Hybrid warfare and hybrid threats today and tomorrow: towards an analytical framework

Open access


This article first traces the origin of hybrid warfare and the label game surrounding the concept, asking whether it is merely old wine in a new bottle, and if so, whether it is still a useful concept. It is found that while being old wine in new bottles, it is still a good wine well worth drinking. While there is not much new in the concept itself, it is a useful tool to think about past wars, today’s wars and the wars of the future. Thereafter, this paper analyses how hybrid warfare and hybrid threats are to be understood in the context of peace, conflict and war. It is shown how hybrid warfare and threats fit into our traditional understanding of conflict dynamics.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Berdal Mats ‘The “New Wars” Thesis Revisited’ in Hew Strachan and Sibylle Scheipers (eds) The Changing Character of War Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011 pp. 109-10.

  • Galeotti Mark. 2016. Hybrid War or Gibridnaya Voina? Getting Russia’s non-linear military challenge right: Mayak Intelligence.

  • Galeotti Mark and Andrew S. Bowen. 2014. “Putin’s Empire of the Mind.” Foreign Policy 2014. 206.

  • Bērziņš Jānis. 2014a. Russia’s New Generation Warfare in Ukraine: Implications for Latvian defense policy. Riga: National Defence Academy of Latvia Center for Security and Strategic Studies.

  • Bērziņš Jānis. 2014b. Russian “New Generation Warfare”: More democracy is the solution. Deterrence Paper No. 5 January 29 Washington: Center for European Policy Analysis.

  • Jordan David James Kiras David J. Lonsdale Ian Speller Christopher Tuck and C. Dale Walton. 2016. Understanding modern warfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Nicander Lars and Linnea Arnevall. 2015. “‘Fingret i magen‘: Ryska utmaningar för svensk-finskt försvarspolitiskt tänkande.” KKrv Handlingar & Tidskrift 4: 129–35.

  • Mansoor Peter R. 2012. “Introduction: Hybrid Warfare in History.” In Hybrid Warfare: Fighting Complex Opponents from the Ancient World to the Present edited by Williamson Murray and Peter R. Mansoor 1–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Marshall Tim and John Scarlett. 2016. Prisoners of Geography: Ten maps that tell you everything you need to know about global politics. Revised and updated edition. London: Elliott and Thompson Limited.

  • Polese Abel Rob Kevlihan and Donnacha Ó Beacháin. 2016. “Introduction: Hybrid warfare in post-Soviet spaces is there a logic behind?” Small Wars & Insurgencies 27 (3): 361–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2016.1151660.

  • Reichborn-Kjennerud Erik and Patrick Cullen. 2016. What is Hybrid Warfare? NUPI Policy Brief 26 Feb. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. Accessed 2 April 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2380867.

  • Renz Bettina. 2016. “Russia and ‘hybrid warfare’.” Contemporary Politics 22 (3): 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2016.1201316.

  • Swanström Niklas and Mikael Weissmann. 2005. Conflict conflict prevention conflict management and beyond. Uppsala: Silk Road Studies Program. Accessed 2 April 2019. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/113660/2005_swanstrom-weissman_concept-paper_conflict-prevention-management-and-beyond.pdf.

  • Swedish Armed Forces. 2016. Militärstrategisk doktrin [Military Strategic Doctrine]: MSD 16. Stockholm: Swedish Armed Forces (Försvarsmakten).

  • Swedish Armed Forces. 2018. Tillväxt för ett starkare försvar [Growth for a stronger defence]: Slutredovisning av försvarsmaktens perspektivstudie 2016-2018. Stockholm: Swedish Armed Forces (Försvarsmakten). Accessed 2 April 2019. https://www.forsvarsmakten.se/siteassets/4-om-myndigheten/dokumentfiler/perspektivplan/slutlig-redovisning-av-perspektivstudien-2016-2018.pdf.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 703 703 330
PDF Downloads 710 710 369