[Calinescu, M., S. Bhulai, and B. Schouten. 2013. “Optimal Resource Allocation in Survey Designs.” European Journal of Operations Research 226(1): 115–121. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.10.046.10.1016/j.ejor.2012.10.046]Search in Google Scholar
[Calinescu, M. and B. Schouten. 2015. “Adaptive Survey Designs to Minimize Mode Effects. A Case Study on the Dutch Labour Force Survey.” Survey Methodology 41(2): 403–425.]Search in Google Scholar
[Calinescu, M. and B. Schouten. 2016. “Adaptive Survey Designs for Nonresponse and Measurement Error in Multi-Purpose Surveys.” Survey Research Methods 10(1): 35–47.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chun, Y. 2009. Nonparticipation of the 12th graders in the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Understanding Determinants of Nonresponse and Assessing the Impact on NAEP Estimates of Nonresponse Bias According to Propensity Models. University of Maryland, College Park, USA. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1903/9916 (accessed June 20, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Chun, Y. and M. Kwanisai. 2010. “A Response Propensity Modeling Navigator for Paradata.” In Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association, 356–369. Joint Statistical Meetings, Vancouver, Canada. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/SRMS/Proceedings/y2010/Files/306125_55196.pdf (accessed June 20, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Chun, Y. and M. Larsen. (forthcoming). Administrative Records for Survey Methodology, Edited book, Wiley Series in Survey Methodology, John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chun, Y. and F. Scheuren. 2011. “Pandata Systems to Enhance Survey and Census Systems: Employing Administrative Data to Better Inform Public Policy.” Invited Paper Presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings, Miami Beach, FL, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Couper, M.P. 1998. “Measuring Survey Quality in a CASIC Environment.” In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods of the American Statistical Association, Washington, DC.]Search in Google Scholar
[Couper, M.P. and F. Kreuter. 2012. “Using Paradata to Explore Item Level Response Times in Surveys.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 176: 271–286. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01041.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01041.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Fienberg, S.E. 1994. “Conflicts Between the Needs for Access to Statistical Information and Demands for Confidentiality.” Journal of Official Statistics 10: 115–132.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fienberg, S.E. and U.E. Makov. 1998. “Confidentiality, Uniqueness and Disclosure Limitation for Categorical Data.” Journal of Official Statistics 14: 385–397.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fienberg, S.E. and L.C.R.J. Willenborg. 1998. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Disclosure Limitation Methods for Protecting the Confidentiality of Statistical Data.” Journal of Official Statistics 14: 337–345.]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. and S.G. Heeringa. 2006. “Responsive Design for Household Surveys: Tools for Actively Controlling Survey Errors and Costs.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 169: 439–457. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. and E. Peytcheva. 2008. “The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias - a Meta-Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72(2): 167–189. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn011.10.1093/poq/nfn011]Search in Google Scholar
[Kreuter, F. 2013. Improving Surveys with Paradata. Analytic Use of Process Information. Edited book, Wiley Series in Survey Methodology, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118596869]Search in Google Scholar
[Laflamme, F. and M. Karaganis. 2010. “Implementation of Responsive Collection Design for CATI Surveys at Statistics Canada.” Paper presented at Q2010, 3–6 May, Helsinki, Finland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Little, R.J.A. 2006. “Calibrated Bayes: A Bayes/Frequentist Roadmap.” The American Statistician 60(3): 213–223. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1198/000313006X117837.10.1198/000313006X117837]Search in Google Scholar
[Nishimura, R., J. Wagner, and M.R. Elliott. 2016. “Alternative Indicators for the Risk of Non-Response Bias: A Simulation Study.” International Statistical Review 84(1): 43–62. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/insr.12100.10.1111/insr.12100487131627212786]Search in Google Scholar
[Nordbotten, S. 2010. “The Use of Administrative Data in Official Statistics - Past, Present, and Future - with Special Reference to the Nordic countries.” Official Statistics in Honour of Daniel Thorburn, 205–223. Norway.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peytchev, A., S. Riley, J. Rosen, J. Murphy, and M. Lindblad. 2010. “Reduction of Nonresponse Bias in Surveys Through Case Prioritization.” Survey Research Methods 4(1): 21–29.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., M. Calinescu, and A. Luiten. 2013. “Optimizing Quality of Response Through Adaptive Survey Designs.” Survey Methodology 39(1): 29–58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B. and N. Shlomo. 2017. “Selecting Adaptive Survey Design Strata with Partial R-Indicators.” International Statistical Review 85(1): 143–163. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/insr.12159.10.1111/insr.12159]Search in Google Scholar
[Tourangeau, R. 2017. “Mixing Modes: Tradeoffs among Coverage, Nonresponse, and Measurement Error.” In Total Survey Error in Practice, edited by P. Biemer, E. de Leeuw, S. Eckman, B. Edwards, F. Kreuter, L.E. Lyberg, N.C. Tucker, and B. West, New York: Wiley.10.1002/9781119041702.ch6]Search in Google Scholar
[Tourangeau, R., M. Brick, S. Lohr, and J. Li. 2016. “Adaptive and Responsive Survey Designs: a Review and Assessment.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 180: 203–223. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12186.10.1111/rssa.12186]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, J. 2008. “Adaptive Survey Design to Reduce Nonresponse Bias.” PhD thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, J. 2012. “A Comparison of Alternative Indicators for the Risk of Nonresponse Bias.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3): 555–575. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs032.10.1093/poq/nfs032627697530538342]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, J., J. Arrieta, H. Guyer, and M.B. Ofstedal. 2014. “Does Sequence Matter in Multimode Surveys: Results from an Experiment.” Field Methods 26(2): 141–155. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1525822X13491863.10.1177/1525822X13491863399248024764767]Search in Google Scholar
[Walejko, G. and J. Wagner. 2015. “Challenges to Innovation in Face-to-Face Surveys Posed by Interviewer Noncompliance.” Paper presented at the American Association for Public Opinion Research, May 14–17, Hollywood, FA, USA.]Search in Google Scholar