Decomposing Multilateral Price Indexes into the Contributions of Individual Commodities

Open access

Abstract

This article describes methods for decomposing price indexes into contributions from individual commodities, to help understand the influence of each commodity on aggregate price index movements.

Previous authors have addressed the decomposition of bilateral price indexes, which aggregate changes in commodity prices from one time period to another. Our focus is the decomposition of multilateral price indexes, which aggregate commodity prices across more than two time periods or countries at once. Multilateral indexes have historically been used for spatial comparisons, and have recently received attention from statistical agencies looking to produce temporal price indexes from large and high frequency price data sets, such as scanner data. Methods for decomposing these indexes are of practical relevance.

We present decompositions of three multilateral price indexes. We also review methods proposed by other researchers for extending multilateral indexes without revising previously published index levels, and show how to decompose the extended indexes they produce. Finally, we use a data set of seasonal prices and quantities to illustrate how these decomposition methods can be used to understand the influence of individual commodities on multilateral price index movements, and to shed light on the relationships between various multilateral and extension methods.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2016. “Making Greater Use of Transactions Data to Compile the Consumer Price Index, Australia.” Cat. no. 6401.0.60.003. Canberra: ABS. Available at: https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/mf/6401.0.60.003 (accessed May 2019).

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2017. “An Implementation Plan to Maximise the Use of Transactions Data in the CPI.” Cat. no. 6401.0.60.004. Canberra: ABS. Available at: https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/mf/6401.0.60.004 (accessed May 2019).

Balk, B.M. 2008. Price and Quantity Index Numbers: Models for Measuring Aggregate Change and Difference. New York: Cambridge University Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511720758.

Caves, D.W., L.R. Christensen, and W.E. Diewert. 1982. “Multilateral Comparisons of Output, Input, and Productivity Using Superlative Index Numbers.” The Economic Journal 92(365): 73–86. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2232257.

Chessa, A. 2015. “Towards a Generic Price Index Method for Scanner Data in the Dutch CPI.” Paper presented at the 14th meeting of the Ottawa Group, Tokyo, 20–22 May 2015. Available at: http://www.stat.go.jp/english/info/meetings/og2015/pdf/t1s1room2.pdf (accessed August 2017).

Chessa, A., J. Verburg, and L. Willenborg. 2017. “A Comparison of Price Index Methods for Scanner Data.” Paper presented at the 15th meeting of the Ottawa Group, Eltville, 10–12 May 2017. Available at: https://www.bundesbank.de/Redaktion/EN/Downloads/Bundesbank/Research_Centre/Conferences/2017/2017_05_10_ottawa_group_07_1_paper.pdf (accessed February 2018).

Collier, I.L. 1999. “Comment.” International and Interarea Comparisons of Income, Output, and Prices, edited by A. Heston and R. E. Lipsey, 87–107. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226331126.001.0001.

De Haan, J. 2015. “A Framework for Large Scale Use of Scanner Data in the Dutch CPI.” Paper presented at the 14th meeting of the Ottawa Group, Tokyo, 20–22 May 2015. Available at: http://www.stat.go.jp/english/info/meetings/og2015/pdf/t6s11p33_pap.pdf (accessed August 2017).

De Haan, J., R. Hendriks, and M. Scholz. 2016. “A Comparison of Weighted Time-Product Dummy and Time Dummy Hedonic Indexes.” Paper presented at the 15th meeting of the Ottawa Group, Eltville, 10–12 May 2017. Available at: https://www.bundesbank.de/resource/blob/636054/f20b4679b121998a5ae5f106a11ee5a1/mL/2017-05-10-ottawagroup-07-4-paper-data.pdf (accessed February 2019).

De Haan, J. and F. Krsinich. 2014. “Scanner Data and the Treatment of Quality Change in Nonrevisable Price Indexes.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 32(3): 341–358. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2014.880059.

Diewert, W.E. 2002. “The Quadratic Approximation Lemma and Decompositions of Superlative Indexes.” Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 28(1,2): 63–88. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/JEM-2003-0200.

Diewert, W.E. and K.J. Fox. 2017. “Substitution Bias in Multilateral Methods for CPI Construction using Scanner Data.” Paper presented at the 15th meeting of the Ottawa Group, Eltville, 10–12 May 2017. Available at: https://www.bundesbank.de/resource/blob/635970/864de61dee8f2b67dcb3ed2a2ab479c5/mL/2017-05-10-ottawa-group-07-2-paper-data.pdf (accessed February 2019).

Éltetö, Ö., and P. Köves. 1964. “On an Index Number Computation Problem in International Comparison” (in Hungarian). In Statisztikai Szemle, 42: 507–18. Available at: https://www.ksh.hu/statszemle_archivum#year=1964/issue=05 (accessed May 2019).

