An Exploration of Teaching Practices of Private, Public, and Public-Private EFL Teachers in Iran

Open access


This study investigates the practices of public (high) school, private language institute, and public-private teachers. In particular, it aims at addressing the role of contextual factors, the variations teachers introduce to cope with them, and the degree of sustainable behaviour among these three groups of teachers. High school teachers consisted of those who taught only in high schools and the ones teaching both in high schools and private language institutes. For this purpose, classroom practices of 60 EFL teachers (N=20 per group) with 3 to 6 years of teaching experience and BA degree in TEF) were compared in terms of group/pair work, teacher talking time, L1 use, questioning, corrective feedback, and coverage of language skills. The findings of the study indicate that a significant difference exists among these three groups of teachers in terms of their practices. It is noteworthy that in the same teaching context of high school, the practices of teachers with and without private language teaching experience are significantly dissimilar except in the duration of pair/group work activities and the rates of repetition and explicit correction. This study suggests that high school EFL teachers with teaching experience in private language institutes subscribe more closely to the tenets of communicative language teaching and thus can act as powerful agents of sustainable language teaching in Iranian public schools.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abdan A. (1991). An exploratory study of teaching English in the Saudi elementary public schools. System 19(3) 153-266.

  • Amjad R. & MacLeod G. (2014). Academic effectiveness of private public and private- public partnership schools in Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Development 37 22-31.

  • Azizfar A. Koosha M. & Lotfi A. R. (2010). An analytical evaluation of Iranian high school ELT textbooks from 1970 to the present. ELT 3(4) 132-141.

  • Babaei B. (2014). The same teacher different practices: A comparative analysis of EFL teachers’ practices in public and private language schools (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Urmia University Urmia. Iran.

  • Bagheri H. (1994). A profile for teaching and teaching English in pre-university schools of Sistan and Baluchestan: Problems and solutions (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Shiraz University Shiraz.

  • Besong F. & Holland C. (2015). The dispositions abilities and behaviors (DAB) framework for profiling learners’ sustainability competencies in higher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability 17(1) 5-22. DOI: 10.1515/jtes-2015-0001.

  • Borg S. (2007). Research engagement in English language teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education 23(5) 731-747.

  • Buckley L. A. (2010). Unfulfilled hopes in education for equity: redesigning the mathematics curriculum in a US high school. Journal of Curriculum Studies 42(1) 51-78.

  • Dahmardeh M. (2009). English language teaching in Iran. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag Dr. Muller Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG.

  • Darling-Hammond L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco CA: John Wiley and Sons.

  • Darling Hammond L. & McLaughlin M. W. (1996). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. In M. W. McLaghlin & I. Oberman (Eds) Teacher learning: New policies new practices (pp. 202-218). New York: Teachers College Press.

  • de la Campa J. & Nassaji H. (2009). The amount purpose and reasons for using L1 in L2 classrooms. Foreign Language Annals 42(4) 742-759.

  • Ellis R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Engin M. (2014). Macro-Scaffolding: Contextual support for teacher learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education 39(5) 25-40.

  • Fareh S. & Saeed A. T. (2011). The teacher as researcher in the context of language teaching. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 15 153-159.

  • Farrell T. S. C. (2006). Reflective practice in action: A case study of a writing teacherës reflections on practice. TESL Canada Journal 23(2) 77-90.

  • Fenwich L. & Cooper M. (2013). Learning about the Effects of Context on Teaching and Learning in pre-Service teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education 38(3) 97-110.

  • Fenwick L. Endicott M. Quinn M. & Humphrey S. (2014). Supporting the transference of knowledge about language within teacher education programs. Australian Journal of Teacher Education 39(11) 81-107.

  • French R. & Kingdon G. (2010). The relative effectiveness of private and government schools in Rural India: evidence from ASER data. Department of Quantitative Social Science (DoSS) Working Paper 10-03. London: Institute of Education University of London.

  • Galluzzo G. R. (2005). Performance assessment and renewing teacher education. Clearing House 78(4) 14245.

  • Gamoran A. (2010). Tracking and inequality: New directions for research and practice. In M. W. Apple S. J. Ball & L. A. Gandin (Eds.) The Routledge international handbook of thesociology of education (pp. 213-228). London and New York: Routledge.

  • Gamoran A. Secada W. & Marrett C. (2000). The organizational context of teaching and learning. In M. Hallinan (Ed.) Handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 37-63). Indiana Springer.

  • Hannaway J. (1991). The organization and management of public and Catholic schools: Looking inside the black box. International Journal of Educational Research 15(5) 463-483.

  • Harmer J. (2006). The practice of English language teaching. Pearson: Longman.

