More than Fitness. A Robustness-based Proposal of a Logical Space to Classify Processes Behind Evolutionary Phenomena

Giorgio Airoldi 1
  • 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), , Spain


The assumption that natural selection alone is sufficient to explain not only which traits get fixed in a population/species, but also how they develop, has been questioned since Darwin’s times, and increasingly in the last decades. Alternative theories, linked to genetic and phenotypic processes, or to the theory of complex systems, have been proposed to explain the rise of the phenotypic variety upon which natural selection acts. In this article, we illustrate the current state of the issue and we propose a logical space based on phenotypic robustness that allows a classification of evolutionary phenomena and can provide a framework for unifying all these accounts.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Alberch, P. (1991). From genes to phenotypes: dynamical systems and evolvability. Genetica 84, 5–11.

  • Birch, J. (2014), “Has Grafen formalized Darwin?”, Biol Philos, 29: 175–180.

  • Callebaut, W., Rasskin-Gutman, eds. (2005). Modularity. Understanding the Development and Evolution of Natural Complex Systems. The MIT Press.

  • Carlson, J.M., Doyle, J. (2002). Complexity and Robustness. PNSA, vol. 99, 2538–2545.

  • Charnov, E.L. (1976). Optimal Foraging, the Marginal Value Theorem, Theoretical Population Biology, Vol. 9, No. 2.

  • Daniels, B.C. et al. (2008), Sloppiness, robustness and evolvability in systems biology, Current Opinion in Biotecnology, 19: 389–395.

  • Dennet, D.C. (1995). Darwin’s Dangerous Idea, Penguin Books.

  • Draghi, J.A. et al. (2010). Mutational robustness can facilitate adaptation, Nature, 463: 353–355.

  • Eldredge, N. & Gould, S.J. (1972), Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism, in Models in paleobiology, Shopf, TJM Freeman, Cooper / Co.

  • Fisher, R.A. (1930). Genetical theory of natural selection. S.l.: Oxford Clarendon Press.

  • Gould S.J., Lewontin S.J. (1979), The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist program, Proc. R. Soc. Lon., B 205, 581–598.

  • Gould, J.S., Vrba, E.S. (1982), Exaptation – A Missing Term in the Science of Form, Paleobiology, Vol. 8, No. 1: 4–15.

  • Grafen, A. (1999) “Formal Darwinism, the individual-as-maximizing-agent and bet-edging”, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B., 266, 799–803.

  • Grafen, A. (2000) “Development of the Price equation and natural selection under uncertainty” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B., 267, 1223–1227.

  • Grafen, A. (2002) “A first formal link between the Price equation and an optimization program”, J. Theor. Biol. 217, 75–91.

  • Grafen, A. (2007) “The Formal Darwinism project: a mid-term report”, J. Evol. Biol., 1243–1254.

  • Grafen, A. (2014a) “The formal Darwinism project in outline”, Biol Philos, 29: 155–174.

  • Grafen, A. (2014b) “The formal Darwinism project in outline: response to commentaries”, Biol Philos, 29: 281–292

  • Haldane, J.B. (1932). The Causes of Evolution. Longmans Green.

  • Hall, B.K. (2003a). Evo-Devo: evolutionary developmental mechanisms. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 47: 491–495.

  • Hall, B.K. (2003b). Unlocking the Black Box between Genotype and Phenotype: Cells and Cell Condensations as Morphogenetic (modular) Units. Biol. & Philos., 18: 219–247.

  • Kauffman, S., (2000). Investigations. Oxford University Press.

  • Kimura, M. (1983). The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press.

  • Kitano, H. (2004). Biological robustness. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5(11), 826–837. doi:10.1038/nrg1471.

  • Kitano, H (2007). Towards a theory of biological robustness. Molecular Systems Biology, 3(1), 137-n/a. doi:10.1038/msb4100179.

  • Lenski, R.E., Barrick, J.E., & Ofria, C. (2006). Balancing robustness and evolvability. PLoS Biology, 4(12), e428. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040428

  • Masel, J., & Siegal, M.L. (2009). Robustness: Mechanisms and consequences. Trends in Genetics, 25(9), 395–403. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2009.07.005.

  • Maturana, H., & Varela, F.J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

  • Haldane, J.B. (1932). The Causes of Evolution. Longmans Green.

  • McShea, D., Brandon, R. (2010). Biology’s First Law: the tendency for diversity and complexity to increase in evolutionary systems. The University of Chicago Press.

  • Mills, S., Beatty, J. (1979), The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness, Philosophy of Science, 46: 263–286.

  • Millstein, R.L. (2006). Natural selection as a population-level causal process. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57(4):627–653.

  • Mocczek, A.P. (2008). On the origins of novelty in development and evolution. BioEssays 30: 432–477.

  • Neander, K. (1995). Pruning the Tree of Life. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 46(1): 59–80.

  • Orzack, S.H. & Sober, E.R., eds. (2001). Adaptationism and Optimality. Cambridge University Press.

  • Parker, G., Maynard Smith, J. (1990). Optimality theory in evolutionary biology, Nature, 348: 27–33.

  • Pigliucci, M. (2008). Is evolvability evolvable? Nature Reviews Genetics, 9(1), 75–82. doi:10.1038/nrg2278.

  • Popper, K. (2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge.

  • Price, G.R. (1972). Fisher’s ‘fundamental theorem’ made clear. Annals of Human Genetics, 36(2), 129.

  • Prum, R.O. (1999). Development and evolutionary origin of feathers. J. Exp. Zool. B Moi. Dev. Evol. 285: 391–306.

  • Rice SH (2004) Evolutionary Theory: Mathematical and Conceptual Foundations. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

  • Rosenberg, A. (1982). On the Propensity Definition of Fitness. Philosophy of Science, Vol. 49, No. 2:268–273.

  • Rosenberg, A., Williams, M. (1986). Fitness as Primitive and Propensity. Philosophy of Science, Vol. 53, No. 3:412–418.

  • Sober, E. (1998) Six Sayings about Adaptationism in D. Hull and M. Ruse (eds) The Philosophy of Biology. Oxford University Press.

  • Sober, E (2009). Philosophy of biology. New York: Westview Press.

  • Van’t Hoff et al. (2016). The industrial melanism mutation in British peppered moths is a transposable element. Nature 534: 102–105.

  • Waddington, C.H. (1957). The Strategy of the Genes. George Allen & Unwin.

  • Wagner, A., (2007). Robustness and Evolvability in Living Systems, Princeton University Press.

  • Wagner, A., (2011), The Origins of Evolutionary Innovations, Oxford University Press.

  • Wagner, A., (2015). Arrival of the Fittest, Oneworld Publications.

  • Wright, S. (1982), The shifting balance theory and macroevolution, Ann. Rev. Genet. 16:1–19.


Journal + Issues