Detecting a Sustainable Mindset through Using Content Analysis of Teacher-produced Learning Journals

Anne E. M. Fox 1 , Sandra Iriste 2 , and Petra Bezeljak 3
  • 1 Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), , Trondheim, Norway
  • 2 Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, , Jelgava, Latvia
  • 3 University College for Agrarian and Environmental Pedagogy, , Vienna, Austria


Having developed and piloted a professional development blended learning course for teachers of home economics with the purpose of promoting a sustainable mindset in their students, we used the written learning journals by the teachers during the 15-week course to detect various aspects of a sustainable mindset, which could be attributed to the course. We assumed that the learning journals of 19 participants might reveal reflections on sustainability, the pedagogy of sustainability, a positive association between sustainability and the pedagogy of sustainability, and the development of a sustainable mindset over the period of the course. The analysis confirmed that the participants reflected a great deal on learning and sustainability as the course progressed; revealing that a positive link between teaching practice and sustainability can be observed. However, the analysis also indicated some important concepts that might have been under-emphasised in the course.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bashan, B., & Holsblat, R. (2017). Reflective journals as a research tool: The case of student teachers’ development of teamwork. Cogent Education, 4, 1–15.

  • Butcher, R., & Eldridge, J. (1990). The use of diaries in data collection. The Statistician, 39(1), 25–41.

  • Coll, S. D., & Coll, R. K. (2018). Using blended learning and out-of-school visits: Pedagogies for effective science teaching in the twenty-first century. Research in Science and Technological Education, 36(2), 185–204.

  • Forstner-Ebhart, A., & Linder, W. (2017). Grüne Pädagogik – Lernen am Widerspruch [Green Pedagogy – Learning through Contradiction]. Open Online Journal for Research and Education. Research Day, April 2017. [online] Available at

  • Fuertes-Camacho, M. T., Graell-Martin, M., Fuentes-Loss, M., & Balaguer-Fabregas, M. (2019). Integrating sustainability into higher education curricula through the project method, a global learning strategy. Sustainability, 11(3), 1–25.

  • Holt, D. B. (2012). Constructing sustainable consumption: From ethical values to the cultural transformation of unsustainable markets. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 236–255.

  • Ikerd, J., Gamble, L., & Cox, T. (2014). Deep sustainability: The essentials. [online] Available at

  • Khazaeenezhad, B., Tavakoli, M., & Amirian, Z. (2018). Making sense of core qualities to sustain professional development through core reflection practice. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 93–105.

  • Lambrechts, W., Mula, I., Ceulemans, K., Molderez, I., & Gaeremynck, V. (2013). The integration of competences for sustainable development in higher education: An analysis of bachelor programs in management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 65–73.

  • Letch, N. (2012). Using reflective journals to engage students in learning business process management concepts. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 4(4), 435–454.

  • Leximancer software. Available at

  • Ploum, L., Blok, V., Lans, T., & Omta, O. (2018). Toward a validated competence framework for sustainable entrepreneurship. Organization and Environment, 31(2), 113–132.

  • ProfESus Erasmus+ project. Link to curriculum

  • Rauch, F., & Steiner, R. (2013). Competences for education for sustainable development in teacher education. CEPS Journal, 3(1), 9–24.

  • Sotiriadou, P., Brouwers, J., & Le, T. (2014). Choosing a qualitative data analysis tool: A comparison of NVivo and Leximancer. Annals of Leisure Research, 17(2), 218–234.

  • Starchan, G. (2009). System thinking: The ability to recognise and analyse the interconnections within and between systems. In A. Stibbe (Ed.), The handbook of sustainability literacy (pp. 84–88). Dartington: Green Books.

  • Sterling, S. (2004). Higher education, sustainability, and the role of systemic learning. In P. B. Corcoran & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), Higher education and the challenge of sustainability (pp. 49–70). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education: Re-visioning learning and change. Dartington: Schumacher Society, Green Books.

  • Sterling, S. (2012). The Future fit framework: An introductory guide to teaching and learning for sustainability. Plymouth: Higher Education Academy.

  • UCAEP. (2018). Green pedagogy: From theoretical basics to practical sustainable learning activities. Vienna: Vizerektorat für Umweltpädagogik, Weiterbildung und Forschung.

  • UNECE. (2011). The competences in education for sustainable development (learning for the future: competences in education for sustainable development). (2011, 7 April). [online] Available at

  • Wallin, P., & Adawi, T. (2018). The reflective diary as a method for the formative assessment of self-regulated learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(4), 507–521.

  • Wogowitsch, C. (2013). Methoden für kreative Lernprozesse [Methods for creative learning processes]. In C. Wogowitsch (Hrsg.), Grüne Pädagogik – vom Theoriefundament bis zu professionsorientierten Lernarrangements [Green Pedagogy – From theoretical foundations to professional learning practices] (pp. 44–50). Wien: Hochschule für Agrar- und Umweltpädagogik.


Journal + Issues