Valerian (Valeriana officinalis L.) tolerance to some post-emergence herbicides

Open access

Abstract

Valerian (Valeriana officinalis L.) is a medicinal plant, but its cultivation is restricted by weed competition. Therefore, three rates (0.75X, 1X, and 1.25X, where X is equal to the recommended dose of haloxyfop-R (methyl ester), sethoxydim, oxadiargyl, bentazon, oxadiazon, and oxyfluorfen) were applied at the 3-4 leaf stages to valerian plants. This application was done to select the herbicide type and rate for post-controlling broadleaf and grasses weeds in this species. Herbicide injury, Soil-Plant Analyses Development (SPAD) reading, number of leaves per plant, stem diameter, and fresh and dry weights were determined 10, 20, and 30 days after herbicide application. Oxyfluorfen application caused the most herbicide injury followed by bentazon. Injury increased as the rate and the days after application increased. Oxadiazon only caused significant damage 30 days after application under all three rates. Other treatments showed no marked injuries under any rate or date after application, as compared with the control. Effects on other measured traits depended on the trait, herbicide, and herbicide rate. The highest SPAD, leaf number, shoot diameter, fresh weight and dry weight, was recorded under application of 30 mg a.i. ∙ kg-1 soil oxadiargyl and 90 mg a.i. ∙ kg-1 soil oxadiazon, 81 mg a.i. ∙ kg-1 soil haloxyfop-R, 37.5 mg a.i. ∙ kg-1 soil oxadiargyl, 22.5 mg a.i. ∙ kg-1 soil oxadiargyl, 81 mg a.i. ∙ kg-1 soil haloxyfop-R, and 81 mg a.i. ∙ kg-1 soil haloxyfop-R, respectively. To sum up, the results showed that sethoxydim, oxadiargyl, and haloxyfop-R produced no significant symptoms of phytotoxicity or reduction of measured traits. This means that oxadiargyl, haloxyfop-R, and sethoxydim may be used safely for weed control of valerian at the rates used in this experiment under similar conditions.

Al-Khatib K., Claassen M.M., Stahlman P.W., Geier P.W., Regehr D.L., Duncan S.R., Heer W.F. 2003. Grain sorghum response to simulated drift from glufosinate, glyphosate, imazethapyr, and sethoxydim. Weed Technology 17 (2): 261-265.

Alebrahim M.T., Majd R., Rashed Mohassel M.H., Wilcockson S., Baghestani M.A., Ghorbani R., Kudsk P. 2012. Evaluating the efficacy of pre- and post-emergence herbicides for controlling Amaranthus retroflexus L. and Chenopodium album L. in potato. Crop Protection 42: 345-350.

Brecke B.J., Stephenson D.O., Unruh J.B. 2010. Timing of oxadiazon and quinclorac application on newly sprigged turfgrass species. Weed Technology 24 (1): 28-32.

Bidlack J.E., Middick A., Shantz D., MacKown C.T., Williams R.D., Rao S.C. 2006. Weed control in a pigeon pea-wheat cropping system. Field Crops Research 96 (1): 63-70.

Boger P., Wakabayashi K. 1995. Peroxidizing herbicides I: mechanism of action. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 50c: 159-166.

Diebold S., Robinson D., Zandstra J., O’Sullivan J., Sikkema P.H. 2004. Sweet corn cultivar sensitivity to bentazon. Weed Technology 18 (4): 982-987.

Forcella F., Papiernik S.K., Gesch R.W. 2012. Postemergence herbicides for calendula. Weed Technology 26 (3): 566-569.

Kwiatkowski C. 2010. Evaluation of yield quality and weed infestation of common valerian (Valeriana officinalis L.) in dependence on weed control method and forecrop. Acta Agrobotanica 63 (2): 179-188.

Lamont G.P., Spohr L.J. 1988. Evaluation of oxadiazon and simazine for weed control and phytotoxicity in container-grown ornamental plants. Scientia Horticulturae 34 (1-2): 93-99.

Loken J.R., Hatterman-Valenti H.M. 2010. Multiple applications of reduced-rate herbicides for weed control in onion. Weed Technology 24 (2): 153-159.

Mine A., Miyakado M., Matsunaka S. 1975. The mechanism of bentazon selectivity. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 5 (6): 566-574.

Nethra N.S., Jagannath S. 2011. Phytotoxic effect of oxadiargyl on germination and early growth of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and maize (Zea mays L.). Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 44 (19): 1901-1907.

Norsworthy J.K., Smith J.P., Meister C. 2007. Tolerance of directseeded green onions to herbicides applied before or after crop emergence. Weed Technology 21 (1): 119-123.

Pank F., Hannig H.J., Hauschild J., Zygmunt B. 1980. Chemical weed control in medicinal plant crops (Valeriana officinalis L.). Pharmazie 35 (2): 115-119.

Pavlivna Radchenko M., Mykhailivna Sychuk A., Yulievich Morderer Y. 2014. Decrease of the herbicide fenoxaprop phytotoxicity in drought conditions: the role of the antioxidant enzymatic system. Journal of Plant Protection Research 54 (4): 390-394.

Qasem J.R., Foy C.L. 2006. Selective weed control in syrian marjoram (Origanum syriacum) with oxadiazon and oxyfluorfen herbicides. Weed Technology 20 (3): 670-676.

Sandmann G., Boger P. 1983. Comparison of the bleaching activity of norf1uorazon and oxyfluorfen. Weed Science 31: 338-341.

Soltani N., Robinson D.E., Shropshire C., Sikkema P.H. 2006. Adzuki bean (Vigna angularis) responses to post-emergence herbicides. Crop Protection 25 (6): 613-617.

Soltani N., Nurse R.E., Robinson D.E., Sikkema P.H. 2008. Response of pinto and small red mexican bean to postemergence herbicides. Weed Technology 22 (1): 195-199.

Stoltenberg D.E., Gronwald J.W., Wyse D.L., Burton J.D., Somers D.A., Gengenbach B.G. 1989. Effect of sethoxydim and haloxyfop on acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase activity in Festuca species. Weed Science 37 (4): 512-516.

Vencill W.K. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, IL, USA, 493 pp.

Yousefi A.R., Rahimi M.R. 2014. Integration of soil-applied herbicides at the reduced rates with physical control for weed management in fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.). Crop Protection 63: 107-112.

Zheljazkov V.D., Zhalnov I., Nedkov N.K. 2006. Herbicides for weed control in blessed thistle (Silybum marianum). Weed Technology 20 (4): 1030-1034.

Journal of Plant Protection Research

The Journal of Polish Society of Plant Protection, Committee of Plant Protection; Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute

Journal Information


CiteScore 2016: 0.84

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.332
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.829

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 178 129 12
PDF Downloads 104 94 11