Is the Top Tail of the Wealth Distribution the Missing Link between the Household Finance and Consumption Survey and National Accounts?

Open access

Abstract

The financial accounts of the household sector within the system of national accounts report the aggregate asset holdings and liabilities of all households within a country. In principle, when household wealth surveys are explicitly designed to be representative of all households, aggregating these microdata should correspond to the macro-aggregates. In practice, however, differences are large. We first discuss conceptual and generic differences between those two sources of data. Thereafter, we investigate missing top tail observation from wealth surveys as a source of discrepancy. By fitting a Pareto distribution to the upper tail, we provide an estimate of how much of the gap between the micro- and macrodata is caused by the underestimation of the top tail of the wealth distribution. Conceptual and generic differences, as well as missing top tail observations, explain part of the gap between financial accounts and survey aggregates.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Alvaredo F. A. Atkinson L. Chancel T. Piketty E. Saez and G. Zucman. 2016. “Distributional National Accounts (DINA) guidelines: Concepts and methods used in WID.world.” WID Working Paper Series No. 2016/2. Available at: https://wid.world/document/dinaguidelines-v1/ (accessed February 2019).

  • Alvaredo F. L. Chancel T. Piketty E. Saez and G. Zucman. 2017. “Global inequality dynamics: New findings from WID.world.” NBER Working Paper No. 23119. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3386/w23119.

  • Andreasch M. P. Fessler and P. Lindner. 2013. “Linking Microdata and Macrodata on Austrian Household Financial Wealth Using HFCS and Financial Accounts Data.” Statistiken Special Issue Oesterreichische Nationalbank 14–23. Available at: https://www.oenb.at/dam/jcr:048c539b-0f03-480e-992c-db2948c68416/stat_2009_q1_gesamt_tcm14-96306.pdf (accessed February 2019).

  • Antoniewicz R. 2000. “A Comparison of the Household Sector from the Flow of Funds Accounts and the Survey of Consumer Finances.” Federal Reserve Board of Governors Survey of Consumer Finances Working Paper. Available at: https://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/scf/files/antoniewicz_paper.pdf (accessed February 2019).

  • Bach S. A. Thiemann and A. Zucco. 2015. “The Top Tail of the Wealth Distribution in Germany France Spain and Greece.” Discussion Paper 1502 DIW Berlin. Available at: https://www.diw.de/sixcms/detail.php?id=diw_01.c.513263.de (accessed February 2019).

  • Bover O. E. Coronado and P. Velilla. 2014. “The Spanish survey of household finances (EFF): description and methods of the 2011 wave.” Banco de España occasional Paper 1407. Available at: https://www.bde.es/f/webbde/SES/Secciones/Publicaciones/PublicacionesSeriadas/DocumentosOcasionales/14/Fich/do1407.pdf (accessed February 2019).

  • Bricker J. A. Henriques J. Krimmel and J. Sabelhaus. 2016a. “Measuring Income and Wealth at the top using administrative and survey data.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Spring: 261–312. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/brickertextspring16bpea.pdf (accessed February 2019).

  • Bricker J. A. Henriques J. Krimmel and J. Sabelhaus. 2016b. “Online Appendix to Measuring Income and Wealth at the top using administrative and survey data.” Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/brickerappendixspring16bpea.pdf (accessed February 2019).

  • Chakraborty R. and S. Waltl. 2018. “Missing the wealthy in the HFCS: Micro problems with macro implications.” ECB Working Paper Series 2163. Available at: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecb.wp2163.en.pdf? (accessed February 2019).

  • Davies J.B. and A. Shorrocks. 1999. “The Distribution of Wealth.” In Handbook of Income Distribution: Volume 1 edited by A.B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon 605–675. North-Holland Amsterdam.

  • Dettling L.J. S.J. Devlin-Foltz J. Krimmel S.J. Pack and J.P. Thompson. 2015. “Comparing Micro and Macro Sources for Household Accounts in the United States: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances.” Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2015-086. Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2015.086.

  • Dolan K.A. 2016. “Methodology: How We Crunch the Numbers.” Forbes www-sides. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/kerryadolan/2012/03/07/methodology-how-we-crunch-the-numbers/ (accessed February 2019).

  • ECB. 2012. “HFCS Core Variables Catalogue Wave I.” Available at: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/home/pdf/research/hfcn/core_output_variables.pdf (accessed February 2019).

  • ECB. 2013. “The Eurosystem Household Finance and Consumption Survey: Methodological Report for the First Wave.” European Central Bank Statistics Paper Series 1. Available at: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/ecbsp1en.pdf (accessed February 2019).

