[Adey, P. (2003). Changing minds. Educational and Child Psychology, 20(2), 19-30.10.53841/bpsecp.2003.20.2.19]Search in Google Scholar
[Adey, P., Shayer, M., & Yates, C. (1992). Thinking science. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.]Search in Google Scholar
[Arbitman-Smith, R., & Haywood, H. C. (1980). Cognitive education for learning-disabled adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8(1), 51-64.10.1007/BF00918161]Search in Google Scholar
[Ashman, A. F., & Conway, R. N. F. (1989). Teaching planning skills in the classroom: the development of an integrated model. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 36(3), 225-240.10.1080/0156655893603005]Search in Google Scholar
[Ashman, A. F., & Conway, R. N. F. (1997). Cognition and cognitive concepts. In An introduction to cognitive education: Theory and applications (pp. 41-61). London, UK: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1916). The development of intelligence in the child. The development of intelligence in children. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78(2), 647-663.10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Budoff, M. (1987a). The validity of learning potential assessment. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 52-81). New York: Guilford Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Budoff, M. (1987b). Measures for assessing learning potential. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 173-195). New York: Guilford Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Buchel, F. P., & Scharnhorst, U. (1993). The learning potential assessment device (LPAD): discussion of theoretical and methodological problems. In J. H. M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma, & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning Potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 13-18). Amsterdam: Swets, Zeitlinger.]Search in Google Scholar
[Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82-109). New York: Guilford Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Das, J. P. (1999). PASS Reading Enhancement Program (PREP). Edmonton, AB: J. P.]Search in Google Scholar
[Das Centre on Learning and Developmental Disabilities.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Bono, E. (1991). I am right, you are wrong. From this to the new renaissance: From rock logic to water logic. UK: Penguin Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dehn, M. J. (2008). Working memory and academic learning: Assessment and intervention. Hoboken, NJ: Jon Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Doidge, N. (2007). The brain that changes itself: Stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. US: Viking Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Drubach, D. (2000). The brain explained. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health.]Search in Google Scholar
[Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939-944.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Dzuka, J., & Kovalcikova, I. (2008a). Dynamické testovanie latentných učebných schopností. Československá psychologie, 52(4), 366-377.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dzuka, J., & Kovalcikova, I. (2008b). Sociálne znevýhodňujúce prostredie a dieťa zo sociálne znevýhodňujúceho prostredia, pojem a definícia. Československá psychologie, 52(6), 633-637.]Search in Google Scholar
[Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1991). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. Eugene, OR: ADI Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferrara, R. A., Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1986). Children’s learning and transfer of inductive reasoning rules: Studies of proximal development. Child development, 57(5), 1087-1099.10.2307/1130433]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferrer, E., McArdle, J. J., Shawitz, B. A., Holahan, J. N., Marchione, K., & Shawitz, S. E. (2007). Longitudinal models of developmental dynamics between reading and cognition from childhood to adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1460-1473.10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1460]Search in Google Scholar
[Feuerstein, R. (1970). A dynamic approach to causation, prevention, and alleviation of retarded performance. In C. Haywood (Ed.), Social-cultural aspects of mental retardation. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.]Search in Google Scholar
[Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., Falik, L. H., & Rand, Y. (2002). The dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability: The learning propensity assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Jerusalem, Israel: ICELP Press. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., & Miller, R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Filickova, M., Kovalcikova, I., & Ropovik, I. (2015). The role of simultaneous and successive processing in EFL reading. International Journal of Psychology. Advance Online Publication.]Search in Google Scholar
[Glaser, R. (1988). Cognitive science and education. In J. Crowley (Ed.), International Social Science Journal, 40(1), 21-44.]Search in Google Scholar
[Greenberg, K. H. (2000). Attending to hidden needs: The cognitive enrichment advantage perspective. Educational and Child Psychology: Psychological Influences upon Educational Intervention, 17(3), 51-69.10.53841/bpsecp.2000.17.3.51]Search in Google Scholar
[Greenfield, P. M. (1997). You can’t take it with you: Why ability assessments don’t cross cultures. American psychologist, 52(10), 1115-1124.10.1037/0003-066X.52.10.1115]Search in Google Scholar
