Energy from Biomass for Conversion of Biomass

J. Abolins 1  and J. Gravitis 2
  • 1 Institute of Atomic Physics and Spectroscopy, University of Latvia Riga, LV-1586, LATVIA
  • 2 Latvian State Institute of Wood Chemistry, Dzerbenes Str. 27, Riga, LV-1006, LATVIA

Energy from Biomass for Conversion of Biomass

Along with estimates of minimum energy required by steam explosion pre-treatment of biomass some general problems concerning biomass conversion into chemicals, materials, and fuels are discussed. The energy necessary for processing biomass by steam explosion auto-hydrolysis is compared with the heat content of wood and calculated in terms of the amount of saturated steam consumed per unit mass of the dry content of wood biomass. The fraction of processed biomass available for conversion after steam explosion pre-treatment is presented as function of the amount of steam consumed per unit mass of the dry content of wood.

The estimates based on a simple model of energy flows show the energy required by steam explosion pre-treatment of biomass being within 10% of the heat content of biomass - a realistic amount demonstrating that energy for the process can be supplied from a reasonable proportion of biomass used as the source of energy for steam explosion pre-treatment.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Gravitis, J. (2006). Green Biobased Chemistry Platform for Sustainability. In: Environmental Education, Communication and Sustainability, 23: Sustainable Development in the Baltic and Beyond, Peter Lang Publishers House, Frankfurt am Maim, Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Wien, 145-160.

  • Gravitis, J. (2007). Zero techniques and systems - ZETS strength and weakness, J. Cleaner Production, 15, 1190-1197.

  • Gravitis, J. (2008). Biorefinery: Biomaterials and Bioenergy from Photosynthesis, Within Zero Emissions Framework. In: Sustainable Energy Production and Consumption. Benifits, Strategies and Environmental Costing. NATO Science for Peace and Security, Barbir F., Ulgiati S., (Eds.), Springer, 327-337.

  • Kamm, B., & Kamm, M. (2004). Principles of biorefineries, Applied Microbiol. & Biotech., 64, 137-145.

  • Abolins, J., & Gravitis, J. (2007). Biomass conversion to transportation fuels, combustibles, and nano-materials by steam explosion, Latvian J. Phys. Techn. Sci., 4, 29-39.

  • Gravitis, J. (1987). Theoretical and applied aspects of the steam explosion plant biomass autohydrolysis method, Khimiya Drevesiny (Wood Chemistry), 5, 3-21 (In Russian).

  • Heitz, M., Capek-Ménard, E., Koeberle, P.G., Gagné, J., Chornet, E., Overend, R.P., Taylor, J.D., & Yu, E. (1991). Fractionation of Populus tremuloides at the pilot plant scale: Optimization of steam pretreatment conditions using the STAKE II technology, Biores. Tecnol., 35, 23-32.

  • Wark, K., Jr. (1988). Thermodynamics New York: McGraw-Hill, 854.

  • Borovikov, A., & Ugolev, B. (1989). Handbook of Wood (in Russian): Lesnaya Promishlennost, 144.

  • Rowell, R., edit. (1984). The Chemistry of Solid Wood Adv. in Chem. Ser. 207, Washington DC: Amer. Chem. Soc., 153.

  • Smil, V. (1999). Energies, Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 210.

  • Smil, V. (2003). The Earth's Biosphere, Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 286.

  • Carere, C.R., Sparling, R., Cicek, N., & Levin, D.B. (2008). Third Generation Biofuels via Direct Cellulose Fermentation, Intern. J. Mol. Sci., 9, 1342-1360.

  • Huber, G.W., and Bruce, E., & Dale, B.E. (2009). Grassoline at the Pump. Scientific American. July. 40-47.

  • Ulgiati, S., & Sciubba, E. (2003). Thermodynamic and Environmental Assessment of Bioethanol Production from Corn, Advances in Energy Studies - 3rd Biennal International Workshop, Porto Venere, 629-647.



Journal + Issues