Coordination of Conditional Poisson Samples

Open access


Sample coordination seeks to maximize or to minimize the overlap of two or more samples. The former is known as positive coordination, and the latter as negative coordination. Positive coordination is mainly used for estimation purposes and to reduce data collection costs. Negative coordination is mainly performed to diminish the response burden of the sampled units. Poisson sampling design with permanent random numbers provides an optimum coordination degree of two or more samples. The size of a Poisson sample is, however, random. Conditional Poisson (CP) sampling is a modification of the classical Poisson sampling that produces a fixed-size πps sample. We introduce two methods to coordinate Conditional Poisson samples over time or simultaneously. The first one uses permanent random numbers and the list-sequential implementation of CP sampling. The second method uses a CP sample in the first selection and provides an approximate one in the second selection because the prescribed inclusion probabilities are not respected exactly. The methods are evaluated using the size of the expected sample overlap, and are compared with their competitors using Monte Carlo simulation. The new methods provide a good coordination degree of two samples, close to the performance of Poisson sampling with permanent random numbers.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aires N. 2000a. “Comparisons Between Conditional Poisson Sampling and Pareto πps sampling designs.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 82: 115.

  • Aires N. 2000b. Techniques to Calculate Exact Inclusion Probabilities for Conditional Poisson Sampling and Pareto πps Sampling Designs. Doctoral thesis. Chalmers University of Technology and Göteborg University Sweden. Available at: (accessed October 2015).

  • Arthnari T. and Y. Dodge. 1981. Mathematical Programming in Statistics. New York: Wiley.

  • Berger Y. 1998. “Rate of Convergence for Asymptotic Variance for the Horvitz-Thompson Estimator.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 74: 149–168. Doi:

  • Bondesson L. I. Traat and A. Lundqvist. 2006. “Pareto Sampling Versus Sampford and Conditional Poisson Sampling.” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 33: 699–720.

  • Brewer K. L. Early and S. Joyce. 1972. “Selecting Several Samples From a Single Population.” Australian Journal of Statistics 3: 231–239. Doi:

  • Broström G. and L. Nilsson. 2000. “Acceptance-Rejection Sampling From the Conditional Distribution of Independent Discrete Random Variables Given Their Sum.” Statistics 34: 247–257. Doi:

  • Causey B.D. L.H. Cox and L.R. Ernst. 1985. “Application of Transportation Theory to Statistical Problems.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 80: 903–909. Doi:

  • Chen S. A. Dempster and J. Liu. 1994. “Weighted Finite Population Sampling to Maximize Entropy.” Biometrika 81: 457–469. Doi:

  • Chen S. and J. Liu. 1997. “Statistical Applications of the Poisson-Binomial and Conditional Bernoulli Distributions.” Statistica Sinica 7: 875–892. Available at: (accessed October 2015).

  • Cotton F. and C. Hesse. 1992. Tirages Coordonnés d’Échantillons. Technical Report E9206 Direction des Statistiques Économiques INSEE Paris France.

  • Deville J.-C. 2000. Note Sur l’Algorithme de Chen Dempster et Liu. Technical Report CREST-ENSAI Rennes France.

  • Deville J.-C. and Y. Tillé. 2004. “Efficient Balanced Sampling: The Cube Method.” Biometrika 91: 893–912. Doi:

  • Dupacová J. 1979. “A Note on Rejective Sampling.” In Contributions to Statistics: Jaroslav Hájek Memorial Volume edited by J. Jurecková 71–78. Prague: Academia.

  • Ernst L.R. 1996. “Maximizing the Overlap of Sample Units For Two Designs With Simultaneous Selection.” Journal of Official Statistics 12: 33–45.

  • Ernst L.R. 1998. “Maximizing and Minimizing Overlap When Selecting a Large Number of Units per Stratum Simultaneously For Two Designs.” Journal of Official Statistics 14: 297–314.

  • Ernst L.R. 1999. “The Maximization and Minimization of Sample Overlap Problems: a Half Century of Results.” Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute Proceedings Tome LVIII Book 2 293–296.

  • Ernst L.R. and M.M. Ikeda. 1995. “A Reduced-size Transportation Algorithm For Maximizing the Overlap Between Surveys.” Survey Methodology 21: 147–157.

  • Ernst L.R. and S.P. Paben. 2002. “Maximizing and Minimizing Overlap When Selecting Any Number of Units Per Stratum Simultaneously For Two Designs With Different Stratications.” Journal of Official Statistics 18: 185–202.