Geary, R.C. 1958. “A Note on the Comparison of Exchange Rates and Purchasing Power Between Countries.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) 121(1): 97–99. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2342991.

Gini, C. 1931. “On the Circular Test of Index Numbers.” Metron 9(9): 3–24.

Howard, A., K. Dunford, J. Jones, M. van Kints, K. Naylor, and R. Tarnow-Mordi. 2015. “Using Transactions Data to Enhance the Australian CPI.” Paper presented at the 14th meeting of the Ottawa Group, Tokyo, 20–22 May 2015. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org/Ottawa/ottawagroup.nsf/4a256353001af3ed4b2562bb00121564/d012f001b8a1cf6cca257eed008074c9/$FILE/Australian_Bureau_of_Statistics-Using_transactions_data_to_enhance_the_Australian_CPI.pdf (accessed August 2017).

ILO, IMF, OECD, UNECE, Eurostat, The World Bank. 2004. Consumer Price Index Manual: Theory and Practice. Geneva: International Labour Organization. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5089/9789221136996.069.

Ivancic, L., W. Erwin Diewert, and K.J. Fox. 2011. “Scanner Data, Time Aggregation and the Construction of Price Indexes.” Journal of Econometrics 161(1): 24–35. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.09.003.

Khamis, S.H. 1972. “A New System of Index Numbers for National and International Purposes.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) 135(1): 96–121. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2345041.

Krsinich, F. 2016. “The FEWS Index: Fixed Effects with a Window Splice.” Journal of Official Statistics 32(2): 375. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jos-2016-0021.

Puntanen, S., and G.P.H. Styan. 2006. “Historical Introduction: Issai Schur and the Early Development of the Schur Complement.” In The Schur Complement and its Applications, edited by F. Zhang. 1–16. New York: Springer. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24273-2_1.

Rao, D.S.P. 1990. “A System of Log-Change Index Numbers for Multilateral Comparisons.” In Contributions to Economic Analysis 194: 127–139. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-88409-1.50013-0.

Rao, D.S.P. 2005. “On the Equivalence of Weighted Country-Product-Dummy (CPD) Method and the Rao-System For Multilateral Price Comparisons.” Review of Income and Wealth 51(4): 571–80. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2005.00169.x.

Reinsdorf, M.B., W.E. Diewert, and C. Ehemann. 2002. “Additive Decompositions for Fisher, Törnqvist and Geometric Mean Indexes.” Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 28(1,2): 51–61. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/jem-2003-0194.

Ribe, M. 2012. “Some Properties of the RGEKS Index for Scanner Data.” Paper presented at Statistics Sweden’s scanner data workshop, 7–8 June 2012, Stockholm, Sweden. Available at: https://www.scb.se/Statistik/PR/PR0101/_dokument/Some%20properties%20of%20the%20RGEKS%20index%20for%20scanner%20data.pdf (accessed February 2019).

Summers, R. 1973. “International Price Comparisons based upon Incomplete Data.” Review of Income and Wealth 19(1): 1–16. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1973.tb00870.x.

Szulc, B. 1964. “Index Numbers of Multilateral Regional Comparisons” (in Polish). In Przeglad Statysticzny, 3: 239–54.

Turvey, R. 1979. “Treatment of Seasonal Items in Consumer Price Indices.” In Bulletin of Labor Statistics, 4, 13–23. Geneva: ILO. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/P/09606/09606(1979-4)XIII-XXIII.pdf (accessed May 2019).

University of Chicago. 2018. “Kilts Center for Marketing: Dominick’s Data Manual.” Chicago: University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Available at: https://www.chicagobooth.edu/-/media/enterprise/centers/kilts/datasets/dominicksdataset/dominicks-manual-and-codebook_kiltscenter.aspx (accessed November 2018).

Van IJzeren, J. 1952. “On the Plausibility of Fisher’s Ideal Indices” (in Dutch). In Statistische en Econometrische Onderzoekingen, Nieuwe Reeks, 7, 104–15. The Hague: CBS.

Van IJzeren, J. 1983. “Index Numbers for Binary and Multilateral Comparison: Algebraical and Numerical Aspects.” In Statistical Studies, 34. The Hague: CBS.

Vartia, Y.O. 1974. “Relative Changes and Economic Indices.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki.

Vartia, Y.O. 1976. “Ideal Log-Change Index Numbers.” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 3(3): 121–126. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615624 (accessed May 2019).

Journal of Official Statistics

The Journal of Statistics Sweden

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0,837
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0,934

CiteScore 2018: 1.04

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.963
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.020

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 254 254 168
PDF Downloads 224 224 153