A comparative self-assessment of difficulty in learning English and German among Sudanese students

Adil Ishag 1 , Claus Altmayer 2 , and Evelin Witruk 2
  • 1 International University of Africa, Sudan & University of Leipzig, Germany
  • 2 University of Leipzig, Germany

Abstract

It is generally assumed that self-assessment plays a profound role in autonomous language learning and, accordingly, leads to learner independency. It encourages learners to prospect their own language learning processes and provides them with feedback of their learning progress. Self-assessment also raises the awareness of learners’ individual needs among both students and teachers alike and will therefore contribute to the development of the whole learning process.

The purpose of the current study is to explore and compare – through self-assessment – the level of perceived difficulty of the overall foreign language learning and language skills among Sudanese students enrolled at the English and German language departments respectively, at the University of Khartoum in Sudan. A representative sample composed of 221 students from the two departments have been asked to self-evaluate and rate the overall language difficulty and areas of difficulty in language skills, as well as their own language proficiency.

The results indicate that German language is relatively rated as a difficult language in comparison to the English language and that German grammar was also rated as more difficult. However, students rated the pronunciation and spelling of German language as easier than in English language. Concerning the language skills, reading and speaking skills were reported as more difficult in German, whereas writing and listening tend to be easier than in English. Finally, students’ academic achievements have been self-reported.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Angelo, T. A. & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

  • Arter, J. (1996). Using Assessment as a Tool for Learning. In Blum, R. & Arter, J. (Eds.), Student Performance Assessment in an Era of Restructuring (p. 1-6). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

  • Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing Learning Through Self Assessment. London: Kogan Page.

  • Boud, D. & Falchikov, N. (1989). Quantitative Studies of Self-assessment in Higher Education: A Critical Analysis of Findings. Higher Education, 18(5), 529-549.

  • Brown, H. D. (1987). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. (2nd ed.), New Jersey: Printice-Hall.

  • Byung-gon, Y. (1992). A Review of The Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis. Retrieved from: http://fonetiks.info/bgyang/db/92cah.pdf

  • Chamot, A. U. & J. M. O’Malley. 1994. The CALLA Handbook: Implementing the Cognitive Language Learning Approach. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

  • Chen, Y. M. (2008). Learning to Self-assessment Oral Performance in English: A Longitudinal Case Study. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 235-262.

  • Corder, S. P. (1971). Idiosyncratic Dialects and Errors Analysis. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, Vol 9.

  • Dann, R. (2002). Promoting Assessment as Learning: Improving the Learning Process. New York: Routledge.

  • Dickinson, L. (1987). Self-Instruction in Language Learning. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

  • Dochy, F. J. R. S. & McDowell, L. (1997). Assessment as a Tool for Learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4), 279-298.

  • Durrell, M. (1977). Zur Morphologischen Struktur der Deutschen Nominalphrase. Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 14(1), 44-52.

  • Geeslin, K. L. (2003). Student Self-assessment in the Foreign Language Classroom: The Place of Authentic Assessment Instruments in the Spanish Language Classroom, Hispania, 86(4), 857-868.

  • Harrington, T. F. (1995). Assessment of Abilities. US: North Carolina.

  • Huba, M. E. & Freed, J.E. (2000). Learner-centered Assessment on College Campuses. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

  • Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics Across Cultures. Ann Arbour, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

  • Liu, J., & Costanzo, K. (2013). The Relationship among TOEIC Listening, Reading, Speaking, and Writing Skills. In D. E. Powers (Eds.) The Research Foundation for TOEIC Test: A Compendium of Studies. Vol. 2, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

  • Oller, J. W. & Ziahosseiny, S. M. (1970). The Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis and Spelling Errors. Language Learning, Vol. 20.

  • O’Malley, J. M. & Valedez Pierce, L. (1996). Authentic Assessment for English Language Learners: Practical Approaches for Teachers. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

  • Paris, S. G. & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom Applications of Research on Self-regulated Learning. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 89–101.

  • Rogers, M. (1987). Learners’ Difficulties with Grammatical Gender in German as a Foreign Language. Applied Linguistics, Vol. 8(1), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Ross, S. (1998). Self-assessment in Second Language Testing: A Meta-analysis and Analysis of Experimental Factors. Language Testing, 15(1), 1–20.

  • Saito, Y. (2005). The Use of Self-assessment in Second Language Assessment. Working Papers in TESOL and Applied Linguistics. Retrieved from www.tc.columbia.edu/academic/tesol/WJFiles/pdf/Saito_Forum.pdf

  • Ushioda E. (1996). Learner Autonomy 5: The Role of Motivation. Dublin: Authentik.

  • Wenden, A. L. (2001). Metacognitive Knowledge in SLA: The Neglected Variable. In M. P. Breen (Ed.), Learner Contributions to Language Learning (p. 44-64). Harlow, England: Longman.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search