Metaphysics, Function and the Engineering of Life: the Problem of Vitalism

Open access

Abstract

Vitalism was long viewed as the most grotesque view in biological theory: appeals to a mysterious life-force, Romantic insistence on the autonomy of life, or worse, a metaphysics of an entirely living universe. In the early twentieth century, attempts were made to present a revised, lighter version that was not weighted down by revisionary metaphysics: “organicism”. And mainstream philosophers of science criticized Driesch and Bergson’s “neovitalism” as a too-strong ontological commitment to the existence of certain entities or “forces”, over and above the system of causal relations studied by mechanistic science, rejecting the weaker form, organicism, as well. But there has been some significant scholarly “push-back” against this orthodox attitude, notably pointing to the 18th-century Montpellier vitalists to show that there are different historical forms of vitalism, including how they relate to mainstream scientific practice (Wolfe and Normandin, eds. 2013). Additionally, some trends in recent biology that run counter to genetic reductionism and the informational model of the gene present themselves as organicist (Gilbert and Sarkar 2000, Moreno and Mossio 2015). Here, we examine some cases of vitalism in the twentieth century and today, not just as a historical form but as a significant metaphysical and scientific model. We argue for vitalism’s conceptual originality without either reducing it to mainstream models of science or presenting it as an alternate model of science, by focusing on historical forms of vitalism, logical empiricist critiques thereof and the impact of synthetic biology on current (re-)theorizing of vitalism.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bachelard G. 1938/2004 La formation de l’esprit scientifique Paris: Vrin.

  • Bakhtin M. 1992 Contemporary Vitalism (1926) translation in F. Burwick & P. Douglass eds. The crisis in modernism. Bergson and the vitalist controversy 76–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bechtel W. & Richardson R.C. 1998 Vitalism. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy 639–643. London: Routledge.

  • Bedau M.A. 2010 An Aristotelian account of minimal chemical life. Astrobiology 10(10) 1011–1020.

  • Bernard C. 1878 Leçons sur les phénomènes de la vie communs aux végétaux et aux animaux Paris Baillière.

  • Von Bertalanffy L. 1933 Modern Theories of Development. An Introduction to Theoretical Biology trans. J.H. Woodger. London.

  • Berthelot M. 1860 Chimie organique fondée sur la synthèse. Paris: Mallet-Bachelier.

  • Berzelius J. 1845 Traité de chimie minérale végétale et animale. Édité par Friedrich Esslinger et Ferdinand Hoefer. 2nd French edition. Paris: Firmin-Didot frères.

  • Bichat X. 1800 Recherches physiologiques sur la vie et la mort. Paris: Béchet.

  • Blackburn S. 2003 Metaphysics In Nicholas Bunnin E. P. Tsui-James (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy Second Edition (1st edition 1996) 61–89. London: Blackwell.

  • Brooke J.H.1968 Wöhler’s Urea and its Vital Force – A Verdict from the Chemists. Ambix 15 84–114.

  • Bruylants G. Bartik K. Reisse J. 2010 Is it useful to have a clear-cut definition of life? on the use of fuzzy logic in prebiotic chemistry. Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres 40(2) 137–143.

  • Cleland C.E. 2012 Life without definitions Synthese 185(1) 125–144.

  • Cleland C.E. & Chyba C.F. 2002 Defining life Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere 32(4) 387–393.

  • Crick F.1966 Of Molecules and Men. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

  • Driesch H. 2012 Der Vitalismus als Geschichte und als Lehre (Leipzig 1905). Reprint Bremen.

  • Duchesneau F. Cimino G. eds. 1997 Vitalisms: from Haller to the cell theory. Firenze: Olschki.

  • Dupré J. 2012 Processes of life: essays in the philosophy of biology Oxford Oxford University Press.

  • Endy D. 2005 Foundations for engineering biology. Nature 438(7067) 449–453.

  • Feigl H. 1953 The scientific outlook: Naturalism and humanism (1949). In H. Feigl & M. Brodbeck (eds.) Readings in the philosophy of science 8–18. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts INC.

