Effectiveness of Collaborative Strategic Reading and Whole Language Approach on Reading Comprehension Performance of Children with Learning Disabilities in Oyo State Nigeria Adetoun

Open access


This study was carried out to determine the effectiveness of collaborative strategic reading and whole language approach on reading comprehension performance of primary school children with learning disabilities in Oyo state Nigeria. Seventy eight pupils participated in the study; they were between ages nine and eleven. Five hypotheses were generated and tested at 0.05 level of significance, convenience sampling technique was used to sample participants. The study was carried out in ten weeks. A pre test post test control group quasi experimental design with a 3 x 2 factorial matrix was adopted for the study. Analysis of covariance and t-test statistics were used to analyse the data collected. The five null hypotheses were rejected because there was significant difference in treatment effect across treatment groups and gender. It is hereby recommended that collaborative strategic reading should be employed to teach reading comprehension in Nigerian primary schools.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Acosta R. L. (2012). An exploration of reading methods in 1st grade: comparing the basal approach and balance literacy. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Louisiana State University

  • Allington R.L. & McGill-Franzen A (1989). Schools responses to reading failure. Instruction for chapter 1 and special education students in grade two four and eight. The Elementary School Journal 89 (5) 529-542.

  • Alloway N. & Gillbert P. (1997a). Boys and literacy. Lessons from Australia. Gender and Education 9 (1) 49-60.

  • Alqarni F. (2015). Collaborative strategic reading to enhance leaner reading comprehension in English as a foreign language. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary studies 4 (1) 161-166.

  • Barberio I. L. (2005). The effectiveness of collaborative strategic reading among 3rd grade students. Unpublished Master Thesis Rowan University

  • Bateman B. (1991). Teaching word recognition to slow learning children. Journal of reading writing and learning disabilities international 7(1) 1-16.

  • Beck I. L. & McKeown M. G. (1998). Comprehension The Sinequanon of reading In Patton S. and Holmes M. (ed) The keys to literacy. (pp 40-52) Washington DC. Council for Basic Education

  • Bergeron B. S. (1990). What does the term whole language mean? Constructing a definition from the literature. Journal of reading Behaviour 22(4) 301-329.

  • Berkeley S. (2007). Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities in Scruggs T and Mastropieri M.A (eds). International Perspectives- Advance in learning and Behavioural Disabilities. Vol. 20. UK: Emerald group publishing Limited.

  • Blachman B. (1991). Early intervention for children reading problem: Clinical applications of the research in the phonological awareness. Topics in language disorders 12(1) 51-65.

  • Bostas G. & Padeliadu S. (2003). Goal orientation and reading comprehension strategy use among students with and without reading difficulties. Journal of Educational Research 39(4) 477-495.

  • Bremer C. D. Vaughn S. Clapper A. & Ae-Hwakim (2002). Collaborative Strategies Reading (CSR): Improving Secondary Students reading comprehension skills. Improving Secondary Education and Transition Services through Research 1(2) 1-8.

  • Browder D. M. Spooner F. & Meyer C. (2011). Comprehension across the curriculum. In Browder D. M. & Spooner F. (Eds). Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities. The Guilford Press New York

  • Bryce N. (2011). Meeting the reading challenges of science textbooks in the primary grades. The reading teacher 64(7) 474-485.

  • Carlisie J. F. (1993). Understading passages in science textbooks: a comparison of students with and without learning disabilities. In Leu D.J & Kinzer C.K (Eds.) Examining central issues in literacy research theory and practice. Forty second year book of the National Reading Conference Chicago The National Reading Conference

  • Chall J. S. & Jacobs V. A. (2003). Poor children’s fourth grade slump. American Educator 27(1) 14-15.

  • Crowe D. A. (2007). Reading comprehension instruction in the middle grade for students with learning and behavioural problems. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation University of Alabama

  • Day J. D. & Zajakowski A. (1991). Comparisons of learning ease and transfer propensity in poor and average readers. Journals of Learning Disabilities 24(7) 41-426.

  • Denton C. A. & Vaughn S. C. (2008). Reading and writing intervention for older students with disabilities: possibilities and Challenges. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 23(2) 61-62.

  • Dewitz P. Leahy S. B. Jones J. & Sullivan P. M. (2010). The essentials guide to selecting and using core reading programs. Newarh DE: international reading Association

  • Durkin D. (1978-1979). What classroom observation review about reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly 14(3) 481-533.

  • Fitzgerald J. (2002). Narrative text. In Guzetti B. (Ed) Literacy in America: An Encyclopedia. New York. ABC

  • Fromkin V. Rodman R. & Nuams N. (2010). An introduction to language (9th ed) USA Cengage Learning

  • Gajria M. & Salvia J. (1992). The effects of summarization instruction on text comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children. 58(6) 508-516.

  • Gajria M. Jitendra A. K. Sood S. & Sacks G. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD. A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities 40(3) 210-226.

  • Gelzheiser L M. & Myers J. (1991). Reading instruction by classroom remedial and resource room teachers. The Journal of Special Education 24(4) 512-526.

