Experimental Phonetics and Phonology in Indo-Aryan & European Languages

Open access

Abstract

Phonetics and phonology are very interesting areas of Linguistics, and are interrelated. They are based on the human speech system, speech perception, native speakers’ intuition, and vocalic and consonantal systems of languages spoken in this world. There are more than six thousand languages spoken in the world. Every language has its own phonemic inventory, sound system, and phonological and phonetic rules that differ from other languages; most even have distinct orthographic systems. While languages spoken in developed countries are well-studied, those spoken in underdeveloped countries are not. There is a great need to examine them using a scientific approach. These under-studied languages need to be documented scientifically using advanced technological instruments to bring objective results, and linguistics itself provides the scientific basis for the study of a language. Most research studies to date have also been carried out with reference to old or existing written literature in poetry and drama. In the current era of research, scholars are looking for objective scientific approaches, e.g., experimental and instrumental studies that include acoustic research on the sound systems of less privileged languages spoken locally in developing countries. In this context, Sindhi is an example of this phenomenon, and un-researched with reference to syllable structure and the exponents of lexical stress patterns.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abbasi A. M. (2010). The production of English consonants by Sindhi ESL learners. Munich. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller. Germany.

  • Abbasi A. M. (2012). A phonetic-acoustic study of Sindhi-accented English for better English pronunciation. International Journal of Social Sciences & Education 2(2) 146-157.

  • Abbasi A. M. (2017). The stress pattern of Sindhi and English. Munich. Lincom Europa Germany.

  • Abbasi A. M. & Hussain S. (2012). Syllable structure and syllabification in Sindhi-English loanwords. International Journal of Researchers 1(4) 120-134.

  • Abbasi A. M. & Hussain S. (2015). Phonetic analysis of lexical stress in Sindhi. Sindh University Research Journal 47(4) 749-756.

  • Abbasi A. M. & Hussain S. (2015). The role of pitch between stress and intonation in Sindhi. Annual Research Journal of English Language Forum 17 9-24.

  • Abbasi A. M. & Kimball A. (2014). Word stress in Sindhi and English: Implications for learners of English. In poster session presented at the meeting of Sixth Annual Second Language Acquisition and Teacher Education (SLATE) Graduate Research Symposium. Department of linguistics & foreign languages University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign USA.

  • Abbasi A. M. Channa M. A. John S. Memon. M. A. Anwar R. (2018). An Acoustic Investigation of Pakistani and American English Vowels. International Journal of English Linguistics 8(4) 115-121. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n4p115

  • Abbasi A. M. Channa M. A. Kakepoto I. Ali R. & Mehmood M. (2017). A perceptual study of phonological variations in Pakistani English. International Journal of English Linguistics 8 91-100. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n2p92

  • Abbasi A. M. Memon M. A. Channa M. A. & Stephen J. (2018). Awareness of L2 American English word stress: Implications for teaching speakers of Indo-Aryan languages. International Journal of English Linguistics 8(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n3p101

  • Allana G.A. (1996). Papers on Sindhi language and linguistics (1st ed.). Jamshoro Pakistan: Institute of Sindhology University of Sindh.

  • Allana G.A. (2009). Sindhi phonetics (2nd ed.). Hyderabad Pakistan: Sindhi Language Authority.

  • Ashby M. & Maidment J. (2008). Introducing phonetic science. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Beckman M. (1986). Stress and non-stress accent. Dordrecht Netherlands: Foris Publications.

  • Beckman M. & Pierrehumbert J. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 3 255-309.

  • Beckman M. & G. Ayers Elam. (1993). Guidelines for ToBI labelling. Columbus: Ohio State University Research Foundation. Retrieved from http://docplayer.net/8594926-Guidelines-for-tobi-labelling-version-3-0-march-1997-by-mary-e-beckman-and-gayle-ayers-elam.html

  • Boersma P. & Weenink D. (2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.69) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/

  • Bosch A. R. K. (2011). Syllable-internal structure: The Blackwell Companion to Phonology.

  • Broselow E. (1992). Transfer and universals in second language epenthesis. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.) Language transfer in language learning. Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins.

  • Broselow E. (1999). Loanwords and learn-ability. [Handout of a talk given at the University of Maryland]. Retrieved from http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/491-0102/491-0102-gouskova-0-0.pdf

  • Bughio M. Q. (2001-2004). A comparative study of socio-linguistics of Sindhi (Pakistani ed.). Germany: Lincom Europe.

