Re-shaping King Lear: Space, Place, Costume, and Genre

Open access

Abstract

Performance studies must enjoy parity of esteem with critical studies because they remind us of the plurality of “readings” that are generated by a Shakespearean text. Shakespeare seems to have apprehended this when, in Othello, he used a nonce-word, “denotement”, which applies to Othello’s reading of his wife in his mind’s eye. I examine other sequences in which we watch a character “reading” on-stage or imagined action, in Hamlet, Titus Andronicus, Cymbeline, Richard II, and Troilus and Cressida. In Hamlet this involves re-reading as well as generic displacement, which, I argue, is a way of rendering inwardness. As I test case, I analyse a production of King Lear by Shakespeare’s Globe, on a fairground stage, in which the king reshaped himself, became a folkloric figure, like a figure in Nashe’s Summer’s Last Will and Testament. The play itself was thus, indecorously, reshaped as “The Tale of King Lear”. “Dramatic truth”, therefore, in no way depends upon theatrical “realism”.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Berry Philippa. Shakespeare’s Feminine Ending: Disfiguring Death in the Tragedies. London: Routledge 1999. Print.

  • Bruner Jerome S. Actual Minds Possible Worlds. Kindle ed. Cambridge Mass.; London: Harvard University Press 1986. Web.

  • Culler Jonathan. Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1997. Print.

  • Dawkins Richard. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press rev. edn. 1989. Print.

  • Derrida Jacques. Of Grammatology. Trans. Spivak Gayatri Chakravorty. Baltimore Md 1976. Print.

  • Dessen Alan C. and Leslie Thomson. A Dictionary of Stage Directions in English Drama 1580-1642. Cambridge U.K.; New York: Cambridge University Press 1999. Print.

  • Eliot T.S. “Shakespeare and the Stoicism of Seneca.” Selected Essays. London: Faber 1951 edn. Print.

  • Freud Sigmund. Collected Papers Volume 4. New York: Basic Books Inc 1959. Print.

  • Greville Fulke. “A Treatie of Humane Learning.” Five Courtier Poets of the English Renaissance. Ed. Bender Robert M. New York: Washington Square Press 1969. Print.

  • Keats John. “Letter to Richard Woodhouse 27 October 1818.” Letters of John Keats. Ed. Page Frederick. London: Oxford University Press 1954. Print.

  • Maus Katharine Eisaman. Inwardness and Theater in the English Renaissance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1995. Print.

  • McConachie Bruce A. and F. Elizabeth Hart. Performance and Cognition: Theatre Studies and the Cognitive Turn. London: Routledge 2006. Print.

  • Nashe Thomas. The Unfortunate Traveller and Other Works. Ed. Steane J.B. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books 1972. Print.

  • Ogden C. K. and I. A. Richards. The Meaning of Meaning. [S.l.]: K. Paul 1923. Print.

  • Patricia Parker. “Shakespeare and Rhetoric: ‘Dilation’ and ‘Delation’.” Shakespeare and the Question of Theory. Eds. Parker Patricia and Geoffrey Hartman. New York: Routledge 1985. 54-74. Print.

  • Parker Patricia. “(De)Noting and Slander’.” Shakespeare 450. Paris 2014. Conference paper.

  • Shakespeare William. King Richard II. Ed. Gurr Andrew. Cambridge1984. Print.

  • Shakespeare William. The Tragedy of King Lear. Ed. Halio Jay L. Updated ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005. Print.

  • Rossky William. “Imagination in the English Renaissance: Psychology and Poetic.” Studies in the Renaissance 5.1958 (1958): 49-73. Print.

  • Ryan Kiernan. “‘Prosper on the Top (Invisible): Power and Perception in Shakespeare.” Shakespeare 450. Paris 2014. Conference Paper.

  • Shakespeare William. King Richard II. Ed. Gurr Andrew. Cambridge1984. Print.

  • Wellek Rene and Austin Warren. Theory of Literature. (Third Edition Reissued.). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books 1973. Print.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 531 385 12
PDF Downloads 233 186 8