  • Grabe W. (1991). Current development in second language reading research TESOL Quarterly 25(3) 375-406.

  • Graesser A. Leon J. A. & Otero J. (2002). The psychology of science text comprehension. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

  • Graham L. & Bellert A. (2005). Reading comprehension difficulties experienced by students with learning disabilities. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities 10(2)71-78.

  • Hall K. M. Sabey B. L & McClean M. (2005). Expository text comprehension: helping primary -grade teachers use expository text to full advantage. Reading Psychology 26(3) 211-234.

  • Hawke J. L. Olson R. K Willcutt E. G. Wads Worth S. J. & DeFries J.C. (2009). Geber ratios for reading difficulties. Dyslexia 15(3) 239-242.

  • Heilman A.W. (1998). Phonics Improper Perceptive Columbus. OH : Merill

  • Hunt N. & Marshall K. J. (2012). Exceptional children and youth. (5th ed.) Belmont CA: Wadsworth: Cengage Learning

  • Jenkins S. (2009). How to maintain school reading success. Five recommendations from a struggling male reader. The Reading Teacher 63(2) 159-162.

  • Jetton T. L. & Dole J. A. (2004). Adolescent literacy research and practice. USA: the Guilford Press.

  • Jeynes W. & Littell S. (2000). A Meta-analysis of studies examining the effect of whole language instruction on the literacy of low-SES students. Elementary School Journal 101(1) 21-33.

  • Johnson D. W. & Johnson R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone. (5th Ed) Boston MA: Allyn and Bacon

  • Johnston R. & Logan S. (2010). Investigating gender differences in reading. Educational Review 62(2) 175-187.

  • Jozwik S. L. (2015). Effective of explicit reading comprehension strategy instruction for English learners with specific learning disabilities. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation Illinois State University

  • Kavale K. A. and Reece J. H. (1992). The character of learning disabilities: An Iowa Profile. Learning Disabilities Quarterly 15(2) 74-94.

  • Kingberg M. (2007). Teaching reading in the content area for elementary teacher. USA: Shell Education

  • Klingner J. K. Urbach J. Golos D. Brownell M. & Menon S. (2010). Teaching reading in the 21st Century: A glimpse at how special education teachers promote reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly 33(2) 59-74.

  • Klingner J. K. Vaughn S. and Boardman A. (2015). Teaching reading comprehension to students with difficulties. (2nd ed) New York: London. The Guilford Press

  • Klingner J. K Vaughan S. Boardman A. & Swanson. E. (2012b). Now we get it! Boosting comprehension with collaborative strategic reading. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass

  • LeDoux A. (2007). Investigating the implementation of whole language: Strengths and weaknesses. Unpublished Master’s Thesis Dominican University California

  • Ling P (2012). The “whole language” theory and its application to the teaching of English Reading. English Language Teaching 5(3) 147-152

  • Liu P.L (2013). implementations of the whole language in Hong Kong Kindergartners: the teacher’s perspective. Open Journal of Modern Linguistic 3(3) 167-173.

  • Macceca S. (2007). Reading strategies for science. USA. Shell Education

  • Mastropieri M. A. & Scruggs T. E. (2002). Effective Instruction for Special Education. (3rd Eds ) Austin TX: Pro-ed

  • McCowan M. A. (2013). The effects of collaborative strategic reading on informational text comprehension and metacognitive awareness of fifth grade students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation Liberty University Lynchburg VA

  • Michalsky T. Mevarech Z. R. & Haibi L. (2009). Elementary school children reading scientific texts. Effect Metacognitive instruction. The Journal of Educational Research 102(5). 363-374.

  • Milagros R. (2012). Enhancing the reading strategies of parents of English Language learners through reading strategies and intervention (RSI) workshops. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation University of Central Florida Orlando.

  • Myklebust H. R. (1971). The pupils rating scale: screening for learning disabilities. New York : Grune and Stratton

  • Newman L. (2006). facts from NLTS2: General Education participation and academic performance of students with learning disabilities. Menlo Park CA: SRI International

  • Njenga J. (2010). Evaluation of the effectiveness of corporative learning structures in improving student’s performance. Unpublished Master’s Thesis Louisiana State University

  • Pappas C. C. (1993). Is narrative “primary” Some interesting insight from kindergarteners. Pretend reading of stories and information books. Journal of Reading Behaviour 25(1) 97-129.

  • Prado L. Plourde L. A. (2011). Increasing reading comprehension through the explicit reading strategies: Is there a difference among the genders? Reading improvement 48(1) 32-43.

  • Quinn J.M & Wagner R.K (2013). Gender differences in reading impairment and in the identification of impaired reader: results from larger scale studies of at risk readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities 20(10) 1-13.

  • Rankin-Erickson J.L. & Pressley M. (2000). A Survey of instructional practices of special education teachers nominated as effective teachers literacy. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 15(4) 206 - 225.

