Toward a formal model of semantic change: A neo-Reichenbachian approach to the development of the Vedic past tense system

  • 1 UiT – The Arctic University of Norway


This paper explores some ways in which a neo-Reichenbachian time-relational framework can be applied to diachronic data. The target language of this study is Vedic Sanskrit, the language of the sacred texts of Hinduism. The main focus of the paper concerns the evolution of the Vedic past tense system, which at the beginning of the Vedic tradition is aspect-based and later develops into a system where temporal remoteness and evidentiality distinctions determine the distribution of the past tense categories. This language therefore offers a particularly intriguing data set for exploring the diachronic relationship between aspect, proximal tense and evidentiality, a field of diachronic semantics which has only received limited attention in the research literature.

Falls das inline PDF nicht korrekt dargestellt ist, können Sie das PDF hier herunterladen.

  • Bary, Corien. 2009. Aspect in Ancient Greek. A semantic analysis of the aorist and imperfective. Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen. (PhD dissertation.)

  • Bloomfield, Maurice. 1897. Hymns of the Atharva-veda. Oxford: Clarendon.

  • Bybee, Joan & Dahl, Östen. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13(1). 51-103.

  • Bybee, Joan & Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Chierchia, Gennaro & McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 2000. Meaning and Grammar. An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Dahl, Eystein. 2008. Performative Sentences and the Morphosyntax-Semantics Interface in Early Vedic. Journal of South Asian Linguistics 1. 7-27.

  • Dahl, Eystein. 2009a. Some Semantic and pragmatic aspects of object alternation in Old Vedic. In Barðdal, Jóhanna & Chelliah, Shobana (eds.), The Role of Semantics and Pragmatics in the Development of Case, 23-55. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • Dahl, Eystein. 2009b. Semantische und pragmatisch-kontextuelle Faktoren in der Entwicklung des altindoarischen Perfekts. In Rieken, Elisabeth & Widmer, Paul (eds.), Pragmatische Kategorien. Form, Funktion und Diachronie. Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft in Marburg, 24.-26.9.2007, 35-50.

  • Wiesbaden: Reichert.

  • Dahl, Eystein. 2009c. Reconstructing Inflectional Semantics: The Case of the Proto-Indo-European Imperfect. In Jamison, Stephanie W. & Melchert, H. Craig & Vine, Brent (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, 37-52. Bremen: Ute Hempen Verlag.

  • Dahl, Eystein. 2010. Time, Tense and Aspect in Early Vedic Grammar. Exploring Inflectional Semantics in the Rigveda. Leiden: Brill.

  • Dahl, Eystein. 2012. Evidence for Evidentiality in Late Vedic. In Klein, Jared & Yoshida, Kazuhiko (eds.), Indic across the Millennia: from Rigveda to Modern Indo-Aryan. 14th World Sanskrit Conference, Kyoto, Japan, September 1-5 2009. Proceedings of the Linguistics Section, 9-23. Bremen: Ute Hempen Verlag.

  • Dahl, Eystein. 2013. Typological change in Vedic: The development of the Aorist from a Perfective Past to an Immediate Past. In Josephson, Folke & Söhrman, Ingemar (eds.), Diachronic and Typological Perspectives on Verbs, 261-298. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • Dahl, Eystein. 2014. The Development of the Vedic Perfect: From Anterior to Inferential Past. In Klein, Jared & Tucker, Elizabeth (eds.), Vedic and Sanskrit Historical Linguistics: Papers from the 13th World Sanskrit Conference, 179-242. New Dehli: Motilal Banarshidas.

  • Dahl, Östen. 1984. Temporal distance: remoteness distinctions in tense-aspect systems. In Butterworth, Brian & Comrie, Bernhard & Dahl, Östen (eds.), Explanations for Language Universals, 105-121. Berlin: Mouton.

  • Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Delbrück, Berthold. 1876. Altindische Tempuslehre. Halle a. S.: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.

  • Delbrück, Berthold. 1888. Altindische Syntax. Halle a. S.: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.

  • Delbrück, Berthold. 1897. Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen. Zweiter Theil. Strassburg: Trübner.

  • Eberle, Kurt & Kasper, Walter. 1994. French past tenses and temporal structure. In Thieroff, Rolf & Ballweg, Joachim (eds.), Tense System in European Languages, 149-172. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

  • Eckardt, Regine. 2006. Meaning Change in Grammaticalization. An Enquiry into Semantic Reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Fintel, Kai von. 1995. The formal semantics of grammaticalization. In: Beckman, Jill M. (ed.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society (NELS) 25(2), 175-189. GLSA, Department of Linguistics, Umass at Amherst.

  • Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Jamison, Stephanie W. 1993. Natural History Notes on the Rigvedic ‘Frog’ Hymn. Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute 72-73. 138-144.

  • Kamp, Hans & Reyle, Uwe. 1993. From Discourse to Logic. Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1998. Aspect and Event Structure in Vedic. In Singh, Rajendra (ed.), The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 1998. New Dehli-Thousand Oaks-London: Sage Publications.

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 2002. Event Structure and the Perfect. In Beaver, David I. & Casillas Martínez, Luis D. & Clark, Brady Z. & Kaufmann, Stefan (eds.), The Construction of Meaning. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 2005. The Vedic Injunctive: Historical and synchronic implications. In: The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2005. New Dehli-Thousand Oaks-London: Sage Publications.

  • Klein, Jared. 1978. The Particle u in the Rigveda. A Synchronic and Diachronic Study. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.

  • Klein, Wolfgang. 1995. A Time-Relational Analysis of Russian Aspect. Language 71. 669-695.

  • Kratzer, Angelica. 1998. More Structural Analogies between Pronouns and Tenses. In Strolovitch, Devon & Lawson, Aaron (eds.), Proceedings of SALT VII, 92-110. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  • Krifka, Manfred. 1998. The origins of telicity. In Rothstein, Susan (ed.), Events and Grammar, 197-235. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Kulikov, Leonid. 2013. Language vs. grammatical tradition in Ancient India: How real was Pāṇinian Sanskrit? Evidence from the history of late Sanskrit passives and pseudo-passives. Folia Linguistica Historica 34. 59-91.

  • Olivelle, Patrick. 1996. Upaniṣads. A new translation by Patrick Olivelle. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Portner, Paul H. 2007. Imperatives and Modals. Natural Language Semantics 15. 351-383.

  • Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. London: Macmillan.

  • Schaden, Gerhard. 2009. Present perfects compete. Linguistics and Philosophy 32. 115-141.

  • Schaden, Gerhard. 2012. Modelling the “Aoristic Drift of the Present Perfect” as Inflation An Essay in Historical Pragmatics. International Review of Pragmatics 4. 261-292.

  • Smith, Carlota. 1997. The Parameter of Aspect. Second Edition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Smith, Carlota. 2003. Modes of Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Alan B. 2005. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Whitney, William Dwight. 1905. Atharva-Veda Saṁhitā translated with a critical and exegetical commentary (2 Volumes). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Witzel, Michael. 1989. Tracing the vedic dialects. In Caillat, Colette (ed.), Dialectes dans les langues indoaryennes, 97-265. Paris: College de France, Institut de Civilisation Indienne.

  • Witzel, Michael. 1995. Early Indian History: Linguistic and Textual Parameters. In: Erdosy, G. (ed.), Language, Material Culture and Ethnicity. The Indo-Aryans of Ancient South Asia, 85-125. Berlin-New York: de Gruyter.


Zeitschrift + Hefte