Quality Indicators of the Pre-Analytical Phase

Open access

Quality Indicators of the Pre-Analytical Phase

Quality indicators are tools that allow the quantification of quality in each of the segments of health care in comparison with selected criteria. They can be defined as an objective measure used to assess the critical health care segments such as, for instance, patient safety, effectiveness, impartiality, timeliness, efficiency, etc. In laboratory medicine it is possible to develop quality indicators or the measure of feasibility for any stage of the total testing process. The total process or cycle of investigation has traditionally been separated into three phases, the pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical phase. Some authors also include a »pre-pre« and a »post-post« analytical phase, in a manner that allows to separate them from the activities of sample collection and transportation (pre-analytical phase) and reporting (post-analytical phase). In the year 2008 the IFCC formed within its Education and Management Division (EMD) a task force called Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety (WG-LEPS) with the aim of promoting the investigation of errors in laboratory data, collecting data and developing a strategy to improve patient safety. This task force came up with the Model of Quality Indicators (MQI) for the total testing process (TTP) including the pre-, intra- and post-analytical phases of work. The pre-analytical phase includes a set of procedures that are difficult to define because they take place at different locations and at different times. Errors that occur at this stage often become obvious later in the analytical and post-analytical phases. For these reasons the identification of quality indicators is necessary in order to avoid potential errors in all the steps of the pre-analytical phase.

Institute of Medicine Committee to Design Strategy for Quality Review and Assurance in Medicare. Medicare: A Strategy for Quality Assurance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. National Quality Measures Clearinghouse: desirable measure attributes. http://www.qualytymeasures.ahrq.gov/resources/measure_use.aspx#attributes

Lundberg GD. Acting on significant laboratory results. JAMA 1981; 245: 1762-3.

Lundberg GD. How clinicians should use the diagnostic laboratory in a changing medical world. Clin Chim Acta 1999; 280: 3-11.

Plebani M, Lippi G. Closing the brain-to-brain loop in laboratory testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 49: 1131-3.

Laposata M, Dighe A. »Pre-pre« and post-post« analytical error: high-incidence patients safety hazards involving the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007; 45: 712-19.

Leape LL. Errors in medicine. Clin Chim Acta 2009; 404: 2-5.

Leape LL. Striving for perfection. Clin Chem 2002; 48: 1871-2.

Kalra J. Medical errors: impact on clinical laboratories and other critical areas. Clin Biochem 2004; 37: 1952-62.

Plebani M. Exploring the iceberg of errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chim Acta 2009; 404: 16-23.

Bonini P, Plebani M, Ceriotti F, Rubboli F. Errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem 2002; 48: 691-8.

Plebani M. The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine. Ann Clin Biochem 2010; 47: 101-10.

ISO 9001:2008. Quality management systems. Requirements.

ISO 15189:2007. Medical laboratories - particular requirements for quality and competence.

Kohn KT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. Institute of Medicine: To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.

Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health Care System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.

Consumers Union. To Err is Human - To Delay is Deadly. Available at: http://www.safepatientproject.org/2009/05/to_err_is_humanto_delay-is-dea-html

Hilborne LH, Lubin IM, Scheuner MT. The beginning of the second decade of the era of patient safety: implications and roles for the clinical laboratory and laboratory professionals. Clin Chim Acta 2009; 404: 24-7.

Howanitz PJ. Errors in laboratory medicine: practical lessons to improve patients safety. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005; 129: 1252-61.

Raab SS. Improving patients safety through quality assurance. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006; 130: 633-7.

Sciacovelli L, Plebani M. The IFCC Working Group on laboratory errors and patients safety. Clin Chim Acta 2009; 404: 79-85.

Sciacovelli L, O'Kane M, Skaik AY, Caciagli P, Pellegrini C, Da Rin G, Ivanov A, Glys T, Plebani M. Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 49: 836-44.

Van Walravan C, Raymond M. Population-based study of repeat laboratory testing. Clin Chem 2003; 49: 1997-2005.

Lippi G, Guidi GC, Mattiuzzi C, Plebani M. Preanalytical variability: the dark side of the moon in laboratory testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006; 44: 358-65.

Lipi G, Banfi G, Buttarello M, Ceriotti F, Davis M, Dolci A, Caputo M, Giavarina D, Montagnana M, Micvoni V, Milanesi B, Mosca A, Morandini M, Salvagno GL. Recommendations for detection and management of unsuitable samples in clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007; 45: 728-36.

Llopis AM, Alvarez V, Martinez-Bru C, Gomez R, Barba N, et al. Quality Assurance in the Preanalytical Phase, Applications and Experiences of Quality Control, Ognyan Ivanov (Rd.), ISBN: 978-953-307-236-4, InTech, 2011.

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (Formerly NCCLS). Urinanalysis; Approved Standard (Vol. 29, No. 4) CLSI document GP16-A3 (ISSN-0273-23099). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. West Valley Road, Pennsylvania, USA.

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (Formerly NCCLS). Procedure for the Handling and Transport of Diagnostic Specimens and Etiologic Agents (1994) - Third Edition; Approved Standard (Vol. 14, No. 7) CLSI document H5-A3 (ISSN-0273-23099). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. West Valley Road, Pennsylvania, USA.

Gomez R, Alsina MJ, Alvarez V, Barba N, Cortes M, Llopis MA, Martinez-Bru C. Hemolisis en las muestras para diagnosico. Rev Lab Clin 2009; 2: 185-95.

Da Rin G. Pre-analytical workstations as a tool for reducing laboratory errors. Journal of Medical Biochemistry 2010; 29: 315-24.

Valid J-M. Progressive automation - The solution of choice for improving lab efficiency. Journal of Medical Biochemistry 2010; 29: 325-9.

Halwachs-Baumann G. Concepts for lean laboratory organization. Journal of Medical Biochemistry 2010; 29: 330-8.

Da Rin G. Pre-analytical workstations: a tool for reducing laboratory errors. Clin Chem Acta 2009; 404: 68-74.

Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Blanckaert N, Giavarina D, Green S, Kitchen S, Palicka V, Vassault AJ, Plebani M. Multicenter evaluation of the hemolysis index in automated clinical chemistry systems. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009; 47: 934-9.

Kenny D, Fraser CG, Hyltoft Petersen P, Kallner A. Strategies to set global analytical quality specifications in laboratory medicine - Consensus agreement. Scan J Clin Lab Invest 1999; 59: 585.

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, formerly NCCLS) (2009). Development and Use of Quality Indicators for Process Improvement and Monitoring of Laboratory Quality; Proposed Guidelines. CLSI document GP35-P. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, West Valley Road, Wayne, Pennsylvania, USA.

Romero A, Munoz M, Ramos JR, Campos A, Ramirez G. Identification of preanalytical mistakes in the stat section of the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med 2005; 43: 974-5.

Shahangian S, Snyder RS. Laboratory Medicine Quality Indicators. Am J Clin Pathol 2009; 131: 418-31.

Hawkins R. Managing the Pre- and Post-analytical Phases of the Total Testing Process. Ann Lab Med 201; 32: 5-16.

Lippi G, Chance JJ, Church S, Dazzi P, Fontana R, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement: from dream to reality. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 49: 1113-26.

Villa D. Automation, Lean, Six Sigma: Synergies for improving laboratory efficiency. Journal of Medical Biochemistry 2010; 29: 339-48.

Journal of Medical Biochemistry

The Journal of Society of Medical Biochemists of Serbia

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.378
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.704



CiteScore 2017: 1.05

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.307
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.532

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 351 351 56
PDF Downloads 117 117 20