Effects of Using Channelling Devices to Increase Efficiency of Hydrokinetic Devices

Open access


In the rivers of Latvia and of many other countries the flow velocity in the places that are most suitable for installation of hydrokinetic devices is 0.4 to 0.9 m/s. In a stream or a river the hydrokinetic devices can reach full efficiency starting from about twice higher flow velocities. It is advisable to at least double this velocity thus increasing the efficiency and power output of the hydrokinetic devices installed in such places. Since Latvia has abundance of slow rivers and almost none are fast, research in this field is of high importance. Diversified technical methods are known that allow increasing substantially the efficiency of hydrokinetic devices. These methods include the use of diffusers, concentrators, different types of other channelling devices and means of flow control. Desirable effects are achieved through changing the cross-section and/or direction of a flow, its pressure, minimizing the turbulence, etc. This work substantiates the use of such devices for increasing the efficiency of hydrokinetic devices. A method is proposed for evaluation of the effects on power output gained owing to the use of channelling devices. Results show that the efficiency of hydrokinetic devices can be increased by at least 110%.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Khan M.J. Bhuyan G. Iqbal M.T. & Quaicoe J.E. (2009). Hydrokinetic energy conversion systems and assessment of horizontal and vertical axis turbines for river and tidal applications: A technology status review. Applied Energy 86 (10) 1823-1835.

  • 2. Lago L.I. Ponta F.L. & Chen L. (Dec. 2010). Advances and trends in hydrokinetic turbine systems. Energy for Sustainable Development 14(4) 287-296.

  • 3. Sųrnes K.; Small-scale Water Current Turbines for River Applications; January 2010; ZERO - Zero Emission Resource Organisation; www.zero.no

  • 4. Khan M.J. Iqbal M.T. & Quaicoe J.E. (2008). River current energy conversion systems: Progress prospects and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 12(8) 2177-2193.

  • 5. Rudovic A. (1996). Latvijas fiziskā ģeogrāfija. Zvaigzne ABC; 1996.

  • 6. Mukrimin S.G. (2011). Evaluation and measures to increase performance coefficient of hydrokinetic turbines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 3669-3675.

  • 7. Wang Sh. Xu Ch. Yuan P. & Wang Y.; (2011) Hydrodynamic optimization of channelling device for hydro turbine based on lattice Boltzmann method. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 61 3722-3729.

  • 8. Malipeddi A.R. & Chatterjee D. (2012); Influence of duct geometry on the performance of Darrieus hydroturbine. Renewable Energy 43 292-300.

  • 9. Shiomi N. Setoguchi T. Kinoue Y. Kaneko K. & Ohya Y. (2003). Development of Two-Way Diffuser for Tidal Energy Conversion System. Proceedings of the 13th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Honolulu (Hawaii USA) May 25-30.

  • 10. Gaden D.L.F. & Bibeau E.L. (2010). A numerical investigation into the effect of diffusers on the performance of hydrokinetic turbines using a validated momentum source turbine model. Renewable Energy 35 1152-1158.

  • 11. Setoguchi T. Shiomo N. & Kaneko K. (2004); Development of two-way diffuser for fluid energy conversion system. Renewable Energy 29 1757-1771 (technical note).

  • 12. Ponta F. & Jacovkis P. (2008). Marine-current power generation by diffuser-augmented floating hydro-turbines. Renewable Energy 33 665-673.

  • 13. Lawn CJ. (2003). Optimization of the power output from ducted turbines. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part A (Journal of Power and Energy 217 107-117).

  • 14. Phillips D.G. Nash T.A. & Oakey A. Flay R.G.J. & Richards P.J. (1999). Computational fluid dynamic and wind tunnel modelling of a diffuser augmented wind turbine.Wind Engineering 23 17-13.

  • 15. Betz A. (1926). Wind-Energie und ihre Ausnutzung durch Windmuehlen. GoØttingen: Bandenhoeck & Ruprect.

  • 16. Jamieson P. (2008). Generalized limits for energy extraction in a linear constant velocity flow field. Wind Energy 11 445-457.

  • 17. Kalnacs J. Kalnacs A. Mutule A. & Pērsis U. (2013). Potential of the lower Daugava for siting hydrokinetic turbines. Latv. J. Phys. Tech. Sci. 50 3-14.

  • 18. Kalnacs A. Kalnacs J. Mutule A. & Pērsis U. (2008). Methods for estimation of the riverflow potential for hydrokinetic power generation. Latv. J. Phys. Tech. Sci.51 26-36.

  • 19. State Limited Liability Company “Latvian Environment Geology and Meteorology Centre”: Link to the internet

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.32

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.147
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.325

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 167 71 3
PDF Downloads 88 49 0