Academic and Literary Communication: Addressability, Statuses, and Functioning

Open access

Abstract

The article addresses the issue of creation and functioning of each link in the communication chain addresser/sender-message-addressee/recipient in three communicative statuses: external, internal, and potential. Personal and transpersonal communication is analyzed. Semantic and functional features of academic vs literary communication are considered.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Arutyunova N.D. (1981). The factor of the addressee.In Izvestiya AN SSSR: Series of literature and language 40 (4) p. 367-386. / Arutyunova N.D. Faktor adresata. In Izvestiya AN SSSR: Seriya literatura i yazyk 40 (4) s. 367-386. / Арутюнова Н.Д. Фактор адресата. In Известия АН СССР: Серия литература и язык 40 (4) c. 367-386.

  • Bakhtin M.M. (1975). Problems of literature and aesthetics. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura. / Bakhtin M.M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki. Moskva: Khudozhestvennaya literature. / Бахтин M.М. Вопросы литературы и эстетики. Москва: Художественная литература.

  • Bakhtin M.M. (1979). Aesthetics of verbal creativity. Moscow: Iskusstvo. / Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. Moskva: Iskusstvo. / Бахтин M.М. Эстетика словесного творчества. Москва: Искусство.

  • Barthes R. (1989). Selected works: Semiotics: Poetics. Moscow: Progress. / Bart R. Izbrannyye raboty: Semiotika: Poetika. Moskva: Progress. / Барт Р. Избранные работы: Семиотика: Поэтика. Москва: Прогресс.

  • Berdayes V. (2018). Communication theory after the administered society: The “Total market” in the Writings of the Departamento Ecuménico de Investigaciones. In International journal of communication 12 Available at: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/8756/2411

  • Bolinger D. (1975). Aspects of language. New York: Harcourt Brace.

  • Bondarenko E.V. (2014). Matrix modeling. The duality of time in the English image of the world. Kharkov: V.N. Karazin Kharkov national university. / Bondarenko Ye.V. Matrichnoye modelirovaniye. Dual’nost’ vremeni v angloyazychnoj kartine mira. Kharkov: Khar’kovskij natsional’nyj universitet imeni V.N. Karazina. / Бондаренко Е.В. Матричное моделирование. Дуальность времени в англоязычной картине мира. Харьков: Харьковский национальный университет имени В.Н. Каразина.

  • Burke M. (2011). Literary reading Cognition and emotion: An exploration of the oceanic mind. New York: Routledge.

  • Burke M. (2015). The neuroaesthetics of prose fiction: Pitfalls parameters and prospects. In Frontiers in human neuroscience 9 p. 1-12. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00442

  • Chafe W. (2010). Literature as a window to the mind. In Acta linguistica hafniensia: International journal of linguistics 42 (1) p. 51-63.

  • Davies E. (2012). Translation and intercultural communication: Bridges and barriers. In The handbook of intercultural discourse and communication. Paulston C.B. Kiesling S.F. &Rangel E.S. (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing p. 367-388.

  • Davison M. (2008). Communication: Concepts practice and challenges. In Health education research 23 (3) June 2008 p. 369-370. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyn024

  • Fowler R. (1975). The new stylistics. In Style and structure in literature: Essays in the new stylistics. Oxford: Blackwell p. 3-11.

  • Freeman M.H. (2014). Cognitive poetics. In The Routledge handbook of stylistics. New York: Routledge p. 313-328.

  • Gnezdilova Ya. (2018). Metapragmatics of academic written discourse. In Lege artis. Language yesterday today tomorrow. The journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava. Warsaw: De Gruyter Open 2018 III (1) June 2018 p. 46-79. DOI: 10.2478/lart-2018-0002

  • Hall G. (2014). Pedagogical stylistics. In The Routledge handbook of stylistics. New York: Routledge p. 239-252.

  • Hyland K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses. Social interactions in academic writing. Michigan: The University of Michigan.

  • Hyland K. (2007). Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse. In Applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press 28 (2) p. 266-285.