  • Eckerstorfer P. J. Halak J. Kapeller B. Schütz F. Springholz and R. Wildauer. 2016. “Correcting for the Missing Rich: An Application to Wealth Survey Data.” Review of Income and Wealth 62(4): 605–627. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12188.

  • European System of Accounts 1995 (ESA95). Council (EC) Regulation No 2223/96 of 25 June 1996 on the European system of national and regional accounts in the Community Official Journal of the European Union L 310/1-469. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:1996R2223:20030807:EN:PDF (accessed February 2019).

  • European system of accounts (ESA2010). Eurostat/European Commission Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg 2013. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5925693/KS-02-13-269-EN.PDF/44cd9d01-bc64-40e5-bd40-d17df0c69334 (accessed February 2019).

  • Gabaix X. and R. Ibragimov. 2011. “Rank -1/2: A Simple Way to Improve the OLS Estimation of Tail Exponents.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 29: 24–39. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1198/jbes.2009.06157.

  • Henriques A.M. and J.W. Hsu. 2014. “Analysis of Wealth Using Micro and Macro Data: A Comparison of the Survey of Consumer Finances and Flows of Funds Accounts.” In Measuring Economic Sustainability and Progress edited by D.W. Jorgenson J.S. Landefeld and P. Schreyer. University of Chicago Press.

  • IMF/FSB report to the G-20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors. Available at: http://www.financialstabilityboard.org/publications/r_091107e.pdf (accessed February 2019).

  • Kavonius I.K. and J. Honkkila. 2013. “Reconciling Micro and Macro Data on Household Wealth: A Test Based on Three Euro Area Countries.” Journal of Economic and Social Policy 15(2). Article 3. Available at: https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=592344712313054;res=IELBUS (accessed February 2019).

  • Kavonius I.K. and V.M. Törmälehto. 2010. “Integrating Micro and Macro Accounts – The Linkages between Euro Area Household Wealth Survey and Aggregate Balance Sheets for Households.” IARIW 31st General Conference St Gallen Switzerland August 22–28 2010. Available at: http://www.iariw.org/papers/2010/7akavonius.pdf (accessed February 2019).

  • Kennickell A.B. 2008. “The Role of Over-sampling of the Wealthy in the Survey of Consumer Finances.” Irving Fisher Committee Bulletin 28: 403–408. Available at: https://www.bis.org/ifc/publ/ifcb28.pdf#page=409 (accessed February 2019).

  • Kennickell A.B. and R.L. Woodburn. 1999. “Consistent Weight Design for the 1989 1992 and 1995 SCFs and the Distribution of Wealth.” Review of Income and Wealth 45(2): 193–215. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1999.tb00328.x.

  • Pérez-Duarte S. C. Sánchez-Muñoz and V.M. Törmälehto. 2010. “Re-weighting to reduce unit non-response bias in household wealth surveys: a cross-country comparative perspective illustrated by a case study.” In Conference on European Quality in Statistics Helsinki. Available at: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/home/pdf/research/hfcn/WealthSurveys.pdf (accessed February 2019).

  • Piketty T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.

  • Piketty T. E. Saez and G. Zucman. 2018. “Distributional national accounts: methods and estimates for the United States.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 133(2): 553–609. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx043.

  • Rubin D.B. 2004. “Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys.” John Wiley & Sons.

  • Saez E. and G. Zucman. 2016. “Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from Capitalized Income Tax Data.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131(2): 519–578. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw004.

  • Stiglitz J.E. A. Senand and J.P. Fitoussi. 2009. “Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.” Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/118025/118123/Fitoussi+Commission+report (accessed February 2019).

  • System of National Accounts 1993 (SNA93). Commission of the European Communities International Monetary Fund United Nations World Bank Brussels/Luxembourg New York Paris Washington D.C. 1993. Available at: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/docs/1993sna.pdf (accessed February 2019).

  • System of National Accounts 2008 (SNA2008). Commission of the European Communities International Monetary Fund United Nations World Bank New York 2009. Available at: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/docs/sna2008.pdf (accessed February 2019).

  • Tissot B. 2015. “Closing Information Gaps at the Global Level – What Micro Data Can Bring.” Irving Fisher Committee Workshop Warsaw 14–15 December 2015. Available at: https://www.bis.org/ifc/events/ws_micro_macro/tissot_paper.pdf (accessed February 2019).

  • Vermeulen P. 2016. “Estimating the Top Tail of the Wealth Distribution.” American Economic Review 106(5): 646–650. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161021.

  • Vermeulen P. 2018. “How Fat is the Top Tail of the Wealth Distribution?” Review of Income and Wealth 64(2): 357–387. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12279.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0,837
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0,934

CiteScore 2018: 1.04

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.963
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.020

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 505 505 91
PDF Downloads 395 395 13