Second Language Acquisition of the English Dative Alternation by Native Speakers of Arabic

Open access


This paper reports on an experimental study that investigates the influence of the disparity between English and Arabic on second language acquisition, namely the phenomenon of the acquisition of the English dative alternation by Arab learners. The disallowance of certain Arabic verbs to occur in the double object dative structure causes difficulty for Arab learners to acquire English as far as the acquisition of the dative alternation is concerned. The experiment is devised to examine whether Arab learners are sensitive to syntactic and semantic properties associated with the English dative alternation. The experiment involved picture tasks with two structures: the prepositional dative structure and the double object dative structure. Overall, the results of the experiment show that the L2 learners failed to acquire the double object dative structure which does not exist in their L1. Based on these results, it is argued that L1 has an important effect on the acquisition of L2.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Den Dikken M. (1995). Particles: On the syntax of verb-particle triadic and causative constructions Oxford University Press on Demand.

  • Gass S. M. & Selinker L. (1983). Language Transfer in Language Learning. Issues in Second Language Research ERIC.

  • Gil K. H. & Marsden H. (2013). Existential quantifiers in second language acquisition: A feature reassembly account. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3(2) 117-149.

  • Goad H. & White L. (2006). Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: A prosodic approach. Second Language Research 22 243-268.

  • Goldberg A. (1995). Constructions: A Construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Goldberg A. E. (1999). The emergence of the semantics of argument structure constructions. The emergence of language 197-212.

  • Green G. M. (1974). Semantics and syntactic regularity Indiana University Press.

  • Gropen J. Pinker S. Hollander M. Goldberg R. & Wilson R. 1989. The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language 203-257.

  • Hamdan J. (1997). The acquisition of the dative alternation UG markedness or L1 transfer? Dirasat. Human and social sciences 24.

  • Hawkins R. (1987). Markedness and the acquisition of the English dative alternation by L2 speakers. Second Language Research 3 20-55.

  • Ibn S-Saraaj M. B. S. (1996). Al-Aušool fi Al-Nahwi Beirut Al-Resalah Publishers.

  • Inagaki S. (1997). Japanese and Chinese Learners' Acquisition of the Narrow‐ Range Rules for the Dative Alternation in English. Language Learning 47 637-669.

  • Jarvis S. & Pavlenko A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition Routledge.

  • Lardiere D. (2008). Feature assembly in second language acquisition. In: Liceras J Zobl H and Goodluck H. (eds) The role of formal features in second language acquisition. New York:Lawrence Erlbaum 106-40.

  • Lardiere D. (2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research 25: 173-227.

  • Lardiere D. (2013). Linguistic approaches to second language morphosyntax. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 106-126). Routledge.

  • Larson R. K. (1988). On the double object construction. Linguistic inquiry 335-391.

  • Lefebvre C. White L. & Jourdan C. 2006. L2 acquisition and Creole genesis: dialogues John Benjamins Publishing.

  • Mazurkewich I. (1984). The acquisition of the dative alternation by second language learners and linguistic theory. Language learning 34 91-108.

  • Mazurkewich I. (1985). Syntactic markedness and language acquisition. Studies in second language acquisition 7 15-35.

  • Miyagawa S. & Tsujioka T. (2004). Argument structure and ditransitive verbs in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13 1-38.

  • Oehrle R. T. (1976). The grammatical status of the English dative alternation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Oh E. (2010). Recovery from first-language transfer: The second language acquisition of English double objects by Korean speakers. Second Language Research 26 407-439.

  • Pinker S. (1989). Learnability and cognition : the acquisition of argument structure Cambridge Mass. MIT Press.

  • Sawyer M. (1996). L1 and L2 sensitivity to semantic constraints on argument structure. Proceedings of the 20th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development 1996. 646-657.

  • Schwartz B. D. & Sprouse R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second language research 12 40-72.

  • Sorace A. (1993). Incomplete vs. divergent representations of unaccusativity in non native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research 9 22-47.

  • Tomasello M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development Cambridge University Press.

  • Tomasello M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition 74 209-253.

  • White L. (1991). Argument structure in second language acquisition. Journal of French Language Studies 1 189-207.

  • Whong-Barr M. & Schwartz B. D.(2002). Morphological and syntactic transfer in child L2 acquisition of the English dative alternation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24 579-616.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 288 189 9
PDF Downloads 174 152 10