Analytical strategy for determination of chloramphenicol in different biological matrices by liquid chromatography - mass spectrometry

Open access


Introduction: The main problem in determination of chloramphenicol in food of animal origin is a large number of matrices. The main target of this study was to create a method for determination and confirmation of chloramphenicol in products and food of animal origin. Material and Methods: Each 5 g matrix sample was mixed with 5 mL of water and 10 mL of acetonitrile/ethyl acetate, homogenised, and centrifuged. The organic layer was evaporated and redissolved in 6 mL of 4% NaCl. The extract was cleaned up by SPE technique. Chloramphenicol was analysed by LC-MS/MS in electrospray mode. Results: The procedure was validated according to the Commission Decision No. 2002/657/EC. The apparent recoveries were in the range of 92.1% to 107.1% with a repeatability less than 11.0% (4.4%-11.0%) and within-laboratory reproducibility below 13.6% (4.7%-13.6%). Conclusion: The method was successfully validated and proved to be efficient, precise, and useful for quantification of chloramphenicol in more than 20 different matrices.


  • 1. Berendsen B.J., Zuidema T., de Jong J., Stolker L.A., Nielen M.W.: Discrimination of eight chloramphenicol isomers by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in order to investigate the natural occurrence of chloramphenicol. Anal Chim Acta 2011, 700, 78-85.

  • 2. Commission Decision 2002/657/EC of 12 August 2002 implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results. OJ L 221, 17.8.2002, 8-36.

  • 3. Guy P.A., Royer D., Mottier P., Gremaud E., Perisset A., Stadler R.H.: Quantitative determination of chloramphenicol in milk powders by isotope dilution liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 2004, 1054, 365-371.

  • 4. Kittler K., Radeck W., Polzer J.: Investigations on the influence of hydrolysis on the total amount of marker residue and consequences. Conference Material, EuroResidue VIII, in Egmond aan Zee, the Netherlands 2016. pp. 129-131.

  • 5. Nicolich R.S., Werneck-Barroso E., Marques M.A.S.: Food safety evaluation: Detection and confirmation of chloramphenicol in milk by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 2006, 565, 97-102.

  • 6. RASFF - the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed.

  • 7. Rejtharová M., Rejthar L.: Determination of chloramphenicol in urine, feed water, milk, and honey samples using molecular imprinted polymer clean-up. J Chromatogr A 2009, 1216, 8246-8253.

  • 8. Rezende D.R., Filho N.F., Rocha G.L. Simultaneous determination of chloramphenicol and florfenicol in liquid milk, milk powder, and bovine muscles by LC-MS/MS. Food Addit Contam A 2012, 29, 559-570.

  • 9. Rocha Siqueira S.R., Luiz Donato J., de Nucci G., Reyes, F.G.R.: A high-throughput method for determining chloramphenicol residues in poultry, egg, shrimp, fish, swine, and bovine using LC-ESI-MS/MS. J Sep Sci 2009, 32, 4012-4019.

  • 10. Rønning H.T., Einarsen K., Asp T.N.: Determination of chloramphenicol residues in meat, seafood, egg, honey, milk, plasma, and urine with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and the validation of the method based on 2002/657/EC. J Chromatogr A 2006, 1118, 226-233.

  • 11. Shen J., Xia X., Jiang H., Li C., Li J., Li X., Ding S.: Determination of chloramphenicol, thiamphenicol, florfenicol, and florfenicol amine in poultry andporcine muscle and liver by gas chromatography-negative chemical ionization mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2009, 877, 1523-1529.

  • 12. Sniegocki T., Posyniak A., Gbylik-Sikorska M., Zmudzki J.: Determination of chloramphenicol in milk using a QuEChERSbased on liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry Method Anal Letters 2014, 47, 568-578.

  • 13. Sniegocki T., Posyniak A., Zmudzki J.: Determination of chloramphenicol residues in milk by gas and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry methods. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2007, 51, 59-64.

  • 14. Sniegocki T., Gbylik-Sikorska M., Posyniak A.: Transfer of chloramphenicol from milk to commercial dairy products - experimental proof. Food Control 2015, 57, 411-418.

  • 15. Tajik H., Malekinejad H., Razavi-Rouhani S.M., Pajouhi M.R., Mahmoudi R., Haghnazari A.: Chloramphenicol residues in chicken liver, kidney and muscle: a comparison among the antibacterial residues monitoring methods of Four Plate Test, ELISA and HPLC. Food Chem Toxicol 2010, 48, 2464-2468.

  • 16. Vivekanandan K., Swamy M. G., Prasad S., Mukherjee R.: A simple method of isolation of chloramphenicol in honey and its estimation by liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2005, 19, 3025-3030.

Journal of Veterinary Research

formerly Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2016: 0.462

CiteScore 2016: 0.46

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.230
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.383


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 51 51 38
PDF Downloads 12 12 8