Nanotechnologies in Latvia: Commercialisation Aspect

Open access


The authors consider the possibilities to apply the nanotechnology products of manufacturing industries in Latvia for further commercialisation. The purpose of the research is to find out the preliminary criteria for the system of engineering economic indicators for multifunctional nanocoating technologies. The article provides new findings and calculations for the local nanotechnology market research characterising the development of nanotechnology industry. The authors outline a scope of issues as to low activities rankings in Latvia on application of locally produced nanotechnologies towards efficiency of the resource use for nanocoating technologies. For the first time in Latvia, the authors make the case study research and summarise the latest performance indicators of the Latvian companies operating in the nanotechnology industry.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Coleman K. G. (2002). Commercial evolution of nanotechnology. Nanotechnology IEEE-NANO2002; Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Conference 385-388. DOI: 10.1109/NANO.2002.1032271.

  • 2. Staube T. Ciemleja G. & Geipele I. (2014). (a) Nanoscience: the scale of Latvia. Advanced Materials Research 1004 28-31. DOI: 10.4028/

  • 3. Nalwa H. S. (2000). Handbook of Nanostructured Materials and Nanotechnology (5th ed-n) Academic Press (USA).

  • 4. Council of the European Union (2012). Competitiveness (Internal Market Industry Research and Space). Retrieved from

  • 5. Drexler E. & Pamlin D. (2013). Nano-solutions for the 21st century. Retrieved from

  • 6. Staube T. Ciemlejа G. & Geipele I. (2014). (b) The origins of nanotechnology in Latvia. Advanced Materials Research 1025 1083-1087. DOI: 10.4028/

  • 7. Urbahs A. Bogdanova S. Urbaha M. Savkovs K. & Rijkuris G. (2013). Investigation of the heat resistance of protective decorative ion-plasma coatings. Journal of Engineering and Technology (1) 267-270.

  • 8. Urbahs A. Banovs M. Nasibullins A. & Carjova K. (2013). Analysis of the mechanism of destruction of aircraft components. Journal of Engineering and Technology (1) 167-172.

  • 9. Savkovs K. (2014). Development of Metal-Ceramic Nanostructured Coatings for the Hot Section Parts of a Gas Turbine Engine. Retrieved from

  • 10. DPA Title III program. (n.d.). Retrieved from

  • 11. Dai L. (2006). Carbon Nanotechnology - Recent Developments in Chemistry Physics Materials Science and Device Applications. Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier.

  • 12. Makhlouf A. S. H. & Tiginyanu I. (2011). Nanocoatings and Ultra-Thin Films – Technologies and Applications. Woodhead Publishing (UK).

  • 13. Kozlov V. Yadin E. Taiminsh G. & Fomin V. (2007). New vacuum equipment for multilayer coating deposition on large area glass. Retrieved from

  • 14. Urbahs A. Rijkuris G. & Stelpa I. (2013). Marine vessel structure and equipment corrosion defect characteristics. Transport and Engineering 35 38-45.

  • 15. Springis G. Rudzitis J. Leitans A. & Avisane A. (2013). Wear calculation model for sliding surfaces with nano-coatings. Production and Engineering 35 74-78.

  • 16. NordicBaltSat Project (Overview (n.d.)). Retrieved from

  • 17. Ventspils High Technology Park (2012). Strategy of Space Technology and Services Cluster 2012-2015. Retrieved from (in Latvian).

  • 18. Soldatenko A. (2011). An Overview of Activities Related to Nanotechnologies in Central and Eastern Europe. Retrieved from

  • 19. Sargent J. F. Jr. (2013). The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Overview Reauthorization and Appropriations Issues. Retrieved from

  • 20. Lo C. C. Wang C. H. Chien P. Y. & Hung C. W. (2012). An empirical study of commercialization performance on nanoproducts. Technovation 32 (3-4) 168-178. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2011.08.005.

  • 21. Prahalad C. K. & Hamel G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Boston (MA) 235-256.

  • 22. Bozeman B. Larédo P. & Mangematin V. (2007). Understanding the emergence and deployment of “nano” S&T. Research Policy 36 (6) 807-812. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.010.

  • 23. Глазьев С. Ю. Дементьев В. Е. Елкин С. В. Крянев А. В. Ростовский Н. С. Фирстов Ю. Л. & Харитонов В. В. (2009). Нанотехнологии как ключевой фактор нового технологического уклада в экономике. М.: Тровант.

  • 24. Credit Suisse (2010). Guide to the Credit Suisse Global Nanotechnology Index Version 1.4. Retrieved from

  • 25. Mogoutov A. & Kahane B. (2007). Data search strategy for science and technology emergence: a scalable and evolutionary query for nanotechnology tracking. Research Policy 36 (6) 893-903. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.005.

  • 26. Avenel E. Favier A. V. Ma S. Mangematin V. & Rieu C. (2007). Diversification and hybridization in firm knowledge bases in nanotechnologies. Research Policy 36 (6) 864-870. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.002.

  • 27. Bhat J. S. A. (2005). Concerns of new technology based industries – the case of nanotechnology. Technovation 25 (5) 457-462. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.09.001.

  • 28. LETA (2014). Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Latvia will ask the government authorities for 1.35 million euros to promote collaboration with the European Space Agency. Retrieved from (in Latvian).

  • 29. Miller J. C. Serrato R. Represas-Cardenas J. M. & Kundahl G. (2005). The handbook of nanotechnology: Business policy and intellectual property law. John Wiley & Sons (Canada).

  • 30. Tsuzuki T. (2013). Nanotechnology Commercialisation. Singapore: Pan Stanford DOI: 10.4032/9789814303293

  • 31. Christensen C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

  • 32. Kostoff R.N. Boylan R. & Simons G.R. (2004). Disruptive technology roadmaps. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 71 (1-2) 141-159. DOI: 10.1016/S0040-1625(03)00048-9.

  • 33. Oakey R. P. (2003). Technical entrepreneurship in high technology small firms: some observations on the implications for management. Technovation 23 (8) 679-688. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00045-2

  • 34. Knol W. H. C. (2004). Nanotechnology and business opportunities: scenarios as awareness instrument. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference ‘High Technology Small Firms’ Enscheda the Netherlands May 24 - 25 609-621.

  • 35. Muiznieks I. & Putans R. (2011). Scientific Research Today–Challenges and Solutions for Latvia. Does It Provide Answers to Current Challenges in Higher Education and Research? In: Interdisciplinarity in Social Sciences: Does It Provide Answers to Current Challenges in Higher Education and Research? Muravska T. Ozolina Z. (Eds.). Riga: University of Latvia Press 112 – 130.

  • 36. Council of the European Union (2011). Environment. Retrieved from

  • 37. Michna J. Ekmanis J. Zeltins N. Zebergs V. & Siemianowicz J. (2011). Management of energy and environment conservation: current methodical problems. Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences 48 (1) 28-41 DOI: 10.2478/v10047-011-0003-z.

  • 38. Köhler C. C. (2009). The valuation of nanotechnology firms: a Brunswikian approach. Retrieved from

  • 39. Nanalyze (2014). What Happened to the Merrill Lynch Nanotech Index? Retrieved from

  • 40. European Commission. EUROSTAT database. Retrieved from

  • 41. The Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Latvia. (2013). Final report of the research on the private sector’s investments into the research and development. Retrieved from (in Latvian).

  • 42. Understanding Financial Ratios (n.d.). Retrieved from

  • 43. Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia database and site information. Retrieved from

  • 44. Lursoft database of enterprises (2014). Retrieved from

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.32

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.147
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.325

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 253 131 3
PDF Downloads 67 46 2