  • Kamenskaya O.L. (1980). Text as a means of communication. In Linguistic problems of the text. Moscow: Moscow State Pedagogical University 158 p. 3-11. / Kamenskaya O.L. Tekst kak sredstvo kommunikatsii. In Lingvisticheskiye problemy teksta. Moskva: Moskovskij gosudarstvennyj pedagogicheskij universitet 158 s. 3-11. / Каменская О.Л. Текст как средство коммуникации. In Лингвистические проблемы текста. Москва: Московский государственный педагогический университет 158 c. 3-11.

  • Kolegaeva I.M. (2014). Museum catalogue article: A cognitive-communicative phenomenon. In Writings in Romance-Germanic philology 2 (33) p. 38-46. / Kolegaeva I.M. Stat’ya muzejnogo kataloga: Kognitivno-kommunikativnyj fenomen. In Zapysky z romano-hermansʹkoyi filolohiyi 2 (33) s. 38-46. / Колегаева И.М. Статья музейного каталога: Kогнитивно-коммуникативный феномен. In Записки з романо-германської філології 2 (33) с. 38-46.

  • Kolegaeva I.M. (2016). Cognition semiosis communication: The subjects of contemplation in the recent 25 years. In Writings in Romance-Germanic philology 1 (36) p. 58-76. / Kolegaeva I.M. Kognitsiya semiozis kommunikatsiya: O chem dumalos’ v minuvshiye 25 let. In Zapysky z romano-hermansʹkoyi filolohiyi 1 (36) s. 58-76. / Колегаева И.М. Когниция семиозис коммуникация: O чем думалось в минувшие 25 лет. In Записки з романо-германської філології 1 (36) с. 58-76. DOI: 10.18524/2307-4604.2016.1(36).78582

  • Lehrer J. (2012). Imagine: How creative mind works. Edinburgh-London: Canongate.

  • Luriya A.R. (1979). Language and consciousness. Moscow: Moscow state university publishing house. / Luriya A.R. Yazyk i soznaniye. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. / Лурия А.Р. Язык и сознание. Москва: Издательство Московского государственного университета.

  • Martin J.R. (2016). Meaning matters: A short history of systemic functional linguistics. In WORD 62 (1) p. 35-58. DOI: 10.1080/00437956.2016.1141939

  • Peterson M. (1961). Scientific thinking and scientific writing. Reinhold: Chapman and Hall.

  • Stepanov G.V. (1988). Language. Literature. Poetics. Moscow: Nauka. / Stepanov G.V. Yazyk. Literatura. Poetika. Moskva: Nauka. / Степанов Г.В. Язык. Литература. Поэтика. Москва: Наука.

  • Strochenko L.V. (2017). Verbalization of the subconcept PRODIGY in the novel “Matilda” by R. Dahl. In Writings in Romance-Germanic philology 2 (39) p. 124-129. / Strochenko L.V. Verbalizatsiya subkontseptu PRODIGY u romani R. Dala “Matilda”. In Zapysky z romano-hermansʹkoyi filolohiyi 2 (39) s. 124-129. / Строченко Л.В. Вербалізація субконцепту PRODIGY у романі Р. Дала “Matilda”. In Записки з романо-германської філології 2 (39) с. 124-129. DOI: 10.18524/2307-4604.2017.2(39).118625.

  • Strawson P.F. (1986). Intention and convention in speech acts. In New issues in foreign linguistics. Iss. XVII. The theory of speech acts. Moscow: Progress p. 130-150. / Strawson P.F. Namereniye i konventsiya v rechevykh aktakh. In Novoye v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. Vyp. XVII. Teoriya rechevykh aktov. Moskva: Progress s. 130-150. / Стросон П.Ф. Намерение и конвенция в речевых актах. In Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. XVII. Теория речевых актов. Москва: Прогресс c. 130-150.

  • Suomela-Salmi E. (2009). Cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspectives on academic discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • Turner G.W. (1973). Stylistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

  • Vorobyova O.P. (2017). ‘Haunted by ambiguities’ revisited: In search of a metamethod for literary text disambiguation. In Lege artis. Language yesterday today tomorrow. The journal of university of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava. Warsaw: De Gruyter Open 2017 II (1) June 2017 p. 428-496. DOI: 10.1515/lart-2017-0011

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 189 189 7
PDF Downloads 100 100 2