  • Feigl H. 1981 Some Crucial Issues of Mind-Body Monism (1971). In R. Cohen (ed.) Inquiries and Provocations 351–365. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

  • Foucault M. 1976 Les Mots et les choses. Paris: Gallimard.

  • Foucault M. 1991. Introduction in G. Canguilhem The Normal and the Pathological ed. Robert S. Cohen trans. Carolyn R. Fawcett 7–24. New York: Zone Books.

  • Frank P. 1941 The Law of Causality and Experience (1908). In Between Physics and Philosophy 17–28. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Frank P. 1949 Modern Science and its Philosophy. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Frank P. 1998 The Law of Causality and Its Limits (1932) (M. Neurath and R. Cohen trans. R. Cohen ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Gambarotto A. 2018 Vital Forces Teleology and Organization. Philosophy of Nature and the Rise of Biology in Germany. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Gayon J. 2004 De la biologie comme science historique. Sens public. http://www.sens-public.org/spip.php?article32.

  • Gayon J. 2008 De la biologie à la philosophie de la biologie In F. Monnoyeur (Ed.) Questions vitales: vie biologique vie psychique 83–95. Paris: Kimé.

  • Gayon J. 2010 Defining life: synthesis and conclusions. Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere 40(2) 231–244.

  • Gayon J. 2011 Defining life: philosophical or scientific issue? Leopoldina Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften (ms.)

  • Gayon J. 2013 Biologie de synthèse ou biotechnologie synthétique? Forum “La biologie de synthèse existe-t-elle?” CNAM April 25.

  • Gibson D.G. et al. 2010 Creation of a Bacterial Cell controlled by a synthesized genome. Science 329(5987) 52–56.

  • Gilbert S. and Sarkar S. 2000 Embracing complexity: organicism for the 21st century. Developmental Dynamics 219 1–9.

  • Gurwitsch A. 1915 On Practical Vitalism American Naturalist 49 763–770.

  • Hempel C. 1966 Philosophy of Natural Science Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall.

  • Hull D. 1981 Philosophy and biology. In G. Fløistad (ed.) Contemporary philosophy: a new survey 281–316. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

  • Jacob F. 1971 La logique du vivant : une histoire de l’hérédité Paris Gallimard.

  • Kirschner M. Gerhart J. Mitchison T. 2000 Molecular “vitalism” Cell 100 79–88.S.A.

  • Langton CG. 1989 “Artificial life” in CG. Langton (ed.) Artificial life I (Proceedings of the first conference on artificial life Los Alamos September 1987). Addison-Wesley Redwood City.

  • Lazebnik Y. 2002 Can a biologist fix a radio?—Or what I learned while studying apoptosis Cancer Cell 2 (3) 179–82.

  • Luisi P.L. 1998 About various definitions of life Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere 28(4–6) 613–622.

  • Machery E. 2012 Why I stopped worrying about the definition of life... and why you should as well Synthese 185(1) 145–164.

  • Marlière P. 2002. The farther the safer: a manifesto for securely navigating synthetic species away from the old living world Syst Synth Biol. 3(1–4) 77–84.

  • Mayr E.1988 Toward a new philosophy of biology: Observations of an evolutionist. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Ménuret de Chambaud J.J. 1765 “Observation(Gram. Physiq. Méd.)” in D. Diderot & J. le Rond D’Alembert (eds.) Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences des arts et des métiers XI 313–321. Paris: Briasson.

  • Morange M. 2003 La vie expliquée ? 50 ans après la double hélice Paris: Odile Jacob.

  • Morange M. 2010 The resurrection of life Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere 40(2) 179–182.

  • Moreno A. Mossio M. 2015 Biological autonomy. A Philosophical and theoretical enquiry. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Müller J. 1834 Handbuch der Physiologie des Menschen für Vorlesungen. Coblenz: Hölscher.

  • Nagel E. 1961 The structure of science. Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation London Routledge-Kegan Paul.