  • Rathvon N. (2008). Effective school intervention: evidence based strategies for improving student’s outcome. USA the Guilford Press

  • Reyner J. (2008). The reading wars: Phonics VS whole language. Retrieved from http://Jan.ucc.nau.edu/-jar/Readingwars.html

  • Richards J. C. & Rodgers T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. (Ed) Newyork Cambridge University Press

  • Robb L. (1994). Whole language whole learners: Creating a literature based classroom. New York N Y William Morrow and Company Inc.

  • Rop C. J. (2003). Spontaneous injury questions in higher school Chemistry classroom. Perceptions of a group of motivated learners. International Journal of Science Education 25(1) 13-33.

  • Rutter M. Caspi A. Fergusson D. Horwood L. J. Goodman R. Maughan B. Moffitt T. E. Meltzer H. & Carrol J. (2004). Sex differences in developmental reading disability New finding from 4 epidemiological studies. Journal of American Medical Association 291(16) 2007-2012

  • Schiefele U. (1996). Topic interest text representation and qualities of experience. Contemporary educational psychology 21(1) 3-18.

  • Seacrist K. M. (2012). The effect of collaborative strategic reading for fourth graders with learning disabilities. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Rowan University.

  • Sejnost R. L. & Thiese S. M. (2010). Building content literacy: strategies for the adolescent leaners. Thousand Oaks CA: Corwin Press

  • Shaw P. A. (1991). A selected review of research on whole language. Journal of the Wisconson State reading Assosciation 35(1) 3-17.

  • Shaywitz S. E. Shaywitz B. A. Fletcher J. M. & Escobar M. D. (1990). Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls: results of the Connecticut Longitudinal study. Journal of the American Medical Association 264(8) 998-1002.

  • Sideridis G. D. (2005). Performance approach-avoidance motivation and planned behavior theory. Model stabilities with Greek students with and without learning disabilities. Reading and Writing Quarterly 21(4) 331-359.

  • Siegel L. & Smythe I. S. (2005). Reflections on research on reading disabilities with special attention to gender issues. Journal of learning disabilities 38(5) 473-477

  • Snow C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Towards an R and D programme in reading comprehension. Saint Monica CA: Rand Gersten R Fuchs L.S Williamss J.P and Baker S (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilitie: A review of research. Review of educational research 71(2) 279-320.

  • Stahl S. & Miller P. D. (1989). Whole language and language experience for beginning reading. A quantitative research synthesis Review of Educational Research 59(1) 87-116.

  • Stone C.A. Siliman E.R. Ehren B. J. & Apel K. (2004). Handbook of language and literacy: development and disorders. USA: the Guilford Press

  • Swanson E. (2008). Observing reading instruction for students with learning disabilities. A synthesis. Learning Disability Quarterly 31(3) 115-133.

  • Swanson E. A. & Vaughn S. (2010). An observation study of reading instruction provided to elementary students with learning disabilities in the resource room. Psychology in the school 47(5) 481-492.

  • Vaughan S. Levy S. Colman M. & Bos C. S. (2002). Reading instruction for students with LD and EBD: A synthesis of observational studies The Journal of Special Education 36(1) 2-13.

  • Vaughn S. Roberts G. Klingner J. K. Swanson E. A. Boardman A. Stillman- Spisak S. J. Mohammed S. J. & Leroux A. J. (2013). Intervention evaluation and policy studies: Collaborative Strategic Reading: Findings from experienced implementers. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 6(2) 137-163.

  • Ward-Lonerger J. M. (2010). Expository discourse in school age children and adolescent with language disorders: Nature of the Problem. In Nippold M.A & Scott C. M. (Eds). Expository discourse in children adolescent and adult: development and disorders. New York: Psychology Press.

  • Weir R. (1990). Philosophy cultural beliefs and literacy. Interchange. 21(4)24-33

  • Williams J. P. (2005). Instructions in reading comprehension for primary- grade students. A focus on text structure The Journal of Special Education 39(1) 6-18.

  • Williams J. P. Hall K.M & Lauer K. D. (2004). Teaching expository text structure to young at - risk learners: Building the basics of comprehension instruction. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal 12(3) 129-144.

  • Willis A. I. (2008). Reading comprehension research and testing in the US. Under current of race class and power in the struggle for meaning. New York: Taylor and Francis Group LLC

  • Yates G. C. R. (1988). Classroom research into effective teaching. Australian Journal of remedial Education 20(1) 4-9.

  • Yen Chi-Fan Y. (2009). Implementing collaborative strategic reading (CSR) in an EFL context in Taiwan. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation University of Leicester

  • Yitzchak F. M. D. (2014). Specific learning disabilities USA. Oxford University Press

  • Yoo S. Y. (1996). A study of how early childhood teachers beliefs reflects their use of the whole language and traditional approaches. A quantitative and qualitative analysis. Ann Arbor M.I A Bell and Howell Company

  • Ziyaeemeehr Z. (2012). The efficacy of collaborative strategic reading on the reading comprehension of ESP learners. Higher Education of Social Science 2(1) 38-42.

Journal information
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 521 265 23
PDF Downloads 298 147 7