Energy and Transmissibility in Nonlinear Viscous Base Isolators

Open access

Abstract

High damping rubber bearings (HDRB) are the most commonly used base isolators in buildings and are often combined with other systems, such as sliding bearings. Their mechanical behaviour is highly nonlinear and dependent on a number of factors. At first, a physical process is suggested here to explain the empirical formula introduced by J.M. Kelly in 1991, where the dissipated energy of a HDRB under cyclic testing, at constant frequency, is proportional to the amplitude of the shear strain, raised to a power of approximately 1.50. This physical process is best described by non-Newtonian fluid behaviour, originally developed by F.H. Norton in 1929 to describe creep in steel at high-temperatures. The constitutive model used includes a viscous term, that depends on the absolute value of the velocity, raised to a non-integer power. The identification of a three parameter Kelvin model, the simplest possible system with nonlinear viscosity, is also suggested here. Furthermore, a more advanced model with variable damping coefficient is implemented to better model in this complex mechanical process. Next, the assumption of strain-rate dependence in their rubber layers under cyclic loading is examined in order to best interpret experimental results on the transmission of motion between the upper and lower surfaces of HDRB. More specifically, the stress-relaxation phenomenon observed with time in HRDB can be reproduced numerically, only if the constitutive model includes a viscous term, that depends on the absolute value of the velocity raised to a non-integer power, i. e., the Norton fluid previously mentioned. Thus, it becomes possible to compute the displacement transmissibility function between the top and bottom surfaces of HDRB base isolator systems and to draw engineering-type conclusions, relevant to their design under time-harmonic loads.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Bhuiyan A. K. Y. Okui H. Mitamura T. Imai. A Rheology Model of High Damping Rubber Bearings for Seismic Analysis: Identification of Nonlinear Viscosity. International Journal of Solids and Structures 46 (2009) 1778-1792.

  • [2] Markou A. A. G. Oliveto A. Mossucca F. C. Ponzo. Laboratory Experimental Tests on Elastomeric Bearing from the Solarino Project Progetto di Ricerca Report DPC - RELUIS Italy Potenza University of Basilicata 2014.

  • [3] Norton F. H. The Creep of Steels at High Temperatures New York McGraw- Hill 1929.

  • [4] Irgens F. Rheology and Non-Newtonian Fluids Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 2014.

  • [5] Besson J. G. Cailletaud J. L. Chaboche S. Forest M. Bletry. Non- Linear Mechanics of Materials Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 2010.

  • [6] DalľAsta A. L. Ragni. Experimental Tests and Analytical Model of High Damping Rubber Dissipating Devices. Engineering Structures 28 (2006) 1874-1884.

  • [7] Kelly J. M. Dynamic and Failure Characteristics of Bridgestone Isolation Bearings. Report No. UCB/EERC 91/04 CA Berkley Earthquake Engineering Re- search Center 1991.

  • [8] Kelly J. M. E. Quiroz. Mechanical Characteristics of Neoprene Isolation Bearings Report No. UCB/EERC 92/11 CA Berkley Earthquake Engineering Research Center 1992.

  • [9] Kelly J. M. Earthquake-Resistant Design with Rubber Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 1997.

  • [10] Naeim F. J. M. Kelly. Design of Seismic Isolated Structures from Theory to Practice New York John Wiley 1999.

  • [11] Weisstein E. W. Wallis Cosine Formula From MathWorld-A Wolfram Web Resource http://mathworld.wolfram.com/WallisCosineFormula.html 2003.

  • [12] Soong T. T. M. C. Constantinou. Passive and Active Structural Vibration Control in Civil Engineering Vienna Springer-Verlag 1994.

  • [13] Hansen N. The CMA-Evolution Strategy: A Tutorial https://www.lri.fr/~hansen/cmatutorial.pdf 2011.

  • [14] MATLAB The MathWorks Inc. Natick Massachusetts 2009.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.88

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.192
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.646

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2017: 0.01

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 160 78 3
PDF Downloads 95 51 0