The main aim of this research was to investigate metacognitive strategies through reading comprehension practice by first year students of engineering departments. The students of four engineering departments were selected as the participants in this research work. The qualitative instrument based on focus group interview was used for collecting data from first year students of four engineering departments to know the perceptions and their needs to develop reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. The researchers developed interview questions for this study. These questions were validated by two experts of faculty of cognitive science and human development at university Malaysia Sarawak. The researchers obtained permission from the chairmen of four departments at a university in Pakistan. Almost 8 groups consisting of 5 informants in each participated in this research. The data was documented by using audio-tape; NVivo software, version 8 was used to organize data for obtaining main themes of the study. This research generated the most important themes for the interpretation of the results. The study contributed the most promising results which revealed that more than half of these groups used metacognitive strategies in classroom reading practice while less than half of groups did not use strategies and remained poor in reading comprehension. This research suggested administrators, teachers, and curriculum designers to design and implement reading comprehension courses and syllabus for first year engineering students.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Ballou A.K. (2012). Using explicit strategy instruction to improve reading comprehension. Education Masters Paper 221.
Boulware-Gooden R. Carreker S. Thornhill A. & Joshi R. (2007). Instruction of metacognitive strategies enhances reading comprehension and vocabulary achievement of third-grade students. Reading Teacher 61(1) 70-77 doi:
Boulware-Gooden, R., Carreker, S., Thornhill, A., & Joshi, R. (2007). Instruction of metacognitive strategies enhances reading comprehension and vocabulary achievement of third-grade students. Reading Teacher, 61(1), 70-77, doi: 10.1598/RT.61.1.7)| false
Brown A. (1987). Metacognition executive control self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In Weinert F. & Kluwe R. (Eds.) Metacognition motivation and understanding (pp. 65-116) Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Channa M. A. Nordin Z. S. Insaf Ali Siming Ali AsgherChandio & Mansoor Ali Koondher (2015). Developing reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies: A review of previous studies. English Language Teaching 8(8) 181- 186 doi:
Channa, M. A., Nordin, Z. S., Insaf Ali Siming, Ali AsgherChandio, & Mansoor Ali Koondher (2015). Developing reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies: A review of previous studies. English Language Teaching, 8(8), 181- 186, doi:10.5539/elt.v8n8p181.)| false
Commander, N. E., & Stanwyck, D. J. (1997). Illusion of knowing in adult readers: Effects of reading skills and passage length, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 39-52, doi:10.1006/ceps.1997.0925)| false
Demetriou A. (2000) Organization and development of self-understanding & selfregulation: towards a general theory. In Boekaerts M. Pintrich P. R. & Zeidner M. (Eds) Handbook of Self-Regulation. London Academic Press.
Flavell J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 34(10)906-911 doi:
Flavell J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In Dickson W. P. (Ed.) Children's oralcommunication skills (pp. 35-60). New York: Academic Press.
Flavell J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In Weinert F. E. & Kluwe R. H. (Eds.) Metacognition motivation and understanding (pp. 21-29). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Flavell J. H. (2004). Theory-of-mind development: Retrospect and prospect. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 50 274-290.
Franco-Castillo I. (2013). The relationship between scaffolding metacognitive strategies identified through dialogue journals and second graders’ reading comprehension science achievement and metacognition using expository text. FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Paper 1014.
Hammadou J. (1991). Interrelationship among prior knowledge inference and language proficiency in foreign language reading. The Modern Language Journal 75(1) 27-38.
Huberman A. M. & Miles M. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
Huff J. D. & Nietfeld J. L. (2009). Using strategy instruction and confidence judgments to improve metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning 4(2) 161-176 doi:
Huff, J. D., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2009). Using strategy instruction and confidence judgments to improve metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning, 4(2), 161-176, doi: 10.1007/s11409-009-9042-8)| false
Kramarski B. & Mevarech Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: The effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal 40(1) 281-310 doi:
Kramarski, B. & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: The effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 281-310, doi: 10.3102/00028312040001281)| false
Maki R. (1998). Test predictions over test material. In Hacker D. J. Dunlosky J. & Graesser A. C. (Eds.) Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 117- 144). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Maki R. H. & McGuire M. J. (2002). Metacognition for text: Findings and implications for education. In Perfect T. J. & Schwartz B. L. (Eds.) Appliedmetacognition (pp. 39-67). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mevarech Z. R. & Amrany C. (2008). Immediate and delayed effects of metacognitive instruction on regulation of cognition and mathematics achievement. Metacognition Learning 3(2) 147-157 doi:
Mevarech, Z. R., & Amrany, C. (2008). Immediate and delayed effects of metacognitive instruction on regulation of cognition and mathematics achievement. Metacognition Learning, 3(2), 147-157, doi: 10.1007/s11409- 008-9023-3)| false
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139, doi: 10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8)| false
Schwartz B. L. & Perfect T. J. (2002). Introduction: Toward an applied metacognition. In Perfect T. J. & Schwartz B. L. (Eds.) Applied metacognition (pp. 1-11). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shah P. M. Yusof A. Lip S. M. Mahmood N. Hamid Y. E. A. & Hashim S. M. (2010). Comparing reading processing strategies of second language readers. American Journal of Applied Science 7 140-144.
Sinthopruangchai S. (2011). A study of Thai EFL learners’ Metacognition Awareness of reading strategies. (Master Research Paper Unpublished). Language Institute Thammasat University Bangkok Thailand.
Strauss A. & Corbin J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. California: Sage Publications.
Tarricone P. (2011). The taxonomy of metacognition. Hove UK: Psychology Press.
Wei Y. (2005). The relationship between phonological awareness and reading ability of Thai students in English and Thai primary schools of Thailand. Curriculum and Instruction Theses and Dissertations UM Theses and Dissertations (UMI No. 3175161) ProQuest Information and Learning: Collage Park MD.
Young A. & Fry J. D. (2008). Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 8(2) 1-10.
Zelazo P. D. (2004). The development of conscious control in childhood. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(1) 12-17.