni A. Maltecca C. (2011). Genetic evaluations for measures of the milk-flow curve in the Italian Brown Swiss population. J Dairy Sci. 94 960-970. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2759 PMid:21257064
11. Samoré A. B. Román-Ponce S. I. Vacirca F. Frigo E. Canavesi F. Bagnato A. Maltecca C. (2011). Bimodality and the genetics of milk flow traits in the Italian Holstein-Friesian breed. J Dairy Sci. 94 (8): 4081-4089. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3611 PMid:21787943
12. Sekerden O. Kuran M. (1991). Estimation of heritabilities of the speed of milk flow milking time and milk yield in Yersey cows of Karakoy State Farm Truk. J Vet Anim Sci. 16 86-92.
13. Povinelli M. Romani C. Degano L. Cassandro M. Dal Zotto R. Bittante G. (2003). Sources of variation and heritability estimates for milking speed in Italian Brown cows. Ital J Anim Sci. 2 (1): 70-72.
14. Lee D. H. Choudhary V. (2006). Study on milkability traits in Holstein cows. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 19 (3): 309-314. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.309
15. Zucali M. Bava L. Sandrucci A. Tamburini A. Piccinini R. Daprà V. Tonni M. Zecconi A. (2009). Milk flow pattern somatic cell countand teat apex scorein primiparous dairy cowsat the beginning of lactation. Ital J Anim Sci. 8 103-111. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.103
16. Juozaitiene V. Japertiene R. (2010). The milking speed heritability and fenotypic and genetic correlation with productivity milk yield and somatic cell count in lithuanian black-and white cows. Vet Zootec. 50 (72): 35-41.
17. Samoré A. B. Rizzi R. Rossoni A. Bagnato A. (2010). Genetic parameters for functional longevity type traits SCS milk flow and production in the Italian Brown Swiss. Ital J Anim Sci. 9 145-152. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2010.e28
18. Tamburini A. Bava L. Piccinini R. Zecconi A. Zucali M. Sandrucci A. (2010). Milk emission and udder health status in primiparous dairy cows during lactation. J Dairy Res. 77 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029909990240 PMid:19785911
19. Bruckmaier R. M. Blum J. W. (1996). Simultaneus recording of oxytocin release milk ejection and milk flow during milking of dairy cows with or without stimulation. J Dairy Res. 63 201-208. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029900031708 PMid:8861344
20. Sandrucci A. Tamburini A. Bava L. Zucali M. (2007). Factors affecting milk flow traits in dairy cows: results of a field study. J Dairy Sci. 90 (3): 1159-1167. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71602-8
21. Amin A. A. (2007). Genetic and permanent environmental variations in daily milk yield and milk flow rates in Hungarian Holstein Friesian. Arch Tierzucht. 50 (6): 535-548. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-50-535-2007
22. Aydin R. Yanar M. Guler O. Yuksel S. Ugur F. Turgut L. (2008). Stady on milkability traits in Brown Swess cows reared in eastern region of Turkey. J Anim Vet Adv. 7 1218-1222.
23. Antalík P. Strapák P. (2011). Effect of parity and lactation stage on milk flow characteristics of slovak Simmental dairy cows. Vet Med Zoot. 54 (76): 8-13.
24. Strapák P. Antalik P. Szencziová I. (2011). Milkability evaluation of Holstein dairy cows by Lactocorder. J Agrobiol. 28 (2): 139-146. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10146-011-0015-6
25. Bobić T. Mijić P. Gregić M. Ivkić Z. Baban M. (2013). The influence of ordinal number and stage of lactation on milkabilty traits in Holstein cows. Mljekarstvo 63 (3): 172-179. [in Croatian]
26. Tančin V. Ipema B. Hogewerf P. (2005). The quarter milk flow parameters influenced by stage of lactation and milkability in multiparous dairy cows. In: V. Tančin S. Mihina M. Uhrinca (Ed.) Physiological and technical aspects of machine milking (pp.33-38). Rome: ICAR Technical Series.
27. Göft H. Duda J. Dethlefsen A. Worstorff H. (1994). Studies on the breeding use of milkability in cattle taking milk flow curves into account. Züchtungskunde 66:24-37. [in German]
28. Mijić P. Knežević I. Grgurić D. Gutzmirtl H. Rimac D. Baban M. (2003). The evolution of Holstein Breed cows’ health udder of different provenance according to somatic cell count in milk. Agric Conspec Sci. 68 (3): 227-231.
29. Edwards J. P. Jago J. G. Lopez-Villalobos N. (2014). Analysis of milking characteristics in New Zealand dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 97 259-269. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7051 PMid:24210490
30. Bobić T. (2014). Correlation between morphological milkability and udder health characteristics) Doctoral Thesis. University of J. J. Strossmayer in Osijek Faculty of Agriculture in Osijek. Republic of Croatia [in Croatian]
31. Bobić T. Mijić P. Gregić M. Gantner V. (2018). The differences in milkability milk and health traits in dairy cattle due to parity Mljekarstvo 68 (1): 57-63. https://doi.org/10.15567/mljekarstvo.2018.0107
32. Petersen M. L. Hansen L. B. Young C. V. Miller K. P. (1986). Rates of milk flow and milking times resulting from selection for milk yield. J Dairy Sci. 69 556-563. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(86)80438-6
33. Firk R. Stamer E. Junge W. Krieter J. (2002). Systematic effects on activity milk yield milk flow rate and electrical conductivity. Arch Tierzucht. 45 (3): 213-222. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-45-213-2002
34. Tančin V. Ipema B. Hogewerf P. Mačuhova J. (2006). Sources of variation in milk flow characteristics at udder and quarter levels. J Dairy Sci. 89 978-988. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72163-4
35. Porcionato M. A. F. Soares W. V. B. Reis C. B. M. Cortinhas C. S. Mestieri L. Santos M. V. (2010). Milk flow teat morphology and subclinical mastitis prevalence in Gir cows. Pesq Agropec Bras. 45 (12): 1507-1512. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2010001200023
36. Rasmussen M. D. (2004). Overmilking and teat condition. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the NMC. February 1-4 (pp.169-175) Verona Italy
37. Mijić P Knežević I. Domaćinović M Ivanković A. Ivkić Z. (2005). Relationship between various phases of milk flow at mechanical milking system and the somatic cell count in cows’milk J Anim Feed Sci 14 483-490. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/67041/2005