Previous studies have analysed the need to measure learners’ readiness for online learning. In the framework of education reform in Latvia, by the end of 2021 the National Centre for Education will implement online courses for all school teachers. However, there is a lack of studies investigating teachers-as-learners’ readiness to study online in Latvia. The aim of the study was to assess Latvian teachers’ readiness to study online with focus on the differences of respondents’ socio-demographic or professional characteristics. 1092 teachers from 100 schools filled in the self-evaluation survey form online. Statistically significant differences were found in all subscales of the survey. Differences in digital skills and in readiness to study online were found at all education levels by respondents’ gender, age group or place of living. Younger respondents, males or city inhabitants showed higher rates. E-learning course should be customized, taking into account learners’ socio-demographic parameters and online learning readiness rate.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Beetham, H. (2013). Designing for active learning in technology-rich contexts. In Beet-ham, H. & Sharpe, R. (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age (2nd edition) (pp. 94–157). New York, USA: Taylor & Francis.
Broos, A. (2005). Gender and information and communication technologies (ICT) anxiety: Male self-assurance and female hesitation. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(1), 21–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2005.8.21
Catalano, A. J. (2018). Measurements in distance education: A compendium of instruments, scales, and measures for evaluating online learning. New York: Routledge.
Coopasami, M., Knight, S., & Pete, M. (2017). e-Learning readiness amongst nursing students at the Durban University of Technology. Health SA Gesondheid, 22, 300–306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hsag.2017.04.003
Franzenburg, G. (2017). Learning from the past for the future: How to make adult education sustainable. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(2), 57–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/dcse-2017-0015
Gorbunovs, A., Kapenieks, A., & Cakula, S. (2016). Self-discipline as a key indicator to improve learning outcomes in e-learning environment. Procedia – social and behavioral sciences, 231 (International Conference. Meaning in Translation: Illusion of Precision, MTIP2016, 11–13 May 2016, Riga, Latvia), 256–262. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.100
Hobbs, R., & Coiro, J. (2019). Design features of a professional development program in digital literacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 62(4), 401–409. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.907
Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayes, T., & de Freitas, S. (2013). Technology-enhanced learning. In Beetham, H. & Sharpe, R. (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age (2nd edition) (p. 324). New York, USA: Taylor & Francis. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203961681
Park, J.-H., Lee, E., & Bae, S. H. (2010). Factors influencing learning achievement of nursing students in e-learning. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 40(2), 182–190. doi: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2010.40.2.182
Piskurich, G. M. (2003). Preparing learners for e-learning. (R. Taff, Ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Salīte, I. (2009). Educational action research for sustainability: Constructing a vision for the future in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 10(1), 5–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10099-009-0021-6
Salīte, I., Drelinga, E., Iliško, Dz., Oļehnoviča, E., & Zariņa, S. (2018). Sustainability from the transdisciplinary perspective: An action research strategy for continuing education program development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(2), 135–152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2016-0020
Tsai, H.-Y. S., Shillair, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2017). Social support and “playing around”: An examination of how older adults acquire digital literacy with tablet computers. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 36(1), 29–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464815609440
Wladis, C., & Samuels, J. (2016). Do online readiness surveys do what they claim? Validity, reliability, and subsequent student enrollment decisions. Computers & Education, 98, 39–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2016.03.001