The Icelandic constitutional movement was created to address and develop a new constitutional form based upon transparency, responsibility and participation. Taking into consideration the events, which took place in 2008 this expectation appeared more than legitimate. Furthermore, the quality of the debate, which took place within the civil society and in the cooperation between civil society and Constitutional Council, are very meaningful elements supporting a genuine possibility of change. The aim of implementing a participation-based constitution may lead to the diversification of the Icelandic project with respect to the typology of the existing constitution. This may produce as a result the development of new checks and balances. For this reason the development of public local services may be an opportunity to develop a social balance with respect of the constitution in force, as well as a living constitution starting from below. In this way the values purported by civil society may lead to higher levels of political freedom and finally to the approval of a new constitution. To keep the Icelandic process communicatively open in a transnational perspective may thus permit other persons to contribute to the development of Icelandic democracy. It may furthermore offer the Icelandic example as a useful tool that could be used by many world societies aiming to implement transparency, responsibility and participation in their public life. Indeed, even though the Constitutional Bill of 2011 will not finally be validly approved as the Icelandic constitution, the problems that it posed, and the possibilities that we see are stemming from them, have in our opinion a general importance for constitutional reflections.
European Commission For Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission), Draft Opinion On The Draft New Constitution of Iceland, Strasbourg, 11 February 2013, Opinion N° 702 / 2013 Cdl(2013)005*), Prepared on the basis of comments by Ms Jacqueline De Guillenchmidt (Substitute Member, France), Mr Jan Helgesen (Member, Norway), Mr Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem (Member, Germany), Mr Jean-Claude Scholsem (Substitute Member, Belgium), Mr Jorgen Steen Sørensen (Member, Denmark). The opinion is also reprinted in D. Carrillo (ed.) and others, The Icelandic Federalist Papers, 2018, p. 191–243.
Frymus M., Nyks Ł., Policastro P. (2015), Great Green Wall: Africa for Africa, feature film produced by World Peace Lab and Nyks Media (executive producer), M. Frymus, director, Ł. Nyks, pictures, P. Policastro, scientific supervision.
T. Gylfason, A. Meuwese, Digital Tools and the Derailment of Iceland’s New Constitution, CESIFO working paper no. 5997
Jarrett E. (2015), Blueberry Soup, a documentary film directed by Eileen Jerrett, Wilma wishes productions, 2015.
Habermas J., Strukturwandel des Öffentlichkeit, Neuwied 1962; ed. it. Storia e critica dell’opinione pubblica, Roma–Bari 1985.
Kantorowicz E.H. (1957) The King’s Two Bodies:. A Study in Medieval Political Theology, with a new introduction by Conrad Leyser and a preface by William Chester Jordan, Princeton University Press, 2016.
Governmental Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 2018.
Luis Lopezllera-Mendez & Stephen De Meulenaere, Towards an Economy in the Hands of the People: The Tianguis Tlaloc Local Currency System in Mexico, International Journal of Community Currency Research 2000: Volume 4, ISSN 1325-9547.
Lijphart A., Patterns of Democracy. Governments Forms and Performance in 36 Countries, New Haven – London Yale University Press 1999, It. ed. Le democrazie contemporanee, Bologna, Il Mulino, 2001.
Nergelius J., Constitutional Reform in Sweden. Some important remarks, Tijdschrift voor Constitutioneel Recht, 2013 no 4, p. 372–379.
Neumann F. (1957), The Democratic and the Authoritarian State, New York, the Free Press, 1957. Italian edition, Lo stato democratico e lo stato autoritario, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1973.
Policastro P. (2002), Prawa podstawowe w demokratycznych transformacjach ustrojowych, Lublin 2002.
Policastro P. and Castorina E. (2013), Towards a Supranational Dimension of Citizenship Through Knowledge, Skills and Competence: From ECONET to the Great Green Wall, p. 89–96 in P. Policastro (ed.), Towards Innovation in Legal Education, Eleven, Utrecht 2013.
Policastro P. (2012), Constitutionalism vs. Economic Analysis: On the Use of Founding Theories and Complementary Theories in Constitutional Interpretation, in Stephan Kirste (Ed.), Anne van Aaken (Hrsg.), Michael Anderheiden (Hrsg.), Pasquale Policastro (Hrsg.) Interdisciplinary Research in Jurisprudence and Constitutionalism, ArchivfürRechts- und Sozialphilosophie – Beihefte (ARSP-B) Band 127, 173–203. p. 182.
P. Policastro , Constitutionalism, comparison, complexity: Prolegomena on Liberty and the use of Language for a Predictive Theory of Law, in E. Castorina, P. Policastro (eds.), Liberty and Language. The Global Dimension of European Constitutional Integration, Torino 2010, p. 15–109.
Policastro P. (2005), A New Garment for an Old Question: ‘A Clash between Man’s Rights and Citizens’ Rights in the Enlarged Europe?’ in: Joakim Nergelius (ed.), Nordic and other European Constitutional Traditions, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden–Boston, 2005, p. 61–92.
Policastro P. (2016), Biosfera, politica del diritto e educazione delle coscienze, in: E. Carnassa (ed.), Democrazie e Religioni. Libertà religiosa, diversità e convivenza nell’Europa del XXI secolo, Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, Napoli 2016.
Rensi G. (1902), La democrazia diretta, Milano, Adeplhi, 1995.
Sigrún Sigurðardóttir M., Young T. (2011), Towards Creative Iceland: building local, going global, Quantitative and qualitative mapping of the cultural and creative sectors in Iceland, May 2011.
Teubner G. (2016), La “matrice anonyme”: de la violation des droits de l’ homme pare les acteurs “privés” transnationaux, in Revue critique de droit international privé, octobre–decembre 2016, p. 591–984