  • Ney A. 2008 Defining Physicalism Philosophy Compass 3(5) 1033–1048.

  • Normandin S. Wolfe. C.T. eds. 2013 Vitalism and the scientific image in the Post-Enlightenment Life science 1800–2010. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • O’Malley MA Powell A Davies JF and Calvert J 2008 Knowledge-making distinctions in synthetic biology BioEssays 30(1) 57–65.

  • Pascal B. 1964–1992 OEuvres complétes Texte établi présenté et annoté par Jean Mesnard édition du Tricentenaire Paris: Desclée de Brouwer Bibliothèque européenne.

  • Peterson E.L. 2010 Holism and Evolution in Biology and Anthropology: the Challenge of Gregory Bateson and C. H. Waddington to Biological Orthodoxy 1924–1980. PhD Dissertation University of Notre Dame Program in History and Philosophy of Science.

  • Peterson E.L. 2017 The Life Organic: The Theoretical Biology Club and the Roots of Epigenetics Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

  • Pleiss J. 2006 The promise of synthetic biology Applied microbiology and biotechnology 73(4) 735–739.

  • Ramberg P.J. 2000 The death of vitalism and the birth of organic chemistry: Wöhler’s urea synthesis and the disciplinary identity of organic chemistry. Ambix 47(3) 170–195.

  • Rasmussen S. Bedau M.A Chen L. Deamer D. Krakauer D.C. Packard N.H. Stadler P.F. 2009 Protocells Bridging Nonliving And Living Matter Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Richards R.J. 2000 Kant and Blumenbach on the Bildungstrieb: A Historical Misunderstanding. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 31(1) 11–32.

  • Ruiz-Mirazo K. Moreno A. 2013 Synthetic Biology: Challenging Life in order to grasp use or extend it Biological Theory 7(4) 376–382.

  • Schlick M. 1953 [1925] Philosophy of Organic Life in H. Feigl and M. Brodbeck (eds.) Readings in the Philosophy of Science 523–536. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

  • Smolke D.C. 2009 Building outside of the box: iGEM and the BioBricks Foundation. Nat. Biotechnol. 27 1099–1102.

  • Strawson P.F. 1959 Individuals. London: Methuen.

  • Tomic S. 2012 Les origines de la chimie organique au-delà du mythe fondateur Comptes Rendus Chimie 15(7) 553–568.

  • Varela F. 1979 Principles of biological autonomy. New York: Elsevier.

  • Waddington C. 1967 No vitalism for Crick Nature 216 202–203.

  • Watson J. 2004 The secret of life New York: Alfred A. Knopff.

  • Wolfe C.T. 2011 From substantival to functional vitalism and beyond: animas organisms and attitudes Eidos 14 212–235.

  • Wolfe C.T. 2014 Holism organicism and the risk of biochauvinism Verifiche 43(1–3) 41–60.

  • Wolfe C.T. 2015 Il fascino discreto del vitalismo settecentesco e le sue riproposizioni in P. Pecere ed. Il libro della natura vol. 1: Scienze e filosofia da Copernico a Darwin 273–299. Rome: Carocci.

  • Wolfe C.T. 2016 Materialism: A Historico-Philosophical Introduction Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Wolfe C.T. and Terada M. 2008 The animal economy as object and program in Montpellier Vitalism Science in Context 21(4) 537–579.

  • Wolfe C.T. & Wong A. 2014 The Return of Vitalism: Canguilhem Bergson and the Project of Biophilosophy. In G. Bianco M. de Beistegui & M. Gracieuse (eds.) The Care of Life: Transdisciplinary Perspectives in Bioethics and Biopolitics 63–75. Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield International.

  • Wong A. 2016 Critical Life: Bergson Canguilhem and the Critical Investigation of Life and the Living PhD Department of Philosophy Université de Liège.

  • Zammito J. 2012 The Lenoir Thesis Revisited: Blumenbach and Kant Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43(1) 120–32.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 881 405 36
PDF Downloads 392 204 22