[Guilford, J. P. (1977). Way beyond the IQ. Boston, MA: Creative Education Foundation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guthke J. (1993). Developments in learning potential assessment. In J. H. M. Hamers & K. Sijtsma (Eds.), Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 43-67). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hansen, A. (2009). Basic conceptual systems (BCSs) - tools for analytic coding, thinking and learning: A concept teaching curriculum in Norway. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(3), 160-169.10.1016/j.tsc.2009.09.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Haywood, H. C. (1977). A cognitive approach to the education of retarded children. Peabody Journal of Education, 54(2), 110-116.10.1080/01619567709538116]Search in Google Scholar
[Haywood, H. C. (2004). From the editor: Current concepts in cognitive development and education: A topical issue. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 4(2), 181-182.10.1891/194589504787382802]Search in Google Scholar
[Haywood, H. C., Brooks, P. H., & Burns, M. S. (1992). Bright Start: Cognitive curriculum for young children. Watertown, MA: Charlesbridge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. (2007). Dynamic Assessment in Practice. London: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haywood, H. C., & Tzuriel, D. (2002). Applications and challenges in dynamic assessment. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(2), 38-61.10.1207/S15327930PJE7702_5]Search in Google Scholar
[Howard-Jones, P. (2010). The teacher’s handbook of twig: Minds, brains and teaching with immersive gaming. Available at: www.lulu.com:NEnet.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ihnot, C., Kilkelly, C., & Nichols, M. (2000). Read naturally: Master’s edition, reading level 5.8/6.0 (Blackline Masters). Saint Paul, MI: Read Naturally.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jitendra, A. K., & Kameenui, E. J. (1994). A review of concept learning models: Implications for special education practitioners. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30(2), 91-98.10.1177/105345129403000205]Search in Google Scholar
[Karpov, Y. (2008). Do all dynamic assessment techniques assess learning potential? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 7(3), 411-418.10.1891/194589508787724132]Search in Google Scholar
[Kirby, J. R., & Robinson, G. W. (1987). Simultaneous and successive processing in reading disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(4), 243-252.10.1177/002221948702000409]Search in Google Scholar
[Klauer, K. (1987). Criterion-referenced testing: The inference to the item pool. Zeitschrift für differentielle und diagnostische Psychologie, 8, 141-147.]Search in Google Scholar
[Klauer, K. J., & Phye, G. D. (1995). Fallbuch der klinischen Psychologie: Modelle psychischer Storungen. Einzelfallstudien zum Lehrbuch der klinischen Psychologie. Germany: Hogrefe, Verlag fur Psychologie.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R., & Mainemelis, C. (2000). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In R. J. Sternberg, & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive learning and thinking styles. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kozulin, A. (1999). Profiles of immigrant students` cognitive performance on Raven`s progressive matrices. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87(3), 1311-1314.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kulistak, P. (2003). Neuropsychologie. Praha: Portál.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lebeer, J., Candeias, A., & Gracio, M. L. (2011). With a different glance. Dynamic assessment and functioning of children oriented at development & inclusive learning. Belgium: Garant Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lidz, C. S. (1992). Dynamic assessment: Some thoughts on the model, the medium, and the message. Learning and individual differences, 4(2), 125--36.10.1016/1041-6080(92)90009-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Lovett, M. W., Lacerenza, L., & Borden, S. B. (2000). Putting struggling readers on the PHAST track: A program to integrate phonological and strategy-based remedial reading instruction and maximize outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(5), 458-476.10.1177/002221940003300507]Search in Google Scholar
[Luther, M., & Wyatt, F. (1996). A comparison of Feuerstein’s method of (LPAD) assessment with conventional IQ testing on disadvantaged North York high school students. In M. Luther, E. Cole, & P. Gamlin (Eds.), Dynamic assessment for instruction: From theory to application (pp. 168-181). Ontario: Captus Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Malda, M., Van de Vijver, F. R., Srinivasan, K., Transler, C., Sukumar, P., & Rao, K. (2008). Adapting a cognitive test for a different culture: An illustration of qualitative procedures. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50(4), 451-468.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marzano, R. J. (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meeker, M. (1965). A procedure for relating Stanford Binet behavior samplings to Guilford’s structure of the intellect. Journal of School Psychology, 3(3), 26-36.10.1016/0022-4405(65)90037-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Miles, D., & Forcht, J. P. (1995). Mathematics strategies for secondary students with learning disabilities or mathematics deficiencies: A cognitive approach. Intervention in School and Clinic, 31, 91-96.10.1177/105345129503100205]Search in Google Scholar
[Minnaert, A. (2002). Alternative assessment of students’ domain-specific learning competencies in the transition of secondary to higher education. In G. M. Van der Aalsvoort, W. C. M. Resing, & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: Actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (Volume 7, pp. 335-351). Amsterdam: JAI.]Search in Google Scholar
