The structure and spatial heterogeneity of zooplankton in small lake river Wel (Poland)

Open access


The aim of the study was to determine changes in potamoplankton structure caused by lakes in the fluvial system of the small River Wel. The river flows through 10 lakes. The study was conducted in 2007 and 2008. The selection of sites enabled the assessment of the impact exerted by hydrological conditions of the river on zooplankton, as well as the determination of the effect of lakes situated within the river course on the analysed assemblage of organisms. In total 95 species were determined with an average abundance 1026 ind. 10 dm-3. Rotifers dominated qualitatively and quantitatively and among crustaceans - Copepods. Lakes seem to be the main source of zooplankton in the fluvial system of the Wel River. The lakes disturb the river continuum, but their impact on the structure of zooplankton is short-lived. Due to the presence of flow-through lakes along the river, species richness of zooplankton in the Wel River is similar to that in large rivers.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Allan I.D. 1998 Ekologia wod ptyn^cych (The stream eco- logy. Structure and function of running waters) PWN Warszawa p. 452 (Polish edition).

  • Basu K.B. Pick F.R. 1996 Factors regulating phytoplank- ton and zooplankton biomass in temperate rivers Lim- nol.Oceanogr.41(7): 1572-1577.

  • Burger D.F. Hogg I.D. Green I.D. 2002 Distribution and abundance of zooplankton in the Waikato River New Zeeland Hydrobiologia 479; 31-38.

  • Chang K.H. Doi H. Imai H. Gunji F. Nakano I. 2008 Lon- gitudial changes in zooplankton distribution below a re- servoir outfall with reference to river planktivory Lim- nology 9: 125-133.

  • Clarke K.R. 1993 Non-parametric multivariate analysis of changes in community structure Austral. 1. Ecol 18:117-143. Czamecka H. (ed.) 2005 Atlas podziahi hydrograficznego Polski. Cz. 1: Mapy w skali 1:200000 Cz. 2: Zestanie- nie zlewni (Atlas of the hydrographic division of Poland. Part 1: Maps in 1:200000 scale Part 2: Tabulation of ri- ver basins) Wyd. IMGW Warszawa p. 562.

  • Czerniawski R„ 2008 Ihe effect of flow-through reservoirs on zooplankton of the Plonia river Pol. ]. Nat. Sc. 23(3): 583-597.

  • Czerniawski R. Domagala |. 2010 Similarities in zooplank- ton community between River Drawa and its two tribu- taries (Polish part of River Odra) Hydrobiologia 638: 137-149.

  • Czerniawski R. Domagala J. 2012 Potamozooplankton communities in three different outlets from mesotro- phic lakes located in lake-river s)'stem Oceanol. Hydro- biol. Stud. 41:46-56.

  • Dembowska E. Qogowska B. Krokwiriska A. 2009 Dyna- mics of algae communities in pond and stream in To- run Limnol. Papers 4(1): 41-53.

  • Demetraki-Paleolog A. 2004 Planktonic rotifers diversity in selected rivers of the Vistula Wieprz and San draina- ge-basins Teka Kom.Ochr. Kszt. Srod. Przyrod. 1:44-50.

  • Demet raki-Paleolog A. 2007 Wrotki (Rotifera) plank- tonowe rzek zachodnie) Lubelszczyzny (Planktonic ro- tifers (Rotifera) in rivers of western Lublin Region) Ro- zpr. Nauk. 317 W)'cL AR Lubl. Lublin p. 122 (in Polish).

  • Edmondson W.T. Winberg G.G. 1971 A manual on the methods for the assessment of secondary productivi- ty in fresh waters IBP Handbook No. 17 Blackwell ScL Publ. Oxford p. 358.

