Exploring the Connections between Land Use and Transportation: A Case Study of Shaheb Bazar to Rail Gate Road, Rajshahi City

Open access

Abstract

Land use-transportation comprehensive planning has become an increasingly common technique in regional and sub-regional planning processes. Since land use management strategies act as an effective tool to achieve transportation planning objectives, it is important to identify the relationship between land use pattern and travel behaviour. This study examined the relationship between transportation and land use in Rajshahi city. Rajshahi is a major urban, commercial and educational centre of Bangladesh. In Rajshahi, Shaheb bazaar zero points to New Market road is one of the most important roads. After construction of this road in 2013 intense development has taken place beside it. To identify this primary relationship data has been collected from different types of field survey. Then the impact of land use and transportation has been determined by comparing with the previous database. The findings of the study show that there exist a reciprocal relationship between land use and transportation system and the impacts on both. The study also notes that the impact of transportation on land use is more than the impact of land use on transportation. The study will help to control the haphazard growth and traffic congestion of the concerned area in the future.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Waddell P. et al. (2007). Incorporating land use in metropolitan transportation planning. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 41(5) 382-410.

  • [2] R.D.A. (2004). Rajshahi Metropolitan Development Plan. 2004-2024 Volume-II Detailed Area Plan. 2004 Ministry of Housing and Public Works Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.

  • [3] Dargay J.M. & M. Hanly. (2003). The impact of land use patterns on travel behaviour. in European Transport Conference Strasbourg France.

  • [4] Kockelman M.K. (1997). Travel behaviour as function of accessibility land use mixing and land use balance: evidence from San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation research record. 1997. 1607(1) 116-125.

  • [5] Rahman M.M. (2010). Factors of economic transformation in sub-urban areas of Rajshahi City Bangladesh. Journal of Life and Earth Science. 5 47-55.

  • [6] Rahman R. Shakil S.H. & Quader K.B.A. (2011). Impact on different type of land uses on transportation system of Dhaka city: A case study of Mirpur road and its adjacent land uses. Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology.

  • [7] Beilin R. et al. (2014). Analysing how drivers of agricultural land abandonment affect biodiversity and cultural landscapes using case studies from Scandinavia Iberia and Oceania. Land use policy. 36 60-72.

  • [8] Helming K. et al. (2008). Ex ante impact assessment of land use changes in European regions—The SENSOR approach in Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes. Springer. 77-105.

  • [9] Litman T. & Steele R. (2012). Land use impacts on transport: How land use factors affect travel behavior. Victoria Transport Policy Institute Victoria BC. Canada.

  • [10] Cavalli-Sforza V. & Ortolano L. (1984). Delphi forecasts of land use: Transportation interactions. Journal of Transportation Engineering. 110(3) 324-339.

  • [11] Pérez-Soba M. et al. (2008). Land use functions—a multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability. Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer. 375-404.

  • [12] Huang H. (1996). The land-use impacts of urban rail transit systems. Journal of Planning Literature 11(1) 17-30.

  • [13] Vessali K.V. (1996). Land use impacts of rapid transit: A review of the empirical literature. Berkeley Planning Journal. 11(1).

  • [14] Hansen W.G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of planners. 25(2) 73-76.

  • [15] Knight R.L. & Trygg L.L. (1977). Evidence of land use impacts of rapid transit systems. Transportation. 6(3) 231-247.

  • [16] Zhang M. (2004). The role of land use in travel mode choice: Evidence from Boston and Hong Kong. Journal of the American planning association. 70(3) 344-360.

  • [17] Kitamura R. Mokhtarian P.L. & Laidet L. (1997). A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation. 24(2) 125-158.

  • [18] Handy S.L. (1996). Understanding the link between urban form and nonwork travel behavior. Journal of planning education and research. 15(3) 183-198.

  • [19] Manski C.F. (1977). The structure of random utility models. Theory and decision. 8(3) 229-254.

  • [20] Hat Bazaar Survey 2001-2002 & Field Survey 2016.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 117 117 6
PDF Downloads 78 78 8