The Development of Nanotechnologies and Advanced Materials Industry in Science and Entrepreneurship: Socioeconomic and Technical Indicators. A Case Study of Latvia (Part One)

Open access


The present scientific paper is the first part of two publications, where the authors obtain results from the scientific research presented in a series of works on the development of the nanotechnologies and advanced materials industry in science and entrepreneurship in Latvia. The study has a focus on finding proper socioeconomic and technical indicators. It provides resume on a scope of the study. The paper contains the developed structure of engineering economic indicator system, determined groups of indicators for assessment of the development of nanotechnologies and advanced materials industry in Latvia and results of the evaluation of the obtained statistics on the economic indicators.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Geipele I. Staube T. Ciemleja G. Zeltins N. & Ekmanis J. (2015). Identity of innovative multifunctional material manufacturing business in Latvia. Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences52 (4) 3–18. doi: 10.1515/lpts-2015-0019

  • 2. Gholizadeh H. Naeini A. B. & Moini A. (2015). A quantitative model of technological catch-up. International Journal of Engineering & Technology4 (1) 233–243. doi: 10.14419/ijet.v4i1.4203

  • 3. Dessi C. & Floris M. (2010). When management and customers see eye-to-eye: the agreement factor and performance. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 17 (1) 102–122. doi: 10.1108/14626001011019152

  • 4. Niessen S. & Friedrich R. (2009). Das Meistern der Krise für kleine und mittlere Unternehmen (KMUs): Erfolgsfaktoren und ihre Wirkung. OnlineBlatt 01/2009. Retrieved from

  • 5. Becerra M. (2009). Theory of the firm for strategic management economic value analysis Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511626524

  • 6. Parmenter D. (2007). Key performance indicators: Developing implementing and using winning KPIs. 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

  • 7. Cokins G. (2004). Performance management: Finding the missing pieces (to close the intelligence gap). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

  • 8. Neely A. (Ed.). (2002). Business performance measurement: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • 9. Epstein M. & Manzoni J. (Eds.). (2006). Performance measurement and management control improving organizations and society. Bingley: Elsevier JAI.

  • 10. Franceschini F. Galetto M. & Maisano D. (2007). Management by measurement: Designing key indicators and performance measurement systems. Torino: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-73212-9

  • 11. Geipele I. Staube T. Ciemleja G. Geipele S. Zeltins N. & Ekmanis J. (2015). The development and design of engineering economic indicator system for nanotechnology industry product manufacturing: A case study of Latvia. Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences 52 (5) 3–19. doi: 10.1515/lpts-2015-0024.

  • 12. The Global Innovation Index. (2015). 2015 country ranking. Retrieved 19 October 2015 from

  • 13. World Economic Forum. (2014). Competitiveness rankings. . Retrieved 19 October 2015 from

  • 14. World Economic Forum. (2014). Latvia in the global competitiveness report 2014–2015. Retrieved 19 October 2015 from

  • 15. Trading economics. (n.d.). Latvia Credit Rating. . Retrieved 11 October 2015 from

  • 16. Eurostat. (n.d.). Real GDP growth rate – Volume. Retrieved 8 October 2015 from

  • 17. Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. (n.d.). Latvia’s foreign trade. Main commodities and partners in 2014. Retrieved 8 January 2016 from (in Latvian).

  • 18. National Development Plan of Latvia’s Portal (2015). The prime minister will report on achieving the national development objectives and implementation of the NAP2020. Retrieved 5 January 2016 from: (in Latvian).

  • 19. Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. (n.d.). Expenditure on research activities by sector and their financing (mln. EUR) Retrieved 5 January 2016 from (in Latvian).

  • 20. Eurostat statistics explained. (n.d.). Europe 2020 indicators – Research and development. Retrieved 15 November 2015 from

  • 21. LR Legislation. (2015). Law on Corporate Income Tax. Retrieved 9 January 2016 from (in Latvian).

  • 22. Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. (n.d.). Informative survey “Innovation in Latvia for 2010–2012”.. Retrieved 15 November 2015 from (in Latvian).

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.32

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.147
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.325

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 189 62 3
PDF Downloads 86 34 0