  • Fattorini L. 2006. “Applying the Horvitz-Thompson Criterion In Complex Designs: a Computer-intensive Perspective for Estimating Inclusion Probabilities.” Biometrika 93: 269–278. Doi:

  • Fattorini L. 2009. “An Adaptive Algorithm For Estimating Inclusion Probabilities and Performing the Horvitz-Thompson Criterion In Complex Designs.” Computational Statistics 24: 623–639. Doi:

  • Grafström A. 2010. “Entropy of Unequal Probability Sampling Designs.” Statistical Methodology 7: 84–97. Doi:

  • Hájek J. 1964. “Asymptotic Theory of Rejective Sampling With Varying Probabilities From a Finite Population.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 35: 1491–1523.

  • Hájek J. 1981. Sampling from a Finite Population. New York: Marcel Dekker.

  • Haziza D. F. Mecatti and J.N.K. Rao. 2008. “Evaluation of Some Approximate Variance Estimators Under the Rao-Sampford Unequal Probability Sampling Design.” METRON - International Journal of Statistics LXVI: 91–108. Available at: (accessed October 2015).

  • Keytz N. 1951. “Sampling With Probabilities Proportional to Size: Adjustment For Changes In the Probabilities.” Journal of American Statistics Association 46: 105–109. Doi:

  • Kish L. and A. Scott. 1971. “Retaining Units After Changing Strata and Probabilites.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 66: 461–470. Doi:

  • Mach L. P.T. Reiss and I. Schiopu-Kratina. 2006. “Optimizing the Expected Overlap of Survey Samples Via the Northwest Corner Rule.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 101: 1671–1679. Doi:

  • Matei A. and C. Skinner. 2009. “Optimal Sample Coordination Using Controlled Selection.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 139: 3112–3121. Doi:

  • Matei A. and Y. Tillé. 2005a. “Evaluation of Variance Approximations and Estimators In Maximum Entropy Sampling With Unequal Probability and Mixed Sample Size.” Journal of Official Statistics 21: 543–570.

  • Matei A. and Y. Tillé. 2005b. “Maximal and Minimal Sample Co-ordination.” Sankhyā 67: 590–612.

  • Nedyalkova D. J. Pea and Y. Tillé. 2008. “Sampling Procedures For Coordinating Stratified Samples: Methods Based On Microstrata.” International Statistical Review 76: 368–386. Doi:

  • Nedyalkova D. L. Qualité and Y. Tillé. 2009. “General Framework For the Rotation of Units In Repeated Survey Sampling.” Statistica Neerlandica 63: 269–293. Doi:

  • Ohlsson E. 1995. “Coordination of Samples Using Permanent Random Numbers.” In Business Survey Methods edited by B.G. Cox D.A. Binder B.N. Chinnapa A. Christianson M.J. Colledge and P.S. Kott. 153–169. New York: Wiley.

  • Ohlsson E. 1998. “Sequential Poisson Sampling.” Journal of Official Statistics 14: 149–162.

  • Ohlsson E. 2000. Coordination of PPS Samples Over Time. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Establishment Surveys June 17–21 2000 Buffalo New York. 255–264. Alexandria VA: American Statistical Association.

  • Raj D. 1968. Sampling Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Rosén B. 1991. Variance estimation for systematic pps-sampling. Technical Report 1991:15 Statistics Sweden.

  • Rosén B. 1997a. “Asymptotic Theory For Order Sampling.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 62: 135–158. Doi:

  • Rosén B. 1997b. “On Sampling With Probability Proportional To Size.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 62: 159–191. Doi:

  • Rosén B. 2000. “On Inclusion Probabilties For Order πps Sampling.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 90: 117–143. Doi:

  • Saavedra P. 1995. “Fixed Sample Size PPS Approximations With a Permanent Random Number.” In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods August 13–17 1995 Orlando Florida. 697–700. Alexandria VA: American Statistical Association.

  • Schiopu-Kratina I. J.M. Fillion L. Mach and P.T. Reiss. 2014. “Maximizing the Conditional Overlap in Business Surveys.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 149: 98–115. Doi:

  • Särndal C.-E. B. Swensson and J. Wretman. 1992. Model Assisted Survey Sampling. New York: Springer.

  • Thompson M.E. and C. Wu. 2008. “Simulation-based Randomized Systematic PPS Sampling Under Substitution of Units.” Survey Methodology 34: 3–10. Available at: (assessed October 2015).

  • Tillé Y. 2006. Sampling Algorithms. New York: Springer.

  • Tillé Y. and D. Haziza. 2010. “An Interesting Property of the Entropy of Some Sampling Designs.” Survey Methodology 36: 229–231. Available at: (accessed October 2015).

  • Traat I. L. Bondesson and K. Meister. 2004. “Sampling Design and Sample Selection Through Distribution Theory.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 123: 395–413. Doi:

Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.837
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.934

CiteScore 2018: 1.04

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.963
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.020

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 226 127 2
PDF Downloads 136 95 1