  • Ejsmont-Karabin J.Wtjglehska T. 1996 Przemiany struktu- ry zooplanktonu w strefach przejsciowych rzeka-jezioro- rzeka: System rzeki Krutyni Pojezierze Mazurskie (TYans- formation of the zooplankton structure in the transitio- nal zones of river-lake-river: System of the Krutynia Ri- ver Masurian lakeland) [in:] The functioning of river-lake systems in lakeland landscape: Krutynia River (Masurian Lakeland Poland Zesz. Nauk. Kom Nauk “Czlowiek i Sro- dowisko” PAN 13:263-289 (in Polish English summary).

  • Ejsmont-Karabin J.. Kruk \L. 1998. Effect of contrasting land use on free-swimming rotifer communities of stre- ams in Masurien Lake District. Poland. Hvdrobiologia 387/388: 241-249.

  • Golterman H.J. 1971 Methods for chemical analysis of fresh waters IBP Handbook No. 8 Blackwell ScL Publ. Oxford p. 165.

  • Greenberg A.E. Clesceri L.S. Eaton A.D. (eds) 1992 Stan- dard methods for the examination of water and waste- water APHA- AWWA-WEF Washington.

  • Harris R.P. Wiebe P.H. Lenz J. Skjoldal H.R. Huntley M. (eds) 2000 Zooplankton methodology manual ICES Academic Press London p. 684.

  • Havel I.E. Shurin J.B. 2004 Mechanisms effects and scales of dispersal in freshwater zooplankton Limnol. Ocean- ogr. 49(4 part 2): 1229-1238.

  • Hill T. Lewicki P. 2005 Statistics: methods and applica- tions StatSoft Inc. Tulsa p. 800.

  • Hillbricht-Ilkowska A. 1999 Shallow lakes in lowland ri- ver systems: Role in transport and transformations of nutrients and in biological diversity Hydrobiologia 408/409: 349-358.

  • Kasprzak K. Niedbala W„ 1981 Wskazniki biocenotyczne stosowane przy porz^dkowaniu i analizie danych w ba- daniach ilosciowych (Biocenotic indicators used for or- dering and analyzing data in quantitive research) [in:] Gomy M. Griim L (eds) Metody stosowane w zoologii gleby (Methods used in soil zoology) PWN Warszawa: 397-408 (in Polish).

  • Kentzer A. Dembowska E. Gizinski A. Napiorkowski P. 2010 Influence of the Wloctawek Reservoir on hydro- chemistry and plankton of a large lowland river (the Lower Vistula River Poland) Ecol. Eng. 36(12): 1747-1753.

  • Kobayashi T. 1997 Associations between environmental variables and zooplankton body masses in regulated Australian river Mar. Freshwater Res. 48(6): 523-529.

  • Kononova O.N. 2009 Zooplankton in the Vychegda River InLWaL Biol. 2(2): 149-156.

  • Lampert W Sommer U. 2007 Limnoecology: The Ecology of Lakes and Streams Oxford University Press Oxford p. 324.

  • Mameffe Y. Descy J.P. Thome J.P. 1996 The zooplankton of the lower river Meuse Belgium: seasonal changes and impact of industrial and municipal discharges Hydro- biologia 319:1-13.

  • McCauley E. 1984 The estimation of abundance and bio- mass of zooplankton in samples [in:] Downing J.A. Ri- gler F.H. (eds) A manual on methods for assessment of secondary productivity in fresh waters IBP Handbook No. 17 Blackwell Sci. Publ. Oxford: 228-261.

  • Mieszczankin T. 2000 Total and non-living suspended matter of the lower Vistula River. Part V Limnol. Papers 21:44-50.

  • Mieszczankin T. 2009 The influence of the saline industrial contaminants on the water quality of the Vistula River near the city of Torun Limnol. Papers 4(1): 25-32.

  • Napiorkowski P. Kentzer A. Dembowska E. 2006 Zoo- plankton of the lower Vistula River: the effect of Wto- clawek Dam Reservoir (Poland) on community structu- re Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol. 29:2109-2114.

