The development of a new method of idiographic measurement for dynamic assessment intervention

Open access


This paper proposes a new method of idiographic measurement for dynamic assessment (DA) intervention. There are two main methods of measurement for DA intervention; split -half tests and integrated scoring systems. Split-half tests of ability have proved useful from a research perspective. Integrated scoring systems coupled with case studies are useful from a practitioner perspective. The purpose of this research is to bridge the gap between research and practice by developing a methodology that is compatible with both. To this end the paper proposes a measureable idiographic method of measurement, which utilises multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) and general procrustean analysis (GPA) to analyse the result of card-sort data gathered from a learner across the entire intervention. This approach provides a method of assessment, which is both compatible with individual intervention and suited to building a body of evidence-based research for DA. An example of the method in practice is given for illustrative purposes. The initial results suggest that this approach provides a methodology that satisfies the requirements of both practitioners when formulating targeted intervention and researchers who require methods of measurement of change in ability of the individual over time.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Allport G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.

  • Bandura A. (1971). Social learning theory. Stanford: General Learning Corporation.

  • Barrett P.T. (2003). Beyond psychometrics: measurement non-quantitative structure and applied numerics. Journal of Managerial Psychology 18(3) 421-439.

  • Binet A. & Simon T. (1905). Application des methods nouvelles au diagnostic du niveau Intellectual des anormaux d’hospice et d’école primaire. [Application of new methods for the diagnosis of intellectual level of abnormal persons in institutions and elementary schools]. Année Psychologique 11 245-336.

  • Bronfenbrenner U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge MA.: Harvard University Press.

  • Bruner J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.

  • Buja A Swayne D. Littman M.L. Dean N. & Hoffamnn H. (2008) Interactive data visualization with multidimensional scaling. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 17(2) 444-472. Education Act (1998). Dail Eireann Ireland.

  • Feuerstein R. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performance. Baltimore MD.: University Park Press.

  • Fransella F. (2005). the essential practitioners’ handbook of personal construct psychology. John Chichester UK: Wiley & Sons.

  • Fransella F. Bell R. & Bannister D. A. (2003). Manual for repertory grid technique. UK: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Hammond S. (2014). MDA and GPA software for analysis of idiographic data form multiple card-sorts. Copyright 2014.

  • Hammond S. & O’Rourke M. (2007). The measurement of individual change: A didactic account of an idiographic approach. Psychology Crime & Law 13(1) 81 - 95.

  • Harré R. (1998). The singular self: An introduction to the psychology of personhood. London: Sage.

  • Haywood H. C. (2008). Twenty years of IACEP and a focus on dynamic assessment: Progress problems and prospects. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology. 7(3) 419-442.

  • Hurley E. (2013a). Integrated social learning theory - A dynamic alternative to current theory and practice in psycho-educational assessment and intervention for marginalized individuals. Presentation IACEP Conference Leiden The Netherlands.

  • Hurley E. (2013b). An IAT test measuring attitudes to formal education. Copyright E. Hurley.

  • Kelly G.A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.

  • Kruskal J.B. & Wish M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills and London: Sage Publications.

  • Lang P.J. Bradley M.M. & Cuthbert B.N. (2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-8. University of Florida. USA.

  • Lidz C. S. (1991). A Practitioner‘s guide to dynamic assessment. New York : Guilford Press.

  • Lidz C.S. & Elliott J.G. (2000). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications. USA: Elsevier Science.

  • Lingoes J.C. Roskam E.E. & Borg I. (1979). Geometric representations of relational data- readings in multidimensional scaling. USA: Mathesis Press.

  • Lodge A. & Lynch K (2004). Diversity at school. Dublin: The Equality Authority.

  • Luria A.R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. USA: Harvard University Press.

  • Luria A.R. (1979). The making of mind: A personal account of soviet psychology. Cambridge MA.: Harvard University Press.

  • Mischel W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review 80(4) 252-283.

  • Molenaar P.C.M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: bringing the person back into scientific psychology this time forever. Measurement 2(4) 201-218.

  • Murphy R. (2010). Dynamic assessment intelligence and measurement. London: Wiley & Sons. London. Psychological Society of Ireland. (2008). Code of professional ethics. Dublin: Psychological Society of Ireland.

  • Rogers C. (1959). A theory of therapy personality and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.). Psychology: A study of a science. Vol. 3: Formulations of the Person and the Social Context. New York: McGraw Hill.

  • Rogoff B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Runyan W.M. (1983). Idiographic goals and measures in the study of lives. Journal of Personality. 51(3) 413-437.

  • Sternberg R. J. & Grigorenko E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Steyvers M. (2002). Multidimensional scaling. In: Encyclopedia of cognitive science.

  • Stroop J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 18(6) 643-662.

  • Van Geert P. (1994). Dynamic systems of development. UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

  • Vygotsky L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher-order psychological processes. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Whaley A. & Longoria R.A. (2008). Preparing Card Sort Data for Multidimensional Scaling Analysis in Social Psychological Research: A Methodological Approach. The Journal of Social Psychology 148(2) 105-115.

  • Young F.W. (1987). Multidimensional Scaling: History Theory and Applications. New York: Erlbaum Associates

Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.34

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.126
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.266

Gesamte Zeit Letztes Jahr Letzte 30 Tage
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 306 88 3
PDF Downloads 154 70 5