The Nature of Fiction/al Utterances

  • 1 Professore Ordinario, University of Torino

Abstract

In this paper, first of all, I want to try a new defense of the utterance approach as to the relationship between fictional and nonfictional works on the one hand and between fictional and nonfictional utterances on the other hand, notably the idea that the distinction between fictional and nonfictional works is derivative on the distinction between fictional and nonfictional utterances of the sentences that constitute a text. Moreover, I want to account for the second distinction in minimally contextualist semantic terms. Finally, I want to hold that what makes a fictional utterance, hence a fictional work, properly fictional is the contextually pre-semantic fact that its utterer entertains an act of make-believe, where such an act is accounted for in metarepresentational terms. This ultimately means that the fiction/nonfiction distinction is not clarified in terms of the fictional works/nonfictional works distinction, for things rather go the other way around.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Currie, G., 1990, The Nature of Fiction. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

  • Currie, G., 2014, “Standing in the Last Ditch: On the Communicative Intentions of Fiction Makers”. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 72, 351–63.

  • Davies, D., 2007, Aesthetics and Literature. London, Continuum.

  • Davies, D., 2012, “Fictionality, Fictive Utterance, and the Assertive Author”. In G. Currie, P. Kotá’tko & M. Pokorný (eds.), Mimesis: Metaphysics, Cognition, Pragmatics. London, College Publications, 61–85.

  • Davies, D., 2015, “Fictive Utterance and the Fictionality of Narratives and Works”. British Journal of Aesthetics, 55, 39–55.

  • Deutsch, H., 2000, “Making Up Stories” In T. Hofweber & A. Everett (eds.), Empty Names, Fiction, and the Puzzles of Non-Existence. Stanford, CA, CSLI Publications, 17–36.

  • Deutsch, H., 2013, “Friend on Making Up Stories”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 113, 365–70.

  • Evans, G., 1982, The Varieties of Reference. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

  • Friend, S., 2008, “Imagining Fact and Fiction”. In K. Stock & K. Thomson-Jones (eds.), New Waves in Aesthetics. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 150–69.

  • Friend, S., 2011, “Fictive Utterance and Imagining”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 85, 163-80.

  • Friend, S., 2012, “Fiction as a Genre”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 112, 179–209.

  • Garcia-Carpintero, M., 2013, “Norms of Fiction-Making”. British Journal of Aesthetics, 53, 339–57.

  • Geertz, C., 1988, Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.

  • Gibson, J., 2007, Fiction and the Weave of Life. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

  • Kroon, F. & Voltolini, A., 2016, “Fiction”. In E.N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/fiction/

  • Lamarque, P. & Olsen, S.H., 1994, Truth, Fiction and Literature. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

  • Leslie, A. M., 1987, “Pretense and Representation: The Origins of ‘Theory of Mind’”. Psychological Review, 94. 412–26.

  • Lillard, A., 2002, “Just through the Looking Glass: Children’s Understanding of Pretence”. In: R.W. Mitchell (ed.), Pretending and Imagination in Animals and Children. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 102–14.

  • Meini, C. & Voltolini, A., 2010, “How Pretence Can Really Be Metarepresentational”. Mind and Society, 9, 31–58.

  • Nichols S. & Stich S., 2003, Mindreading. Oxford, Oxford University Press

  • Perner, J., 1991, Understanding the Representational Mind. Cambridge MA, The MIT Press.

  • Perry, J., 1997, “Indexicals and Demonstratives.” In R. Hale & C. Wright (eds.), Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford, Blackwel, 586–612.

  • Predelli, S., 2005, Contexts. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

  • Recanati, F., 2000, Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta. Cambridge MA, The MIT Press.

  • Reed, A.W., 2006, Reed Book of Maori Exploration. Auckland, Reed Books.

  • Sainsbury, R.M., 2009, Fiction and Fictionalism. London, Routledge.

  • Searle, J., 1975, “The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse”. New Literary History. 6, 319–32.

  • Stock, K., 2011, “Fictive Utterance and Imagining”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 85, 145–61.

  • Voltolini, A., 2006a, “Fiction as a Base of Interpretation Contexts”. Synthese, 153, 23–47.

  • Voltolini, A., 2006b, How Ficta Follow Fiction. A Syncretistic Account of Fictional Entities. Dordrecht, Springer.

  • Walton, K.L., 1970, “Categories of Art”. Philosophical Review, 79, 334–67.

  • Walton, K.L., 1978, “Fearing Fictions”. The Journal of Philosophy, 75, 5–25.

  • Walton, K.L., 1990, Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

  • Walton, K.L., 1993, “Metaphor and Prop Oriented Make Believe”. The European Journal of Philosophy, 1, 39–57.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search