Ortega y Gasset is known for his philosophy of life and his effort to propose an alternative to both realism and idealism. The goal of this article is to focus on an unfamiliar aspect of his thought. The focus will be given to Ortega’s interpretation of the advancements in modern mathematics in general and Cantor’s theory of transfinite numbers in particular. The main argument is that Ortega acknowledged the historical importance of the Cantor’s Set Theory, analyzed it and articulated a response to it. In his writings he referred many times to the advancements in modern mathematics and argued that mathematics should be based on the intuition of counting. In response to Cantor’s mathematics Ortega presented what he defined as an ‘absolute positivism’. In this theory he did not mean to naturalize cognition or to follow the guidelines of the Comte’s positivism, on the contrary. His aim was to present an alternative to Cantor’s mathematics by claiming that mathematicians are allowed to deal only with objects that are immediately present and observable to intuition. Ortega argued that the infinite set cannot be present to the intuition and therefore there is no use to differentiate between cardinals of different infinite sets.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Beck M. and Geoghegan R. 2011 The Art of Proof. Basic Training for Deeper Mathematics New York Springer.
Cantor G. 2015 “Contributions to the Founding of the Theory of Transfinite Numbers in Contributions to the Founding of the Theory of Transfinite Numbers. Translated by Philip E.B. Jourdain Dover Publications New York.
Dauben J.W. 1989 Georg Cantor: His Mathematics and Philosophy of the Infinite Princeton University Press New Jersey.
Einstein A. 2007 ‘Geometry and Experience’ An expanded form of Address to the Prussian Academy of Sciences in Berlin of January 27th 1921. In: The Essential Einstein. His Greatest Works. Edited with commentary by Stephen Hawking (Penguin Books)
Harold E. 1988 Kronecker’s Place in History. In: “History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics” W. Aspray and P. Kitcher eds. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science vol. 11 Univ. of Minn. Press.