  • Napiorkowski P. Napiorkowska T. 2013 The diversity and longitudinal changes of zooplankton in the lower cour- se of large regulated European river (the lower Vistula River Poland) Biologia 68(6): 1163-1171.

  • Nogrady T„ Wallace R.L. Snell T. 1993 Rotifera 1. Biolo- gy Ecology and Systematics [in:] Dumont H.J.F. (ed.) Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World Pt. 4 SPB Acad. Publ. BV. The Hague p. 142.

  • Operacz M. Kentzer A. Nowaczyk L. 2011 The content of nitrogen compounds in the Wei River in the light of the Nitrates Directive Ecological Questions 15:23-29.

  • Pourriot R. Rougier C. Miquelis A. 1997 Origin and de- velopment of river zooplankton: example of the Marne Hydrobiologia 345:143-148. Sandlund O.T. 1982 The drift of zooplankton and microzo- obenthos in the river Strandaelva western Norway Hy- drobiologia 94:33-48.

  • Shurin J.B. and Havel J.E. 2003. Hydrologic connections as dispersal routs for the spread of exotic cladoceran Daph- nia lumholtzi. Biol. Invasions 4:431439.

  • Szlauer B. 1977 The zooplankton removal from lakes by the river Plonia Acta Ichth. Piscat. 7(1): 59-76.

  • Szlauer B. Szlauer L 1994 Zooplankton nzeki Odry w Szczecinie (The zooplankton of Oder River in Szczecin) Zesz. Nauk. AR Szczec. 164:23-39 (in Polish).

  • Thorp J.H. Caspar A.F. 2003 Importance of biotic interac- tions in large rivers: An experiment with planktivorous fish dreissenid mussels and zooplankton in the St. Law- rence River River Res. Applic. 19:265-279.

  • Vadadi-Fulop Cs. 2009 Zooplankton (Cladocera Copepo- da) dynamics in the River Danube upstream and down- stream of Budapest Hungary Opusc. Zool. 40(2): 87-98. van Dijk G.M. van Zanten B. 1995 Seasonal changes in zooplankton abundance in the lower Rhine during 1987-1991 Hydrobiologia 304:29-38.

  • Vannotte R.L Minshall G.W. Cummins K.W. Sedell J.R. Cushing C.E. 1980 The river continuum concept Can. I. Fish.Aquat.Sci.37:130-137.

  • Viroux L. 1997 Zooplankton development in two lar- ge lowland rivers the Moselle (France) and the Meuse (Belgium) in 1993 J. Plankton Res. 19(11): 1743-1762.

  • Viroux L. 1999 Zooplankton distribution in flowing waters and its implication for sampling: case studies in the Ri- ver Meuse (Belgium) and the River Moselle (France Lu- xembourg) I. Plankton Res. 21(7): 1231-1248.

  • Walks D.J. Cyr H. 2004 Movement of plankton through la- ke-stream systems. Freshwater Biol. 49:745-759.

  • Ward J.V. Stanford J.A. 1995 The serial discontinuity con- cept: extending the model to floodplain rivers Reg. Riv. Res. Manage. 10:159-168.

  • Welker M. Walz N. 1998 Can mussels control the plank- ton in rivers?- a planktonological approach applying a LagTangian sampling strategy Limnol. Oceanogr. 43(5): 153-162.

  • Welker M. Walz N. 1999 Plankton dynamics in a river-la- ke system - on continuity and discontinuity Hydrobio- logia 408/409: 233-239.

  • Zimmermann-Timm H. Holst H. Kausch H. 2007 Spatial dynamics of rotifers in a large lowland river the Elbe Germany: How important are retentive shoreline habi- tats for plankton community? Hydrobiologia 593: 49-58.

  • Zurek R. 2000 Diversity of flora and fauna in running wa- ters of the Province of Cracov (Southern Poland) in re- lation to water quality. 4. Zooseston Acta Hydrobiol. 42(3/4): 331-345.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 141 72 3
PDF Downloads 71 51 0