Trust in the Acquisition of Life Experience of Children Left without Parental Care

Open access


The children’s trust determines the relationship between various nuanced emotions and the general attitude towards themselves and the world. Children left without parental care are already subjected to negative experience from childhood, which creates a basic mistrust in people and the world. They have experienced psychological trauma, and often not only one. The authors consider this issue to be topical since children who are left without parental care lose their foundation of trust, and they do not develop productive relationships with their fellow human beings and are unhappy because these children have lost confidence during their life experience. Children who are left without parental care often have to change their living conditions from crisis centres and boarding schools to orphanages and, at best, they are immediately placed in a foster home. These children live in fear because experience shows that they often have to separate from the person they trusted, which has a persistent impact on the child in the process of acquiring a sustainable life experience. Trust builds on the quality of past life experience, relationships with relatives, other adults, friends, foster family, and other stakeholders. Trust is very important. It is very difficult to create deep trust, but very easy to break its fundamental basis. For children who are left without parental care, trust means the belief that the world and people are predominantly good, and the belief that they are good for this world. For the action research, the authors chose a target sample of respondents that interacted with the research, action, and evaluation and comparison of the results obtained in order to find out how the phenomena of trust affected the acquisition of future life experience by children left without parental care.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Akadēmiskā terminu datubāze AkadTerm. (2018). [Academic terminology database AkadTerm]. Available:

  • Bērna aizgādības tiesību pārtraukšana atņemšana un atjaunošana. (01.01.2007). [Suspension withdrawal and renewal of custody of a child]. Published: Latvijas Vēstnesis 107 (3475) LR Saeimas un MK Ziņotājs.

  • Bērnu tiesību aizsardzības likums. (22.07.1998). [Child rights protection law]. Published: Latvijas Vēstnesis 199/200 (1260/1261) LR Saeimas un MK Ziņotājs.

  • Fedosejeva J. Boče A. Romanova M. Iliško Dz. & Ivanova O. (2018). Education for sustainable development: The choice of pedagogical approaches and methods for the implementation of pedagogical tasks in the Anthropocene age. Journal of Teacher Educational for Sustainability20(1) 157–179.

  • Gmeiners H. (2002). Founding the first SOS Children’s Village. The umbrella organisation of SOS Children’s Villages. Available:

  • Hardin R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

  • Kapenieks J. (2016). Educational action research to achieve the essential competencies of the future. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability18(1) 95–110.

  • Korčaks J. (1989). Kā mīlēt bērnu? [How to love a child?] Rīga: Zvaigzne.

  • Latvian Oxford Living Dictionaries. (2019). Available: Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Lewowicki T. & Korczak J. (1994). Prospects: the quarterly review of comparative education (Paris UNESCO: International Bureau of Education) vol. XXIV no. 1/2 1994 p. 37–48.

  • Mārtinsone K. & Pipere A. (red.). (2011). Ievads pētniecībā. Stratēģijas dizaini metodes. [Introduction into research. Strategies designs methods]. Rīga: Raka.

  • Millett D. (2015). Anthropocene: The age of man. North Charleston: A DBA or On-Demand Publishing LLC.

  • Ricci C. & Pritscher C. P. (2015). Holistic pedagogy: The self and quality willed learning. Springer.

  • Salīte I. (1998). An ecocentric paradigm: An important tool for teachers of environmental education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education14 81–85.

  • Salīte I. (2015). Searching for sustainability in teacher education and educational research: experiences from the Baltic and Black Sea Circle Consortium for educational research. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education6 21–29.

  • Salīte I. Drelinga E. Iliško Dz. Oļehnoviča E. & Zariņa S. (2016). Sustainability from the transdisciplinary perspective: An action research strategy for continuing Education Program Development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability18(2) 135–152.

  • Sociālo pakalpojumu un sociālās palīdzības likums. (01.01.2003). [Social services and social assistance law]. Published: Latvijas Vēstnesis 168 (2743) LR Saeimas un MK Ziņotājs.

  • Solomon R. C. & Flores F. (2001). Building trust: In business politics relationships and life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Špona A. & Čehlova Z. (2004). Pētniecība pedagoģijā. [Research in pedagogy]. Rīga: Raka.

  • Šwitala E. (2015). Teachers’ values related to sustainable development in Polish and Latvian secondary schools. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education6 127–131.

  • Thagard P. (2019). Mind-society: From brains to social sciences and professions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Valsts bērnu tiesību aizsardzības inspekcija. Kas ir audžuģimene? [The State Inspectorate for protection of children’s rights. What is a foster family?] Available:

  • Zuev V. (2002). The problem of reality in biological taxonomy. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk University Publisher.

  • Изард К. Э. (2011). Психология эмоций. [Psychology of emotions]. СПб.: Питер.

  • Ледлофф Ж. (2003). Как вырастить ребенка счастливым. Принцип преемственности. [How to raise a child happy. The principle of continuity]. Москва: Генезис.

  • Маслоу А. (2011). Мотивация и личность. [Motivation and personality]. СПб.: Питер.

  • Осорина М. В. (2010). Секретный мир детей в пространстве мира взрослых. 5-е изд. [The secret world of children in the space of adults’ world]. (5th Ed.). СПб.: Питер.

  • Розов М. А. (2012). Философия науки в новом виденни. [The new picture of philosophy]. Москва: Новый хронограф. Available at

  • Розов M. A. (2006). Теория социальных эстафет и проблемы эпистемологии. [The theory of social relay race and the problems of epistemology]. Смоленск: Смоленский государственный педагогический университет.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 1.65

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.255
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.496

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 71 71 18
PDF Downloads 56 56 20