Primary teachers go beyond the Slovak civic education curriculum


A number of studies have pointed to the low level of civic participation among young people. On the other hand, there is a section of the youth population that is politically involved in and supportive of extremist and anti-system political movements. Public discussions have suggested that this may be linked to inadequacies in citizenship education. However, as the Slovak case shows, the causes of this are deeper, have historic roots and are reflected in the fact that citizenship education has been pushed to the margins of the curriculum and is narrowly interpreted. Citizenship education is not just about the nature of the curriculum but also about broader extra-curricular activities and about the direct, or implicit, instruction provided by teachers. The empirical research presented here shows that primary school teachers go beyond the narrow framework of the national social studies syllabus and implicitly teach citizenship education in line with their own civic orientations.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abdi, H. (2003). Factor rotations in factor analyses. In Encyclopedia of social science. In M. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. Futing (Eds.), Research methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.

  • Allen, R. (2003). The democratic aims of service learning. Educational Leadership60 (6), 51–54.

  • Bae, B. (2009). Children’s right to participate – Challenges in everyday interactions. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal17(3), 391–406.

  • Dvořák, D., Dvořáková, B. M. (2015). Spoločenskovědní vzdělávání. In V. Spilková (Ed.), Proměny primárního vzdělávání v ČR (pp. 209 – 223). Praha: Portál.

  • Engle, S.H., & Ochoa, A.S. (1988). Education for democratic citizenship. New York: Teachers College Press.

  • Himmelmann, G. (2001). Demokratie-lernen als lebens-, gesellschafts- und herrschafts-form. Ein Lehr- und studienbuch. Schwalbach: Wochenschau Verlag.

  • Himmelmann, G. (2013). Competences for teaching, learning and living democratic citizenship. In M. Print, & D. Lange (Eds.), Civic education and competences for engaging citizens in democracies (pp. 3–7). Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.

  • Keating, A. (2009). Educating Europe’s citizens: Moving from national to post-national models of educating for European citizenship. Citizenship Studies13(2), 135-151.

  • Keating, A. (2016). Educating tomorrow’s citizens: What role can schools play?. Foro de Educación14(20), 35-47.

  • Kancír, J., & Madziková, A. (2003). Didaktika vlastivedy. Prešov: Univerzum.

  • Kerr, D. (1999). Citizenship education in the curriculum: An international review. The School Field10 (3-4), 5-32.

  • Lárusdóttir, S. H. (2013). Role výchovy a vzdělávání v procesu utváření morálního přístupu k vedení. Studia Paedagogica18(2–3), 141–56.

  • Leenders, H., Veugelers, W., & De Kat, E. (2008). Teachers’ views on citizenship education in secondary education in the Netherlands. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(2), 155–170.

  • McCowan, T. (2009). Rethinking citizenship education: A curriculum for participatory Democracy. London: Continuum.

  • McLaughlin, T., H. (1992). Citizenship diversity and education: A philosophical perspective. Journal of Moral Education21(3), 235–246.

  • Milner, H. (2002). Civic literacy: How informed citizens make democracy work. Hanover: University Press.

  • Mindes, G. (2005). Social studies in today’s early childhood curricula. YC Young Children, p. 12 – 18.

  • Mistrík, E. (1996). Minister aj bezdomovec. Civitas, 2(6), p. 1.

  • Moss, P. (2007). Bringing politics into the nursery: Early childhood education as a democratic practice. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal15(1), 5–20.

  • Nelson, J., & D. Kerr. (2006). Active citizenship in INCA countries: Definitions, policies, practices and outcomes: Final Report. England: National foundation for Educational Research.

  • Nogueira, F., & Moreira, A. (2012). A framework for civic education teachers’ knowledge. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences47(2012), 1179 – 1183.

  • Palouš, R. (2008). Je svět (hodnotově) dvojí nebo jeden? In Paidea5(2).

  • Rapoport, A. (2015). Challenges and opportunities: Resocialization as a framework for global citizenship education In J. Zajda (Ed.), Globalisation, ideology and politics of education reforms, globalisation, comparative education and policy research (pp. 11-23). Springer.

  • Schmeets, H., & M. Coumans. (2013). The assessment of social cohesion and social exclusion in the Netherlands. Paper presented at the UNESCO workshop on Measuring and Assessing Inclusive Social Policies. Paris, March 25–26.

  • Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Kerr, D., & Losito, B. (2010). ICCS 2009 International report: Civic knowledge, attitudes, and engagement among lower-secondary school students in 38 countries. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).

  • Stará, J. (2004). Výchova k demokratickému občanství v primární škole. Praha: UK.

  • Stará, J. (2005). Výchova k demokratickému občanství. In V. Spilková, et al. (Ed.), Proměny primárního vzdělávání (pp. 225–243). Praha: Portál.

  • Torney-Purta, J., & Barber, C. (2011). Fostering young people’s support for participatory human rights through their developmental niches. American Journal of Orthpsychiatry81 (4), 473-481.

  • Wood, B. E. (2012). Scales of active citizenship: New Zealand teachers’ diverse perceptions and practices. International Journal of Progressive Education8(3), 77 – 93.

  • Zápotočná, O., & Lukšík, I. (2010). Modely občianského vzdelávania a ich podiel na formovaní aktívneho demokratického občianstva. In: J. Plichtová (Ed.), Občianstvo, participácia a deliberácia na Slovensku. Teória a realita (pp. 313 – 332). Bratislava: Veda.


Journal + Issues