Human Reliability Using the Fault Tree Analysis. A Case Study of a Military Accident Investigation

Open access

Abstract

The work integrates the human error term in the broader concept of human performance analysis. The main issues associated with human error and human reliability are highlighted step by step, resulting from the review of literature, from the perspective of the relationship between risk and safety. To assess the risks arising from human error and to reduce vulnerability of work, methods derived from the probabilistic assessment of the work safety systems are used. To identify the risks caused by the human error, the authors propose the Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) method. The paper reveals the way the method is used for identifying the critical subsystems for the functioning of a given system and analyzes how unwanted events and their causes arise and occur. Also, a case study that is investigated throuhg the FTA method and that consists in the analysis of an accident that occurred in Evangelos Florakis naval logistics base from Cyprus, is presented.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Singleton W. T. Theoretical Approaches to Human Error. The Society’s Lecture 1973 Given at Loughborough on 29th March 1973 Ergonomics16(6) 727-737 1973.

  • [2] Ridley J. & Channing J. (Eds.). Safety at work. Routledge 2008.

  • [3] Pheasant S. Ergonomics Work and Health. Macmillan Press Basingstoke 1991.

  • [4] Reason J. Human error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1990.

  • [5] Sanders M.S. McCormick E.J. Human factors in engineering and design. McGraw-Hill Book Company 1987.

  • [6] Wickens C.D. Lee J.D. Liu Y. & Gordon-Becker S. Introduction to human factors engineering. Pearson Prentice Hall 1998.

  • [7] Taylor D.H. The hermeneutics of accidents and safety. In: Rasmussen J. Duncan K. LePlat J. (Eds.) New Technology and Human Error. Wiley New York NY 1987.

  • [8] Poucet A. Survey of methods used to assess human reliability in the human factors reliability benchmark exercise. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 22(1) 257-268.

  • [9] Kirwan B. A guide to practical human reliability assessment. Taylor & Francis 1994.

  • [10] Nicolae F. Risk management. Concepts. Methods. Applications (in Romanian: Managementul riscului. Concepte. Metode. Aplicații) Mircea cel Bătrân Naval Academy Press Constanța 2015.

  • [11] Swain A. D. Comparative evaluation methods for human reliability analysis (GRS-71). Köln Germany: Gessellschaft für Reaktorsicherheit 1989.

  • [12] Dougherty E. M. Jr. Human reliability analysis – Where shouldst thou turn? Reliability Engineering and System Safety 29 3 pp. 283-299 1990.

Search
Journal information
Target audience: researchers in the fields of political and financial law
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 730 432 19
PDF Downloads 323 205 9