Assessing Teacher Competence and Its Follow-up to Support Professional Development Sustainability

Open access


Teacher assessment has been recently considered as a minor issue in Education. Therefore, there is lacks teacher’s competency assessment as the basis for the sustainability of teacher profession development. This study was on attempt to describe the model of teacher assessment which had been implemented in Indonesia and its challenges to encourage the development of a sustainable teacher profession. The data was collected through documentation. Moreover, some interviews were conducted about (1) teacher competency test in 2012–2014 by 1,611,251 teachers; in 2015 by 2,699,516 teachers, and in 2016 by 427,189 teachers, and (2) teacher development programs as a follow-up of teacher competency tests. The obtained data was analized by descriptive quantitative and qualitative, respectively, on the document study result data and the interviews. The teacher competency test results were used to measure the mastery of pedagogic and professional competence of teachers at all subject matter and all levels of schools in Indonesia. Furthermore, the results are used as the basis for determining teacher quality improvement program in Indonesia continuous training. They are expected to provide best practice information from the implementation of teacher competency mapping done in Indonesia including its follow-up in order to develop the teacher’s sustainable profession.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Acquah P. C. Frimpong E. B. & Borkloe J. K. (2017). The Competency Based Training (CBT) concept of teaching and learning in the Technical Universities in Ghana: Challenges and the Way Forward. Asia Pacific Journal of Contemporary Education and Communcation Technology3(2) 172–182.

  • Anthony G. & Walshaw M. 2009. Characteristics of Effective Teaching of Mathematics: A View from the West. Journal of Mathematics Education2(2) 47–164.

  • Baumert J. & Kunter M. (2006). The COACTIV model of teachers’ professional competence. Jerman: Center for Educational Research Max Planck Institute for Human Development.

  • Bell D. (2016). Twenty first century education: transformative education for sustainability and responsible citizenship. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability 18(1) 48–56.

  • Briede L. (2016). The relationship between mathematics teachersķ teaching approaches and 9th grade students’ mathematics Self. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability18(1) 34–47.

  • Brine A. (2005). Continuing Professional Development: A guide for information professionals. Great Britain: Chandos Publishing.

  • Carreker S. & Boulware R. (2015). The personal competencies through the eyes of the classroom teacher. Center on Innovations in Learning Temple University Philadelphia PA.

  • Darling L. & Hammond. (2010). Evaluating teacher effectiveness: how teacher performance assessments can measure and improve teaching. Washington: Center for American Progress.

  • Directorate of Teachers and Education Personnel. (2015). Technical guidance on improving the competence of the learner teachers. Jakarta.

  • Directorate of Teachers and Education Personnel. (2015). The Strategic Plan of the Directorate of Teachers and Education Personnel 2015–2019. Jakarta.

  • Directorate of Teachers and Education Personnel. (2016). Guidelines for teachers training by face-to-face (offline) online and combination mode. Jakarta.

  • Donaldson G. et al. (2013). Teaching profession for the 21st century. Belgrade: Centre for Education Policy Svetozara Markovica 22/20.

  • Goldstein I. L. & Ford J. K. (2002). Training in organizations: need assessment development and evaluation. Belmont: Wadswoorth Group.

  • Hasanah D. S. (2010). Pengaruh pendidikan latihan (diklat) kepemimpinan guru dan iklim kerja terhadap kinerja guru sekolah dasar se-Kecamatan Babakancikao Kabupaten Purwakarta. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan 11(2) 85–96.

  • Hattie J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence?. Paper was presented in Australian Courcil for Educational Research Annual Conference on Building Teacher Quality in University of Auckland.

  • Hospesová & Tichá M. (2000). Developing mathematics teacher’s competence. Research report supported by the Socrates Comenius project 87636-CP-1-2000-1-CZComenius-C31 and GACR 406/02/0829 and 406/05/2444.

  • Iswari O. M. (2009). Membina perkembangan emosi remaja meningkatkan profesional guru. PEDAGOGY: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan 9(1) 101–112.

  • Kabadayi A. I. (2016). A suggested in-service training model based on turkish preschool teachersķ conceptions for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability 18(1) 5–15.

  • Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2015). Pedoman pelaksanaan uji kompetensi. Jakarta: Direktorat Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan.

  • Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2016. Buku 1 pembinaan dan pengembangan profesi guru. Jakarta: Direktorat Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan.

  • Kunartinah & Sukoco F. (2010). Pengaruh pendidikan dan pelatihan pembelajaran organisasi terhadap kinerja dengan kompetensi sebagai mediasi. Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi (JBE) 17(1) 74–84.

  • Makrakis V. Kostoulas N. & Makrakis. (2012). Course curricular design and development of the M. SC. programme in the field of ICT in education for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability 14(2) 5–40.

  • Ministry of Education and Culture. (2015). Guidelines for the implementation of the competency test. Jakarta: Directorate of Teachers and Education Personnel.

  • Ministry of Education and Culture. 2016. Book 1 Continuous professional development of teachers. Jakarta: Directorate of Teachers and Education Personnel.

  • Mulyasa. (2007). Standar kompetensi dan sertifikasi guru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

  • Mulyasa. (2013). Uji kompetensi guru dan penilaian kinerja guru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

  • OECD. (2009). Teacher evaluation: a conceptual framework and examples of country practices. Paper was prepared for presentation at the OECD-Mexico Workshop Towards a Teacher Evaluation Framework in Mexico: International Practices Criteria and Mechanisms Mexico City.

  • Okeke C. I. & Mtyuda P. N. (2017). Teacher job dissatisfaction: implications for teacher sustainability and social transformation. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability 19(1) 54–68.

  • Prasetyo T. I. & Gintoro. (2010). Pengembangan model pelatihan online berbasis web untuk keunggulan bersaing pada PT Intellisys Tripratama. Jurnal CommIT 4(2) 109–119.

  • Redding S. (2014). Personal Competencies in Personalized Learning. Center on Innovations in Learning Temple University.

  • Roelofs E. & Sanders P. (2007). Towards a framework for assessing teacher competence. European journal of vocational training 40(1) 123–139.

  • Silberman M. (2006). Active learning: a handbook of techniques designs case examples and tips. San Francisco: Pleiffer.

  • Vathanophas V. (2007). Competency requirements for effective job performance in Thai public sector. Contemporary management research3(1) 45.

  • Vermunt J. D. & Verloop N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and instruction9(3) 257–280.

  • Wen Y. & Wu J. (2015). A study on Singapore Chinese language teachers’ professional proficiency and training needs for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability 19(2) 69–89.

  • Wilkerson J. R. & Lang W. S. (2007). Assessing teacher competency: five standards-based steps to valid measurement using the CAATS model. United States: Corwin Press.

  • Zineb et al. (2017). The application of the competency-based approach to assess the training and employment adequacy problem. International Journal of Education (IJE) 5(1) 1–18.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 1.65

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.255
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.496

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 929 714 50
PDF Downloads 713 506 50