  • Bukhari & Pervez. (2000-2002). Syllabification & re-syllabification in Urdu. In CRULP Annual Student Report 2001-2002. Center for Research in Urdu Language Processing. Retrieved from http://www.cle.org.pk/resources/reports/streport02.htm#script

  • Carr P. (2008). A glossary of phonology. Edinburgh UK: Edinburgh University Press.

  • Cole J. (2001). Sindhi. In J. Garry & C. Rubino (Eds.) Facts about the world’s languages: An encyclopedia of the world’s major languages past and present (pp. 647-653). New York NY: The H.W. Wilson Company.

  • Cole J. (2005). Sindhi. In P. Strazny (Ed.) Encyclopedia of linguistics. New York NY: Routledge.

  • Cole J. (2006). The Sindhi language. In K. Brown (Ed.) Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed. electronic version Vol. 2 pp.384-386). Oxford UK: Elsevier. Retrieved from http://www.linguistics.uiuc.edu/jscole/Sindhi%20work.htm

  • Crosswhite K. M. (2001a). Vowel reduction. In Phonetically based phonology (B. Hayes R. Kirchner & D. Steriade editors) (pp. 191-231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Crosswhite K. M. (2001b). Stress placement in Dihovo Macedonian. Ms. U. of Rochester.

  • Crystal D. (1997). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (4th ed.). Cornwall England: MPG Book Ltd.

  • Crystal D. (2008). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th ed.). ISBN: 978-1-405-15296-9.

  • Davenport M. & Hannahs. S. J. (1998). Introducing phonetics and phonology. London UK: Arnold.

  • De Lacy P. (2007). The interaction of tone sonority and prosodic structure. In Paul de Lacy (Ed.) The Cambridge handbook of phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ch.12 (pp. 281-307).

  • Dixon R. M. W. (1977). A grammar of Yidin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Dogil G. (1995). Phonetic correlates of word stress. Arbeitspapiere des Instituts für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung - Phonetik Universität Stuttgart2 (2) 1-60.

  • Dogil G. & Williams B. (1999). The phonetic manifestation of word stress. In Word prosodic systems in the languages of Europe (H. van der Hulst editor) (pp. 273-334). Berlin New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Duanmu S. Kim Y. & Stiennon. N. (2005). Stress and syllable structure in English: Approaches to phonological variations. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 3.2 45-78. Retrieved from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~duanmu/Variations05.pdf

  • Dyrud L. (1997). Hindi-Urdu: Stress accent or non-stress accent? (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of North Dakota Grand Forks ND. Retrieved from https://arts-sciences.und.edu/summer-institute-of-linguistics/theses/_files/docs/2001-dyrud-lars.pdf

  • Feinstein M. (1979). Pre-nasalization and syllable structure. Linguistic Inquiry (10) 245–278.

  • Flemming E. (2002). Auditory representations in phonology. Routledge New York.

  • Flemming Edward (2005). Target less schwa revisited. Poster presented at the 149th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America Vancouver.

  • Fleischhacker H. (2000). The location of epenthetic vowels with respect to consonant clusters: An auditory similarity account (Unpublished master’s thesis). UCLA Los Angelos CA.

  • Fry D. (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27 765-8.

  • Fry D. (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech 1 120-52.

  • Fujisaki H. & Hirose K. (1984). Analysis of voice fundamental frequency contours for declarative sentences of Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan5 233-242.

  • Gay T. (1978). Effect of speaking rate on vowel formant movements. The Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 63 223-230.

  • Giegrich H. J. (1998). English phonology (4th ed.). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Gordon M. (1999). Syllable weight: Phonetics phonology and typology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). UCLA Los Angelos CA.

  • Gordon M. (2002a). A phonetically-driven account of syllable weight. Language 78 51-80.

  • Gordon M. (2002b). Weight-by-position adjunction and syllable structure. Lingua 112 901-931.

  • Gordon M. (2004). A phonological and phonetic study of word-level stress in Chickasaw. International Journal of American Linguistics 70 1-32.

  • Gordon M. (2005). A perceptually-driven account of onset-sensitive stress. University of California Santa Barbara. Journal of Springer Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23 595–653. DOI 10.1007/s11049-004-8874-9

  • Gordon M Carmen J Carlos N and Nobutaka T. (2008). Vowel and consonant sonority and coda weight: A cross-linguistic study. In Proceedings of the 26th West coast conference on formal linguistics (ed.) Charles B. Chang and Hannah J. Haynie 208-216. Somerville MA: Cascadilla proceedings project. www.lingref.com document 1674.

