The Development of Nanotechnologies and Advanced Materials Industry in Science and Entrepreneurship: Legal Indicators. A Case Study of Latvia (Part Four)

Open access


The present scientific paper is the fourth part and continuation of the in-depth scientific study of the developed system of engineering economic indicators, where the authors obtain results from the scientific research presented in a series of works on the development of the nanotechnologies and advanced materials industry in science and entrepreneurship in Latvia. Part Four determines the essential legal indicators of the development of nano-field at the macro, micro, and meso development levels of the economic environment in Latvia. The paper provides the interaction of new identified indicators of nano-field in terms of further scientific and practical activities. Latvia is analysed in comparison with other countries in the world.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. A World Bank Group Flagship Report. (2017). Doing Business 2017. Equal Opportunity for All. Comparing Business Regulation for Domestic Firms in 190 Economies. The World Bank Group. 14th edition. Available at

  • 2. Schwab K. (2016). The Global Competitiveness Report 2016–2017. World Economic Forum. Available at

  • 3. Worthington I. & Britton C. (2006). The Business Environment (5th ed.). Leicester United Kingdom: Prentice Hall.

  • 4. Acemoglu D. & Robinson J. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Prosperity and Poverty. Crown Business.

  • 5. Economy Rankings. (2017). Doing Business. The World Bank Group. Available at

  • 6. Levade A. (2013). “La sécurité juridique. Propos introductifsLa sécurité juridique. Supplément La Semaine juridique 1 July 2013 p. 8.

  • 7. Sauvé J.-M. (2014). Opening speech the conference Entreprise et sécurité juridique. French Council of State. 21 November 2014. Available at

  • 8. Deffains B. & Kessedjian C. (2015). Index of Legal Certainty: Report for the Civil Law Initiative (Fondation pour le droit continental). Université Paris 2 Panthéon-Assas; Centre de Recherches en Economie et Droit; Fondation pour le droit continental - Civil Law Initiative. Available at

  • 9. Värk J. (2017). Legal certainty held in esteem. Postimees. Available at

  • 10. Rule of Law Index. (2016). World Justice Project. Available at

  • 11. The World Bank. (2017). Regulatory quality – country rankings. Available at

  • 12. European Patent Office. (2017). How to get a European patent Guide for applicants? Available at

  • 13. PCT FAQs. WIPO. (2017). Available at

  • 14. Patent Office of the Republic of Latvia. (2017). Advantages of foreign patenting using the PCT procedure. Available at

  • 15. State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania. (2017). Available at

  • 16. Estonian Patent Office. (2017). Available at

  • 17. Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO). (2017). Как получить евразийский патент. Available at

  • 18. Patent Office of the Republic of Latvia. (2017). Presentation materials “Dynamics of Trademark Registration in Latvia”.

  • 19. European Patent Office. (2017). National applications. Available at

  • 20. Patent Office of the Republic of Latvia. (2017). State fees for the legal protection of inventions. Available at

  • 21. Patent Office of the Republic of Latvia. (2017). International patent procedures and costs. Available at

  • 22. CENELEC. (2017). Standards and your business. Available at

  • 23. European Commission. (2017). What is an SME? Available at

  • 24. CENELEC. (2017). Courses. Available at

  • 25. European Standards Organisations. (2017). Strategic objectives for the European standardization system to 2020. Available at

  • 26. World Economic Forum. (2016). Latvia in the Global Competitiveness Report 2014–2015. Available at

  • 27. European Commission. (2017). Country Report Latvia 2017. Available at

  • 28. Sauka A. & Putniņš T. (2016). Shadow Economy Index for the Baltic countries 2009 – 2015. SSE Riga and SEB. Riga: Stockholm School of Economics in Riga. Available at

  • 29. Litvins G. (2014). Long-term litigation – Myth or reality. Jurista Vārds 06.05.2014 No. 18 (820) 2. lpp.

  • 30. Laws of the Republic of Latvia. (2017). Cabinet of Ministers Order No. 169. Available at

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.32

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.147
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.325

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 181 80 5
PDF Downloads 141 58 2