  • Huhn C. (2012). In search of innovation: A review of research on effective models on foreign language teacher preparation. Foreign Language Annals 45(1) 163-183.

  • Jimenez E. & Lockhead M. (1995). Public and private secondary education in developing countries: A comparative study world bank discussion paper no. 309. Washington DC: The World Bank.

  • Keihaniyan M. (2011). Teaching methodology and motivation: Comparison of Iranian English private institute and high school. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 2 (3) 588-599.

  • Kennedy M. (1996). Research genres in teacher education. In F. Murray (Ed.) The teacher educator’s handbook: Building a knowledge base for the preparation of teachers (pp. 120-154). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Kinsella K. (1991). Promoting active learning and classroom interaction through effective questioning strategies. Workshop presented at San Francisco State University. September 14.

  • Kuntz P. S. (1997). Language Institutes in Sana’a Yemen. ERIC Document Reproductive Services FL 024 462.

  • McKinnon M. Barza L. & Moussa-Intary J. (2013). Public versus private education in primary sciences: The case of Abu Dhabi schools. International Journal of Educational Research 62 51-61.

  • Milner H. R. (2010). What does teacher education have to do with teaching? Implications for diversity studies. Journal of Teacher Education 61(1-2) 118-131.

  • Musavi Z. (2001). An overview of the TEFL situation in various countries. Retrieved from

  • National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project. (2006). Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st Century (3rd ed.). Lawrence KS: Allen Press.

  • Nishino T. (2008). Japanese secondary school teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding communicative language teaching: an exploratory survey. JALT Journal 30(1) 27-51.

  • Oakes J. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. (2nd ed.). New Haven CT and London: Yale University Press.

  • Pazhouhesh M. (2014). Teaching English in state-run and private language schools in Iran: Approaches designs and procedures. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics 5(1) 43-56.

  • Penlington C. (2008). Dialogue as a catalyst for teacher change: A conceptual analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education 24(5) 1304-1316.

  • Philips S. & Borg S. (2009). Exploring tensions between teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System 37(3) 380-390.

  • Rahimi M. & Nabliou Z. (2010). Iranian EFL teachers’ effectiveness of instructional behavior in public and private high schools. Asia Pacific Education Review 12(1) 67-78.

  • Razmjoo A. & Riazi M. (2006a). Do high schools or private institutes practice communicative language teaching? A case study of Shiraz teachers in high schools and institutes. The Reading Matrix 6(3) 340-361.

  • Razmjoo A. & Riazi A. (2006b). On the teaching methodology of Shiraz EFL institutes. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities of Shiraz University 23(1) 58-70.

  • Redman E. (2013). Opportunities and challenges for integrating sustainability education into k-12 schools: Case study phoenix AZ. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability 15(2) 5-24.

  • Richards J. C. (1990). The dilemma of teacher education in second language teaching. In J. C. Richards & D. Nunan (Eds.) Second language teacher education (pp. 3-15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Richards J. C. (2002). Thirty years of TEFL/TESL: A personal reflection. RELC Journal. 33(2) 1-35.

  • Robert J. & Zody M. (1989). Using the research for effective supervision: Measuring a teacher’s questioning techniques. NASSP Bulletin 73(515) 8-14.

  • Rogoff B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Sadeghi K. & Babai H. (2009). Becoming an effective English language teacher: Living up to the expectations of L2 learners and teachers of English. Saarbrücken Germany: VDM Verlag.

  • Schick J. & Nelson P. (2001). Language teacher education: The challenge for the twenty-first century. Clearing House 74(6) 301-304.

  • Shrum J. L. & Glisan E. W. (2010). Teacher’s handbook: Contextualized language instruction (4th ed.). Boston: Cengage.

  • Sparks D. & Loucks-Horsley S. (1989). Five models of staff development for teachers. Journal of Staff Development 10(4) 40-57.

  • Tan Z. (2007). Questioning in Chinese university EL classrooms: What lies beyond it? RELC Journal 38(1) 87-103.

  • Teese R. & Polesel J. (2003). Undemocratic schooling: Equity and quality in mass secondary education in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

  • Tooley J. & Dixon P. (2006). De facto privatization of education and the poor: implications of a study from Sub-Saharan Africa and India. Compare 36(4) 443-462.

  • UNESCO (United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization). (2005). Guidelines and recommendations for reorienting teacher education to address sustainability. Education for Sustainable Development in Action Technical Paper No. 2 UNESCO Education sector.

  • Vygotsky L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Wertsch J. V. (1995). The need for action in sociocultural research. In J. V. Wertsch P. Del Rio & A. Alvarez (Eds.). Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 237-245). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 1.65

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.255
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.496

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 780 388 17
PDF Downloads 411 242 19