[Murphy, R. (2007). Exploring a meta-theoretical framework for dynamic assessment and intelligence. Dissertation thesis. University of Pretoria.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nyborg, M. (1993). Pedagogy: The study of how to provide optimum conditions of learning for persons who may differ widely in pre-requisites for learning. Norway: Nordisk undervisningsforlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. (2007). OECD Factbook 2007 - Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics. OECD.10.1787/journal_dev-v8-2-en]Search in Google Scholar
[Paour, J. L., & Soavi, G. (1992). A case study in the induction of logic structures. In H. C. Haywood, & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive Assessment (pp. 419-442). New York: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Primi, R., Ferrão, M. E., & Almeida, L. S. (2010). Fluid intelligence as a predictor of learning: A longitudinal multilevel approach applied to math. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 446-451. 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.05.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Rand, Y., & Kaniel, S. (1987). Group administration of the LPAD. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: an interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 196-214). NewYork: The Guilford Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Resing, W. C. M. (2013). Dynamic testing and individualized instruction: Helpful in cognitive education? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(1), 81-95.10.1891/1945-8959.12.1.81]Search in Google Scholar
[Resing, W. C. M., Roth, J. M., & Van der Werf, T. J. M. (2002). Learning potential assessment and cognitive training in inductive reasoning: emergent relationship? In G. M. Van der Aalsvoort, W. C. M. Resing, & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (Volume 7, pp. 175-208). Amsterdam: JAI.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ropovik, I. (2014). Do executive functions predict the ability to learn problem-solving principles? Intelligence, 44, 64-74.10.1016/j.intell.2014.03.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Educating for innovation. In A. Craft, & R. Wegerif (Eds.), The International Journal of Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(1), 41-48.10.1016/j.tsc.2005.08.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Sousa, D. (2001). How the brain learns. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Freeman, D. (1984). Intelligence, cognitive skills and early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 278-303.10.2307/747822]Search in Google Scholar
[Sternberg, R. J. (2013). Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12, (1), 4-5.10.1891/1945-8959.12.1.4]Search in Google Scholar
[Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic Testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stevenson C. E. (2012). Puzzling with potential. Dynamic testing of analogical reasoning in children (Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Ipskamp Drukkerij.]Search in Google Scholar
[Swanson, H. L., & Lussier, C. M. (2001). A selective synthesis of the experimental literature on dynamic assessment. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 321-363.10.3102/00346543071002321]Search in Google Scholar
[Taub, G., Floyd, R. G., Keith, T. Z., & McGrew, K. S. (2008). Effects of general and broad cognitive abilities on mathematics. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(2), 187-198.10.1037/1045-3830.23.2.187]Search in Google Scholar
[Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2010). Mind, brain and education science. New York: W.W. Norton Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tzuriel, D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of young children. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4615-1255-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Tzuriel, D. (2002). Cognitive education: The menace and the hope. In G. M. Van der Aalsvoort, W. C. M. Resing, & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Eds ), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (Volume 7, pp. 355-363). Amsterdam: JAI.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tzuriel, D., & Klein, P. S. (1987). Assessing the young child: Children’s analogical thinking modifiability. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.). Dynamic assessment: an interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 268-287). New York: Guilford Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tzuriel, D., & Shamir, A. (2007). The effects of peer mediation with young children (PMYC) on children’s cognitive modifiability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 143-165.10.1348/000709905X84279]Search in Google Scholar
[Ukrainetz, T. W., Harpell, S., Walsh, C., & Coyle, C. (2000). A preliminary investigation of dynamic assessment with Native American kindergartners. Language, speech and hearing services in schools, 31(2), 142-154.10.1044/0161-1461.3102.142]Search in Google Scholar
[Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press]Search in Google Scholar
[Walsh. K. (1978). Neuropsychology: A clinical approach. New York: Churchill Livingston.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolf, O. T., Schommer, N. C., Hellhammer, D. H., Reischies, F. M., & Kirschbaum, C. (2002). Moderate psychosocial stress appears not to impair recall of words learned four weeks prior to stress exposure. Stress: The International Journal on the Biology of Stress, 5(1), 59-6410.1080/102538902900012332]Search in Google Scholar
