Assessment of two loss methods for estimation of surface runoff in Zaafrania urban catchment, North-East of Algeria

Open access


Surface runoff is a major problem in urban catchments; its generation is always related to the amount of effective rainfall dropped over the surface, however in urban catchments the process is considerably altered by the emergence of impervious areas. In this study the Soil Consevation Service – curve number (SCS-CN) and the Green–Ampt loss methods were used in rainfall-runoff modelling in the Zaafrania urban catchment which is located in Annaba city in the north east of Algeria. The two loss methods were carried out within Hydrologic Engineering Center – Hydrologic Modelling System (HEC-HMS), the choice of the appropriate method for simulating runoff hydrographs in the study area was made by comparing the simulated hydrographs versus observed data using visual inspection and statistical analysis. The results indicate that SCS-CN loss method fit better in the case of 100 years return period NSE (0.462) than in 10 years NSE (0.346) and the results of calibration of Green–Ampt loss method for the 100 years return period NSE (0.417) provide best fit than the case of 10 years NSE (0.381). Furthermore, the results of both return periods (10 and 100 years) of SCS-CN loss method provide best fit than the results of return periods (10 and 100 years) of Green–Ampt loss method. It could be concluded that SCS-CN method is preferred to the Green–Ampt method for event based rainfall-runoff modelling.

Ali M., Khan S.J., Aslam I., Khan Z. 2011. Simulation of the impacts of land-use change on surface runoff of Lai Nullah Basin in Islamabad, Pakistan. Landscape Urban Plan. Vol. 102. Iss. 4 p. 271–279.

Azam M., Kim H.S., Maen J.S. 2017. Development of flood alert application in Mushim stream watershed Korea. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. Vol. 21 p. 11–26.

Bansode A., Patil K.A. 2014. Estimation of runoff by using SCS curve number method and arc GIS. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research. Vol. 5. Iss. 7 p. 1283–1287.

Bhura C.S., Singh N. P., Mori P.R., Prakash I. 2015. Estimation of surface runoff for Ahmedabad urban area using SCS-CN method and GIS, IJSTE. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research. Vol. 1. Iss. 11 p. 2349–2784.

Chu S.T. 1978. Infiltration during unsteady rain. Water Resources Research. Vol. 14. Iss. 3 p. 461–466.

Du J., Qian L., Rui H., Zuo T., Zheng D., Xu Y., Ch Y. 2012. Assessing the effects of urbanization on annual runoff and flood events using an integrated hydrological modeling system for Qinhuai River basin, China. Journal of Hydrology. Vol. 464–465 p. 127–139.

Hafezparast M., Araghinejad S., Ehsan Fatemi S., Bressers H. 2013. A conceptual rainfall-runoff model using the auto calibrated NAM models in the Sarisoo River. Hydrology: Current Research. Vol. 4. Iss. 148 pp. 6. DOI 10.4172/2157-7587.1000148.

Laouacheria F., Mansouri R. 2015. Comparison of WBNM and HEC-HMS for runoff hydrograph prediction in a small urban catchment. Water Resources Management. Vol. 29 p. 2485–2501. DOI 10.1007/s11269-015-0953-7.

Lee S.B., Yoon C.G., Jung K.W., Hwang H.S. 2010. Comparative evaluation of runoff and water quality using HSPF and SWMM. Water Science and Technology. Vol. 62. Iss. 6 p. 1401–1409.

Li J., Liu C., Wang Z., Liang K. 2015. Two universal runoff yield models: SCS vs. LCM. Journal of Geographical Sciences. Vol. 25. Iss. 3 p. 311–318. DOI 10.1007/s11442-015-1170-2.

Mokhtari E.H., Remini B., Hamoudi S.A. 2016. Modelling of the rain–flow by hydrological modelling software system HEC-HMS – watershed’s case of wadi Cheliff Ghrib, Algeria. Journal of Water and Land Development. No. 30 p. 87–100. DOI 10.1515/jwld-2016-0025.

Nearing M.A., Liu B.Y., Risse L.M., Zhang X. 1996. Curve numbers and Green–Ampt effective hydraulic conductivities. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. Vol. 32. No. 1 p. 125–136. DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1996.tb03440.x.

NRCS 2008. National engineering handbook. Part 630. Hydrology. Washington D.C. USDA.

Radecki-Pawlik A., Wałęga A., Wojkowski J., Pijanowski J. 2014. Runoff formation in terms of changes in land use – Mściwojów water reservoir area. Journal of Water and Land Development. No. 23 p. 3–10. DOI 10.1515/jwld-2014-0024.

Rossman L.A. 2009. Storm water management model user’s manual version 5.0. EPA/600/R-05/040. Cincinnati, Ohio. National Risk Management Research Laboratory. USEPA.

Saghafian B., Farazjoo H., Bozorgy B., Yazdandoost F. 2008. Flood intensification due to changes in land use. Water Resources Management. Vol. 22 p. 1051–1067.

Skhakhfa I.D., Ouerdachi L. 2016. Hydrological modelling of wadi Ressoul watershed, Algeria, by HEC-HMS model. Journal of Water and Land Development. No. 31 p. 139–147. DOI 10.1515/jwld-2016-0045.

Wilcox B.P., Rawls W.J., Brakensiek D.L., Wight J.R. 1990. Predicting runoff from Rangeland catchments: A comparison of two models. Water Resources Research. Vol. 26. No. 10 p. 2401–2410.

Zope P.E., Eldho T.I., Jothiprakash V. 2015. Impacts of urbanization on flooding of coastal urban catchment: A case study of Mumbai City, India. Natural Hazards. Vol. 75 p. 887–908.

Journal of Water and Land Development

The Journal of Polish Academy of Sciences Committee on Agronomic Sciences, Section of Land Reclamation and Environmental Engineering in Agriculture and Institute of Technology and Life Sciences in Falenty

Journal Information

CiteScore 2018: 1.55

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.401
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.389

Ministry of Science and Higher Education: 14 points


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 467 147 18
PDF Downloads 213 184 35