  • Gordon M. (2010). Disentangling stress and pitch accent: A typology of prominence at different prosodic levels. Paper presented at the University of Connecticut workshop on stress and accent Storrs CT.

  • Gordon M J Nash & Takara. (2010). Syllable structure and extrametricality: A typological and phonetic study. Studies in Language 34 (1) 131-166.

  • Gordon M. (2011). Stress: Phonotactic and phonetic evidence. In M. van Ostendorp C.J. Ewen E. Hume & K. Rice (Eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Phonology (pp. 924-948). Oxford UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Gordon M & Latifa N. (2012). Acoustic correlates of prominence in Tashlhiyt Berber. University of California Santa Barbar. Retrieved from http://www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/faculty/gordon/Gordon&Nafi_2012_Tashlhiyt.pdf

  • Gouskova M. (2001). Falling sonority onsets loanwords and syllable contact. In

  • M. Andronis C. Ball H. Elston & S. Neuvel (Eds.) CLS 37: Papers from the 37th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Vol. 1: The main session. Chicago: CLS.

  • Gussenhoven C. & Jacobs H. (2003). Understanding phonology (1st ed.). London UK: Hodder Arnold.

  • Halle M. & Vergnaud J. R. (1987). An essay on stress. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Harrington J. & Cox F. (1984b). The syllable and phonotactic constraints. In the syllable and the foot [Course material]. Retrieved from http://clas.mq.edu.au/phonetics/phonology/syllable/syllable.pdf

  • Haugen E. (1956). Syllabification in Kutenai. International Journal of American Linguistics (22) 196-201.

  • Hawkins P. (1992). Introducing phonology (2nd ed.). London UK: Hutchinson.

  • Hayes B. (1981). A metrical theory of stress rules (Revised version of 1980 doctoral dissertation Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club Bloomington IN.

  • Hayes B. (1982). Extrametricality and English stress. Linguistic Inquiry 13 (2) 227-276.

  • Hayes B. (1985). Iambic and Trochaic Rhythm in Stress Rules: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 429-446). Retrieved from http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/bls/

  • Hayes B. (1995). Metrical stress theory. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Hillenbrand J. Laura A. Getty Clark M. J & Wheeler K (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Acoustical Society of America 97 (5). Retrieved from http://homepages.wmich.edu/~hillenbr/Papers/HillenbrandGettyClarkWheeler.pdf

  • Hualde J. (1991). Basque phonology. London UK: Routledge.

  • Hualde J. (1999). Basque accentuation. In van der Hulst H. (Ed.) Word prosodic systems in the languages of Europe (pp.947-993). Berlin Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Hussain S. (2005). Phonological processing for Urdu text to speech system. Retrieved from http://www.cle.org.pk/research/papers.htm

  • Hussain S. (2010). Phonetic correlates of lexical stress in Urdu (Doctoral dissertation Northwest University USA). Islamabad. National Language Authority Pakistan.

  • Hyman L. M. (1977). On the nature of linguistic stress. In Larry M. Hyman (Ed.) Studies in stress and accent 37-82. SCOPIL #4. Los Angeles: University of Southern California. http://gsil.scling.org/list.html#SCOPIL:_Southern_California_Occasional_

  • Isačenko A. & Schädlich H. J. (1970). A model of standard German intonation. The Hague Paris: Mouton.

  • Itô J. (1989). A prosodic theory of epenthesis. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory7 (2) 217-259. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4047731 International Phonetic Associations. (1999). Handbook of the international phonetic association. Washington: DC.

  • Jatoi N. A. (1983). Linguistics and Sindhi language (2nd ed.). Hyderabad Pakistan: Institute of Sindhology.

  • Jatoi N. A (1996). Linguistics and Sindhi language (Ilm Lisan Ain Sindhi Zaban) (3rd ed.). Hyderabad Pakistan: Institute of Sindhology Sindh University Press.

  • Jones D. (1972). An outline of English phonetics (9th ed.). Cambridge UK: Heffer & Sons.

  • Kabak B. & Vogel I. (2001). The phonological word and stress assignment in Turkish. Phonology 18 315-360.

  • Kachru Y. (2006). Hindi. (London oriental and African language library Vol. 12). Amsterdam the Netherlands: John Benjamin Publishing Company.

  • Kager R. (1989). A metrical theory of stress and destressing in English and Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris.

  • (1992a) Shapes of the generalized trochee. In J. Mead (ed.) Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 11 298-311.

  • Keerio A. (2010). Acoustic analysis of Sindhi speech-pre-curser for an ASR system (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Sussex Brighton UK.

