Comparative exploration of learning styles and teaching techniques between Thai and Vietnamese EFL students and instructors

Open access


Learning styles have been a particular focus of a number of researchers over the past decades. Findings from various studies researching into how students learn highlight significant relationships between learners’ styles of learning and their language learning processes and achievement. This research focuses on a comparative analysis of the preferences of English learning styles and teaching techniques perceived by students from Thailand and Vietnam, and the teaching styles and techniques practiced by their instructors. The purposes were 1) to investigate the learning styles and teaching techniques students from both countries preferred, 2) to investigate the compatibility of the teaching styles and techniques practiced by instructors and those preferred by the students, 3) to specify the learning styles and teaching techniques students with high level of English proficiency preferred, and 4) to investigate the similarities of Thai and Vietnamese students’ preferences for learning styles and teaching techniques. The sample consisted of two main groups: 1) undergraduate students from King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok (KMUTNB), Thailand and Thai Nguyen University (TNU), Vietnam and 2) English instructors from both institutions. The instruments employed comprised the Students’ Preferred English Learning Style and Teaching Technique Questionnaire and the Teachers’ Practiced English Teaching Style and Technique Questionnaire. The collected data were analyzed using arithmetic means and standard deviation. The findings can contribute to the curriculum development and assist teachers to teach outside their comfort level to match the students’ preferred learning styles. In addition, the findings could better promote the courses provided for students. By understanding the learning style make-up of the students enrolled in the courses, faculty can adjust their modes of content delivery to match student preferences and maximize student learning. Finally, this research could establish better understanding between language learning natures of people from Thailand and Vietnam.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Akkakoson S. (2011). Learning and teaching style preferences in EFL. Journal of the Worldwide Forum on Education and Culture)31( 66-78.

  • Alkhasaweh I. M. Mrayyan M. T. Docherty C Alashram S. & Yosef H. (2008). Problem-based learning (PBL): Assessing students’ learning preferences using VARK. Nurse Education Today 28 572-579.

  • Barbe W. B. & Milone M. N. (1981). What We Know About Modality Strengths. Educational Leadership 70 (1) 378-380.

  • Bastable S. B. (2008). Nurse as educator: Principles of teaching and learning for nursing practice (3rd ed.). Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

  • Brown H. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.

  • Carbo M. Dunn R. & Dunn K. (1986). Teaching Students to Read Through Their Individual Learning Styles. Prentice-Hall.

  • Cohen A. D. & Weaver S. J. (2005). Styles and strategies-based instruction: A teachers’ guide. CARLA Working Paper Series A rewritten version of paper #7 Univesity of Minnesota.

  • Colbert J. A. Brown R. S. Choi H. & Thomas S. (2008). An investigation of the impacts of teacher-driven professional development on pedagogy and student learning. Teacher Education Quarterly 35(2) 135-154.

  • Dullien S. & Priewe J. (2010). Teaching Tools: A Digital Handbook for Academic Lecturers. Retrieved from

  • Dunn R.k & Griggs S. (1988). Learning styles: Quiet revolution in American secondary schools. Reston VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.

  • Ehrman M. (1996). Understanding second language learning difficulties. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.

  • Felder M. R. (2002). Learning and teaching styles in Engineering education. Engr. Education 78(7) 674-681

  • Felder R. M. & Silverman L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education [Electronic Version]. Engr. Education 78(7) 674-681. Retrieved on December 29th 2013 from:

  • Fischer B. B. & Fischer L. (1979). Styles in Teaching and Learning. Educational Leadership 36 (January) 251.

  • Jonassen D. (1999). Designing Constructivist Learning Environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.) Instructional-design theories and models: Vol. II. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 215-239). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Jung C. G. (1971). Psychological Types. Princeton University Press: Princeton N.J.

  • Katsioloudis P. & Fantz T.D. (2012). A Comparative Analysis of Preferred Learning and Teaching Styles for Engineering Industrial and Technology Education Students and Faculty. Journal of Technology Education. 23(2) 61-69.

  • Katz A. (1996). Teaching style: A way to understand instruction in language classrooms. In K. M. Bailey and D. Nunan (Eds.) Voices from the Language Classroom (pp.57-87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Keefe J. (1987). Learning style theory and practice. Reston VA: NASSP.

  • Kirkpatrick A. (2007). Implications for English language teaching. In A. Kirkpatrick World Englishes: Implications for international communication and English language teaching (pp. 184 – 197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kinsella K. (1995). Understanding and empowering diverse learners. In J. Reid (Ed.) Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (170-194). Boston: Hcinlc.

  • Mayer R. E. (1996). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist 32 1–19.

  • Mulalic A. Shah P. M. & Ahmad F. (2009). Perceptual learning styles of ESL students. European Journal of Social Sciences 7(3) 101-113.

  • Myers I. & McCaulley M. (1985). Manual: a guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

  • Nakhornsri S. Panproegsa S. Wimolkasem N. Sangwirach T. & Mahaphunthong C. (2014). The Development of the Quality and the Ability Band for the English Proficiency Tests. KMUTNB: Thailand

  • Noom-ura S. (2013). English-Teaching Problems in Thailand and Thai Teachers’ Professional Development Needs. English Language Teaching 6 11.

  • Nunan D. (2003). Action Research in the Classroom in J. C. Richards and D. Nunan (eds.).

  • Oxford R.L. (2003). Language Learning Styles and Strategies: An Overview. GALA.

  • Oxford R.L. & Anderson N. (1995). State of the art: A crosscultural view of language learning styles. Language Teaching 28(4) 201 – 215.

  • Provost J. & Anchors S. (1987). Applications of the Myers-Briggs type indicator in higher education. Palo Alto Calif: Davies-Black Publishing.

  • Reid J. M. (1995). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL students. TESOL Quarterly 21 (1) 87 – 111.

  • Rochester Institute of Technology. (n.d.). Retrieved on April 1st 2014 from:

  • Reid J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly 21(1) 87-111.

  • Stafford R. Dunn K. J. & Bacon A. (1993). Teaching Secondary Students Through Their Individual Learning Styles. Prentice-Hall.

  • Thai-AEC (n.d.). Retrieved on April 1st 2014 from:

  • Stebbins C. (1995). Culture-specific perceptual-learning style preferences of postsecondary students of English as a second language. In J. Reid (Ed.) Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp. 108-117). Boston: Heinle.

  • Thailand Convention and Exhibition Bureau. (2009). Thai and ASEAN community. Retrieved from

  • The ASEAN Secretariat. (n.d.). Retrieved on April 1st 2014 from:

  • Van Van H. (2010). The current situation and issues of the teaching of English in Vietnam. 立命館言語 文化研究 22 1.

  • Vu P.H. (2013). Asia News Network. Retrieved on April 1st 2014 from:

  • Wiriyachitra A. (2002). English language teaching and learning in Thailand in this decade. Thai TESOL Focus 15(1) 4-9.

  • Wittmann-Price R. A. & Godshall M. (2009). Strategies to promote deep learning in clinical nursing courses. Nurse Educator 34(5) 214-216.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 689 376 19
PDF Downloads 681 508 38