Influence of Metabolic Cage on Wistar Rat Physiological State

Open access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of metabolic cage housing on the Wistar rat physiological state and to analyze the correlation between the minerals in blood and urine. Thirty male rats were used in the experiment. Fifteen rats (control group) were housed individually in standard polycarbonate cages and fifteen rats (experimental group) in metabolic cages (Techniplast, Italy) for two weeks. Body weight, respiration rate, water and food consumptions were recorded for each animal at the beginning of the experiment. The same parameters, as well as blood and urine parameters of control and experimental animals were recorded during the experiment after 72 h, 168 h and 336 h of housing in standard cages and metabolic cages. Urine collection was measured only in the experimental group. Rats weight decreased from 3.84 % to 18.59 % (P<0.05), respiration rate from 18.65 % to 24.59 % (P<0.05) when rats were housed in metabolic cages. Consumption of food and water by the rat depended on how long the animal was kept in metabolic cage. Glucose concentration increased on average by 15.37 %, WBC count decreased by 5.83 % in the blood of rats housed in metabolic cages compared to the animals housed in standard cages. We did not observe significant changes of triglycerides concentration, red blood cells count and total protein between all rats. The positive moderate correlation of rat housing in a metabolic cage was between K blood and K urine, P blood and P urine, Na blood and K blood, between Na urine and P urine and significant negative moderate correlation was determined between K urine and P urine. These present study findings indicate that metabolism cage housing significantly affects rat’s physiological parameters and potentially may influence animal health and wellbeing.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Gordon C.J. Fogelson L. (1994). Metabolic and thermoregulatory responses of the rat maintained in acrylic or wire-screen cages: implications for pharmacological studies. Physiology & Behavior 56(1): 73–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(94)90263-1

  • 2. Kurien B.T. Everds N.E. Scofield R.H. (2004). Experimental animal urine collection: a review Laboratory Animals Ltd. Laboratory Animals 38 333–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/0023677041958945 PMid:15479549

  • 3. EU (2010) Directive 2010/63 EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European Communities L276 pp. 33–79.

  • 4. Eriksson E. Royo F.K Lyberg Carlsson H-E. Hau J. (2004). Effect of metabolic cage housing on immunoglobulin A and corticosterone excretion in faeces and urine of young male rats. Experimental Physiology 89(4): 427–433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.2004.027656 PMid:15131075

  • 5. Heidbreder C.A. Weiss I.C. Domeney A.M. Pryce C. Homberg J. Hedou G. Feldon J. Moran M.C. Nelson P. (2000). Behavioral neurochemical and endocrinological characterization of the early social isolation syndrome. Neuroscience 100(4): 749–768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00336-5

  • 6. Krohn T.C. Hansen A.K. Dragsted N. (2003). Telemetry as a method for measuring the impact of housing conditions on rat’s welfare. Animal Welfare 12(1): 53–62.

  • 7. Manser C.E. Morris T.H. Broom D.M. (1995). An investigation into the effects of solid or grid cage flooring on the welfare of laboratory rats. Laboratory Animals 29(4): 353–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/002367795780740023 PMid:8558816

  • 8. Cvek-Hopkins K. (2007). Effect of metabolic cage housing on rodent welfare. SLU Uppsala 7–9.

  • 9. Yamada K. Ohki-Hamazaki H. Wada K. (2000). Differential effects of social isolation upon body weight food consumption and responsiveness to novel and social environment in bombesin receptor subtype-3 (BRS-3) deficient mice. Physiology & Behavior 68 555–561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(99)00214-0

  • 10. Balcombe J.P. Barnard N.D Sandusky C. (2004). Laboratory routines cause animal stress. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 43 42–51. PMid:15669134

  • 11. Sjaastad Ø.V. Hove K. Sand O. (2003). Physiology of Domestic Animals (pp. 141 224 226–227 241). First edition. Oslo: Scandinavian Veterinary Press.

  • 12. Qiang D. Salva A. Sottas C.M. Niu E. Holmes M. Hardy M.P. (2004). Rapid glucocorticoid mediation of suppressed testosterone biosynthesis in male mice subjected to immobilization stress. Journal of Andrology 25(6): 973–981.

  • 13. Hunt C. Hambly C. (2006). Faecal corticosterone concentrations indicate that separately housed male mice are not more stressed than group housed males. Physiology & Behavior 87 519–526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.11.013 PMid:16442135

  • 14. Nagy T.R. Krzywanski D. Li J. Meleth S. Desmond R. (2002). Effect of group vs. single housing on phenotypic variance in C57BL/6J mice. Obesity Research 10 412–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/oby.2002.57 PMid:12006642

  • 15. Spangenberg E.M.F. Augustsson H. Dahlborn K. Essén-Gustavsson B. Cvek K. (2005). Housing related activity in rats: effects on body weight urinary corticosterone levels muscle properties and performance. Laboratory Animals 39 45–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/0023677052886457 PMid:15703124

  • 16. D’Arbe M. Einstein R. Lavidis N.A. (2002). Stressful animal housing conditions and their potential effect on sympathetic neurotransmission in mice. The American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory Intergrative and Comparative Physiology 282 1422–1428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00805.2000 PMid:11959685

  • 17. Gil M.C. Aguirre J.A. Lemoine A.P. Segura E.T. Barontini M.I. (1999). Influence of age on stress responses to metabolic cage housing in rats. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiologi 19(5): 625–633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006984402291 PMid:10384260

  • 18. Ollson I.A.S. Westlund K. (2007). The effect of social factors on behavior and welfare of laboratory rodents and non-human primates. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 103 229–254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.022

  • 19. Freymann J. Tsai P.P. Stelzer H. Hackbarth H. (2015). The amount of cage bedding preferred by female BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice. Lab animal Europe 15 (2): 13–19.

  • 20. Hirsjärvi P. Väliaho T. (1995). Gentled and nonhandled Wistar rats in a mildly novel open-field situation. Scandinavian Journal of Laboratory Animal Science 22 (3): 265–269.

  • 21. Van Loo P.L.P. Kruitwagen C.L.J.J. Van Zutphen L.F.M. Koolhaas J.M. Baumans V. (2000). Modulation of aggression in male mice: influence of cage cleaning regime and scent marks. Anim Welf. 9 281–295.

  • 22. Armario A. Montero J.L. Balasch J. (1986). Sensitivity of corticosterone and some metabolic variables to graded levels of low intensity stresses in adult male rats. Physiol Behav. 37 559–561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(86)90285-4

  • 23. Castelhano-Carlos M.J. Baumans V. (2009). The impact of light noise cage cleaning and in-house transport on welfare and stress of laboratory rats. Laboratory Animals 43 311–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/la.2009.0080098 PMid:19505937

  • 24. De Boer S.F. Koopmans S.J. Slangen J.L. Van der Gugten J. (1990). Plasma catecholamine corticosterone and glucose responses to repeated stress in rats. Effect of interstressor interval length. Physiol Behav 47 1117–1124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(90)90361-7

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.45

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.193
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.328

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 327 130 0
PDF Downloads 142 66 0