  • Kenstowicz M. (1994). Phonology in generative grammar (2nd ed.). Cambridge MA: Blackwell Publishers.

  • Kidder E. (2008). Tone intonation stress and duration in Navajo. Coyote Papers: Working Papers in Linguistics Linguistic Theory at the University of Arizona. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10150/126405

  • Kleber F. & Klipphahn N. (n.d.). An acoustic investigation of secondary stress in

  • German: Institute of phonetics and digital speech processing Christian-Albrechts University Kiel Germany. Retrieved from http://www.ipds.unikiel.de/pub_exx/aipuk/aipuk_37/37_1_KleberKlipphahn.pdf

  • Kochanski G. Grabe E. Coleman J. & Rosner B. (2005). Loudness predicts prominence: fundamental frequency lends little. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118 (2)1038-1054. Retrieved from http://www.ling.upenn.edu/courses/Fall_2007/cogs501/Kochanski2005.pdf

  • Ladd D. R. (1996). Intonational phonology. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Ladefoged P. (2001). A course in phonetics (4th ed.). Los Angelos CA: Harcourt

  • College Publishers.

  • Ladefoged P. & Maddieson I. (1996). The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford UK: Blackwell Publishers.

  • Lewis M. P Gary F.S & Charles D. F (eds.) (2016). Ethnologue: Languages of the world nineteenth edition. Dallas Texas: SIL International. Oneline version: http://www.ethnologue.com.

  • Lindblom B. (1963). Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. The Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 35 1773-1781.

  • McDonough J. (2003). The Navajo sound system. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • McMahon A. (2002). An introduction to English phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Mehrotra R. C. (1965). Stress in Hindi. Indian Linguistics 26.

  • Masica C. P. (1991). The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge University Press Great Britain.

  • Moore R. R. (1965). A study of Hindi intonation (Doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan.

  • Nair R. (1999). Syllables and word edges (Doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University Evanston IL.

  • Nair. R. (2001). Acoustic correlates of lexical stress in Hindi: Papers from the Proceedings of SALA 18th Roundtable (1st ed.). Motilal Banarsidas.

  • Nayyar S. (2000-2001). Syllable stress in Urdu. In CRULP Annual Student Report (pp. 202-206). Center for Research in Urdu Language Processing. Retrieved from http://www.cle.org.pk/resources/reports/streport02.htm#script

  • Nihalani P. (1995). Illustrations of the IPA: Sindhi. Journal of the International Phonetic Association25 (2) 95-98.

  • Parker S. (2002). Quantifying the sonority hierarchy (Doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts Amherst MA.

  • Parker S. (2011). Sonority. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. In van Ostendorp Marc Colin J. Ewen Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (Eds.) Blackwell Publishing.

  • Retrieved from http://www.companiontophonology.com/subscriber/tocnode?id=g9781405184236_chunk_g978140518423651

  • Parsons T. W. (1987). Voice and speech processing. New York. NY: McGraw-Hill.

  • Pickett J. M. (1999). The acoustics of speech communication fundamentals speech perception theory and technology USA.

  • Pierrehumbert J. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation (Doctoral dissertation). MIT Cambridge.

  • Pierrehumbert J. & Nair R. (1996). Implication of Hindi prosodic structure. In J. Durand & B. Laks (Eds.) Current trends in phonology: Models and Methods 2 549-584. Retrieved from http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/~jbp/publications/implications_hindi.pdf

  • PIE. (2000). Introduction to proto-Indo-European stress. Retrieved from http://www.oocities.org/caraculiambro/Caraculiambro/Stress.html

  • Puri V. (2013). Intonation in Indian English and Hindi late and simultaneous bilinguals (Doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Champaign IL.

  • Raphael L. J. Gloria J. B. & Katherine S. H. (2006). Speech science primer: physiology acoustics and perception of speech (5th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

  • Reetz H. & Jongman A. (2009). Phonetics. Oxford UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Roach P. (2004). English phonetics and phonology. India: Replika Press.

  • Sapir E. & Swadesh M. (1960). Yana dictionary (University of California publications in linguistics Vol. 22). Berkeley CA: University of California Press.

  • Singh R. (1985). Prosodic adaptation in inter-phonology. Lingua67 269-282.

  • Wang H. & Heuven V. (2006). Acoustical analysis of English vowels produced by Chinese Dutch and American speakers. In J. M. Van de Weijer & B. Los (Eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands (pp. 237-248). Amsterdam the Netherlands/Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins. Retrieved from https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/8597/05.pdf?sequence=15

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 281 155 6
PDF Downloads 421 378 37